I just downloaded the last nightly, and ... to my great joy the new
addition to the autogeneration syntax is already working!
Thank you so very much, Christiaan, for finding a solution and immediately
implementing it.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Jan David Hauck
wrote:
> That would be more
That would be more than awesome! :)
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Christiaan Hofman
wrote:
> I may have a better solution. Add the number at the end of the metal
> optional argument,
>
> *%a**[,][etal1]20*
>
> The problem would be when someone would have used numbers art the end of
> "et
I may have a better solution. Add the number at the end of the metal optional
argument,
%a[,][etal1]20
The problem would be when someone would have used numbers art the end of "et
al." itself, but I think that won’t happen.
Christiaan
> On 11 Jul 2018, at 17:39, Jan David Hauck wrote:
>
>
Yeah, I thought about that.
But might it not be feasible to add it as an additional option?
For example, I could think of a set of optional third (or, for %A%P, fourth)
brackets with a number, with the meaning
"max number of authors if etal is present"
*%a[,][etal][1]20*
*%A[,][,][etal][1]20*
I am sorry, we can not support this. It would not be backwards compatible,
current formats would not automagically conform themselves.
Christiaan
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging
Dear all,
A couple of years ago, an Apple script was circulated on this list to get
BibDesk to generate citekeys following the schema below:
1) McCracken_2004 for a single author
2) McCracken_and_Maxwell_2004 for two authors
3) McCracken_et_al_2004 for 3 or more authors
Essentially, what is
Dear all,
A couple of years ago, an Apple script was circulated on this list to get
BibDesk to generate citekeys following the schema below:
1) McCracken_2004 for a single author
2) McCracken_and_Maxwell_2004 for two authors
3) McCracken_et_al_2004 for 3 or more authors
Essentially, what is
