On Nov 5, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Adam M.Goldstein wrote:
> The following search won't bring up new references when I move to the
> second page of search results in google scholar:
>
> http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ontology&hl=en&lr=&start=20&sa=N
>
> The first ten references come up, but then no
The following search won't bring up new references when I move to the
second page of search results in google scholar:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=ontology&hl=en&lr=&start=20&sa=N
The first ten references come up, but then no more do when I navigate
to more.
I am showing 10 reference
On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:21PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Thanks for the quick response Adam!
>
>On 06 Nov 2007, at 00:08, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>>
I just checked in a fix
Thanks for the quick response Adam!
On 06 Nov 2007, at 00:08, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>>
>> 2. As I understand, the Web group should be able to gather
>> collections
>> from a google scholar result list? I
On 6 Nov 2007, at 12:08 AM, Adam R. Maxwell wrote:
>
> On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I seem to be having a problem with two different search capabilities
>> of the latest nightly build of Bibdesk (925).
>>
>> 1. COPAC (
On Monday, November 05, 2007, at 03:02PM, "Jamal Shahin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hello all,
>
>I seem to be having a problem with two different search capabilities
>of the latest nightly build of Bibdesk (925).
>
>1. COPAC (z39.50) returns 'Empty Title' for everything I have tried
>searc
Hello all,
I seem to be having a problem with two different search capabilities
of the latest nightly build of Bibdesk (925).
1. COPAC (z39.50) returns 'Empty Title' for everything I have tried
searching. I've fiddled with the syntax and the character encodings,
but nothing seems to work. T
On 5 Nov 2007, at 2:19 PM, François Briatte wrote:
> I think a TAR archive would be more appropriate, yes.
>
> Perhaps the "About Scripts" dialogue could mention that scripts are
> downloadable from the wiki.
>
> I get your point about scripts and not including them by default. Is
> there anything
I think a TAR archive would be more appropriate, yes.
Perhaps the "About Scripts" dialogue could mention that scripts are
downloadable from the wiki.
I get your point about scripts and not including them by default. Is
there anything new in 10.5 on the side of text handling
(upper/lower/capit. ca
I can replace it with a gzipped tar archive.
As for including in BD, I think the problem is that most scripts (in
particular the capitalization script) requires some special
installation, which the user may also want to change. So I don't want
to let BibDesk do that, the user should do that
Hello all,
This file contains scripts of essential value to the user:
http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/scripts/AllScripts.sitx
- Would it be possible to provide it in a free format that does not
force the user into installing Stuffit Expander, even though it is
free?
- Would it be possible to con
11 matches
Mail list logo