I am starting to work through the cataloging rules in order to
improve treatments of imports from z39.50 imports. First, I have a
question for Christiaan or some other developer about how the parsers
work. Does it work by reading the field numbers, and then the
indicator? For example, the
On 11 Oct 2007, at 6:48 PM, Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
I am starting to work through the cataloging rules in order to
improve treatments of imports from z39.50 imports. First, I have a
question for Christiaan or some other developer about how the parsers
work. Does it work by reading the field
On 11 Oct 2007, at 7:43 PM, Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
On 11 Oct 2007, at 6:48 PM, Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
I am starting to work through the cataloging rules in order to
improve treatments of imports from z39.50 imports. First, I have a
On Oct 11, 2007, at 1:03 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
If developers and other users really do think they don't want
keywords brought in, let me know, and I won't keep up the effort.
I'm just a new user, but from my short experience with BibDesk I'd rather
delete a few extra keywords than add
On 11 Oct 2007, at 8:51 PM, Adam M. Goldstein wrote:
On Oct 11, 2007, at 2:20 PM, Christiaan Hofman wrote:
snip
That parser can in principle determine the indicators, but
currently
they are ignored. They are not always included and are sometimes
inconsistent. I haven't found a real
