Thank you Adrian and Satya.
We added this sentence in the introduction section as suggested by Adrian:
"This document does not intend to update [RFC7432] or [RFC8214] but improve the
behavior of the DF Election on PEs that are upgraded to follow the described
procedures."
Hopefully this clears
We're good. Thanks!
Consult with your AD, but for the "updates" question, a way forward would be to
make an explicit statement (in the Introduction) to the contrary.
Best,
Adrian
--
Fairy tales from North Wales brought to you for Christmas
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/
Available from
Hi Jorge and Adrian.
Inline [Satya].
Thanks,
--Satya
On 12/14/18, 2:40 AM, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Thank you very much for your thorough review.
I incorporated most of your comments, please see the details in-line with
[JORGE].
Hi Adrian,
Thank you very much for your thorough review.
I incorporated most of your comments, please see the details in-line with
[JORGE].
There is one outstanding comment that Satya and I will discuss.
Thank you.
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)"
Date: Friday
Hi Adrian,
Thank you very much for your detailed review and comments.
We will take care of all the nits that you have pointed out and include the
reference to the IEEE/ACM TON paper (the link you have pointed out is indeed
correct).
However, I had one query. Most of the time research journal/co
Reviewer: Adrian Farrel
Review result: Has Nits
Hello,
I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The
Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as
they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special
request. The p
