With FXC, VLANs from different ports are muxed onto a single service tunnel
(e.g., single PW). So, VLANs from one port on one PE can be spread on different
ports on the remote PE. Furthermore, only some of the the VLANs from different
ports on remote PE are multiplexed onto that service tunnel.
Hello,
This question is not strictly related to this draft, but to VPWS in
general and may sound naive.
So *please* pardon me.
Shouldn't the port on the remote PE be turned down when its
equivalents on local PEs do the same?
This is something you can find on L2VPN VPWS signaled by LDP.
When loca
It has already been updated and the rev02 has been checked in.
Regards,
Ali
On 2/13/18, 6:43 AM, "Martin Vigoureux" wrote:
ok, let us know when you've updated it, we'll call it for adoption fater
that.
-m
Le 2018-02-13 à 3:50, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) a écrit :
> H
ok, let us know when you've updated it, we'll call it for adoption fater
that.
-m
Le 2018-02-13 à 3:50, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) a écrit :
Hi Martin, Stephane:
This is one of the draft in my plate that I needed to update and ask for
a WG call. It has already been implemented by number of vendor
Hi Martin, Stephane:
This is one of the draft in my plate that I needed to update and ask for a WG
call. It has already been implemented by number of vendors and has had pretty
good consensus.
Regards,
Ali
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://
