Hi WG,
We haven't received any concern about progressing this document without an
implementation.
We will proceed accordingly.
Brgds,
From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
stephane.litkow...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2019 07:19
To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; be
Dear chairs and WG,
I strongly believe we should progress
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates for the following reasons:
* The draft defines a number of fundamental routes that are critical for
the deployment of multicast technologies in EVPN, especially the S-PMSI A-D and
Leaf-AD
