Re: [Bibdesk-users] Web group issues continuing

2007-11-05 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Nov 5, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Adam M.Goldstein wrote: > The following search won't bring up new references when I move to the > second page of search results in google scholar: > > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ontology&hl=en&lr=&start=20&sa=N > > The first ten references come up, but then no

[Bibdesk-users] Web group issues continuing

2007-11-05 Thread Adam M . Goldstein
The following search won't bring up new references when I move to the second page of search results in google scholar: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ontology&hl=en&lr=&start=20&sa=N The first ten references come up, but then no more do when I navigate to more. I am showing 10 reference

Re: [Bibdesk-users] COPAC/Google Scholar search result problem

2007-11-05 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:21PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thanks for the quick response Adam! > >On 06 Nov 2007, at 00:08, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: >> >> On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > wrote: >>> I just checked in a fix

Re: [Bibdesk-users] COPAC/Google Scholar search result problem

2007-11-05 Thread Jamal Shahin
Thanks for the quick response Adam! On 06 Nov 2007, at 00:08, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> >> 2. As I understand, the Web group should be able to gather >> collections >> from a google scholar result list? I

Re: [Bibdesk-users] COPAC/Google Scholar search result problem

2007-11-05 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On 6 Nov 2007, at 12:08 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote: > > On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I seem to be having a problem with two different search capabilities >> of the latest nightly build of Bibdesk (925). >> >> 1. COPAC (

Re: [Bibdesk-users] COPAC/Google Scholar search result problem

2007-11-05 Thread Adam R. Maxwell
On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello all, > >I seem to be having a problem with two different search capabilities >of the latest nightly build of Bibdesk (925). > >1. COPAC (z39.50) returns 'Empty Title' for everything I have tried >searc

[Bibdesk-users] COPAC/Google Scholar search result problem

2007-11-05 Thread Jamal Shahin
Hello all, I seem to be having a problem with two different search capabilities of the latest nightly build of Bibdesk (925). 1. COPAC (z39.50) returns 'Empty Title' for everything I have tried searching. I've fiddled with the syntax and the character encodings, but nothing seems to work. T

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Minor request: Applescripts

2007-11-05 Thread Christiaan Hofman
On 5 Nov 2007, at 2:19 PM, François Briatte wrote: > I think a TAR archive would be more appropriate, yes. > > Perhaps the "About Scripts" dialogue could mention that scripts are > downloadable from the wiki. > > I get your point about scripts and not including them by default. Is > there anything

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Minor request: Applescripts

2007-11-05 Thread François Briatte
I think a TAR archive would be more appropriate, yes. Perhaps the "About Scripts" dialogue could mention that scripts are downloadable from the wiki. I get your point about scripts and not including them by default. Is there anything new in 10.5 on the side of text handling (upper/lower/capit. ca

Re: [Bibdesk-users] Minor request: Applescripts

2007-11-05 Thread Christiaan Hofman
I can replace it with a gzipped tar archive. As for including in BD, I think the problem is that most scripts (in particular the capitalization script) requires some special installation, which the user may also want to change. So I don't want to let BibDesk do that, the user should do that

[Bibdesk-users] Minor request: Applescripts

2007-11-05 Thread François Briatte
Hello all, This file contains scripts of essential value to the user: http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/scripts/AllScripts.sitx - Would it be possible to provide it in a free format that does not force the user into installing Stuffit Expander, even though it is free? - Would it be possible to con