Alexey,
Thanks for reviewing.
The next revision will have those two nits fixed.
Thx
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov
Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framew...@ietf.org"
, Stephane Litkowski
, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" ,
"stephane.litkow...@orange.com" ,
"bess@ietf.org"
Subject: Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From:
Resent-To: , ,
, , ,
Resent-Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2019 at 7:29 PM
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-07: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework/
--
COMMENT:
--
1.2.2. Traffic Black-Holing on Individual AC Failures
As discussed in section 2.1 the Default DF Election algorithm defined
by [RFC7432] takes into account only two variables in the modulus
function for a given ES: the existence of the PE's IP address on the
candidate list and the locally provisioned Ethernet Tags.
This document doesn't have section 2.1.
1.3. The Need for Extending the Default DF Election in EVPN
Section 2.2 describes some of the issues that exist in the Default DF
Election procedures. In order to address those issues, this document
This document doesn't have section 2.2 either.
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
