If it's not already available in the python API
Hmm, I think not, as far as I can see in 'blender_python_reference_2_57'
and by searching in 'blender-2.60a' sources. I've found only two files in
sources with references to 'SMikkTSpaceContext' struct and
to 'genTangSpaceDefault' function:
-
Oh, I am sorry again, I'd thought that you mean soft/hard edges not faces,
I stupid! :\
Yeah there is must me way to gen those normals too.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Eugene Minov minov@gmail.com wrote:
If it's not already available in the python API
Hmm, I think not, as far as
@ Campbell
Thanks for your advice. Finally blender compiles again using scons, but
still no luck with CMake. To use QtCreator for debugging, I have to create
the project files with cmake_qtcreator_project.py and although I followed
your instructions from the wiki, I'm getting this error
There is no point in doing this unless you export the correct tangents and
normals. That is the ones
that were used to bake the normal map.
I realize it blows that there is no API function to get the render normal.
So what you have to do is produce it yourself
like is done in
Yes, I absolutely agree, hard faces obviously must be exported in the same
way how they seen in render.
I think they can welds along with tangents.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Morten Mikkelsen mikkels...@gmail.comwrote:
There is no point in doing this unless you export the correct tangents
Chiamami domani verso ora di pranzo al 3777074625 ora sono molto impegnato sto
lavorando su una Correzione Colore
E-Mail Sent via BlackBerry from BT Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Eugene Minov minov@gmail.com
Sender: bf-committers-boun...@blender.org
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:43:12
Hey Brecht,
Loving cycles btw :)
I just was noticing the other day that I hadn't yet tried out jemalloc
in the cmake settings. So I grabbed the latest git copy and installed
it. The problem was that blender seemed to fail to compile.
I don't have the compile error handy, but I recall it
I don't know anything about Python but if you can get hold of the dm
(DerivedMesh)
on the c side of things then I can show you how to get the correct normals
and tangents
and even help you get them welded should you want this.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Eugene Minov minov@gmail.com
Hi Brecht,
this adds the show stopper back we had in 2.60. Click on the minus
icon in the 3D header, and the space selector and the minus/plus icons
disappears.
I think we have to tackle this issue differently, maybe in the C template.
Best regards,
Thomas
Am 15.11.2011 20:25, schrieb Brecht
I was just thinking today that Cycles could do motion blur without
taking a big CPU hit. I don't know much about all this so I bet my
ideas is wrong or old but I thought I would post it just in case.
When we do animation the computer calculates tweens and moves stuff
for us. It does this once per
Is interesting a full unbiased solution to motion blur can be instead or
sampling (rendering) a point in time scene (static) to fully sample(in a random
or pseudo random) way an interval scene (like the aperture size of the camera)
though this may be more efficient in terms of required
Would this not require a BVH rebuild on each pass?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Raul Fernandez farsthar...@yahoo.eswrote:
Is interesting a full unbiased solution to motion blur can be instead
or sampling (rendering) a point in time scene (static) to fully sample(in a
random or pseudo
I've said compilant as in I've tested with several meshes with
automatic unwrapping (lots of seams) and baking from multires data and
the result is perfect. I don't really know if it's really 100%
compatible. I guess I must test with weird quads to be sure.
In any case, I can tab - ctrl+t
Get but it is on the to do list.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Carsten Wartmann c...@blenderbuch.de wrote:
It is already possible to get this kind of motion blur in cycles. Switch to
blender internal and use the sampled motion blur panel to setup. Then back in
cycles you get mblur
Sorry, typo, too early.
I meant good. As in it is good that we have it.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Knapp magick.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Get but it is on the to do list.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Carsten Wartmann c...@blenderbuch.de
wrote:
It is already possible to get this kind
15 matches
Mail list logo
