Why aren't you guys running spam filters? The only time I see spam on this
list is when you folks reply to it.
Spam isn't a fad on the internet; it's here to stay and it's going to
eventually infect every email account you've ever had. Get a -good- spam
filter and stop worrying about the mailing
Title: Re: [binc] Spam Filters, etc.
Is this an issue of people replying to everyone vs. replying just to the list? The last response I sent (that apparently was duplicated) was a reply-all case.
The response Im sending right now is replying just to the list.
Knowing that might help isolate
I've doubled the timeout to an hour. See what happens I guess.
-Bob
On 12/12/05 5:47 PM, Andreas Aardal Hanssen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Alan Knowles wrote:
I suspect it's the multi-connection way that MS clients work. and not
all threads in binc being notified of the
The port will run configure for you. I believe that the same idea still
works. Since you already have it installed you'll want to:
# cd /usr/ports/mail/bincimap
# make clean
# CXXFLAGS=-g make
# make deinstall
# make reinstall
When make is running you should see the calls to the compiler being
I quickly see this turning into the same license debate we've seen 100
times.
Andreas was asking for a license that makes the business world feel good
about modifying the source. GPL does not make me feel good. Something like
FreeBSD where I can give back the changes that I want to (think what
Something like FreeBSD where I can give back the changes that I want
to (think what Apple has done for various open source projects)
makes me feel good and is probably a fair compromise.
That's no compromise for the user, only the developer, in that ACME
can build a whizbang out of the
I certainly like the FreeBSD license. Can't get much more open than that. No
one is forced to give back their modifications under any circumstances which
makes a whole lot of sense.
The company I work for takes advantage of a lot of open source software and
although it doesn't make any business
Is the 1.3.3 tarball on the website the one to test with?
-Bob
Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Jerry Lundström wrote:
It's already part of 1.3, which will be available as soon as I find time
to work on it. 1.3 is not quite usable yet.
Need help with anything?
I have a folder with 46.6MB across 25 messages. I can move those
messages from folder to folder instantaneously. The MUA is Apple
Mail. In the past moving folders with more messages (but smaller total
size) has not been an issue.
The server in this case is a P4 3.0 w/2GB ram running a
, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
On Monday, April 25 at 01:23 PM, quoth Bob Van Zant:
I have a folder with 46.6MB across 25 messages. I can move those
messages from folder to folder instantaneously. The MUA is Apple
Mail. In the past moving folders with more messages (but smaller
total size) has not been
I think he said the primary box is Exchange.
-Bob
Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 08:20, Maurice Lucas wrote:
I want to synchronise 2 IMAP servers, the primairy will be exchange running
IMAP. The target which will be a kind off backup will be running BINC.
Is the
So what's the alternative? How do you prevent a DoS attack against the
system (ie,filling up the hard drive) .. ???
You can use quotas at the OS level. For FreeBSD:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/quotas.html.
Similar things exist for those other :-) unix-y operating
Hack the config file for squirrel mail to use Inbox/Sent, Inbox/Drafts
and Inbox/whatever-the-last-one-is. The reason is that, and someone
correct me if I'm wrong, Maildir++ has the root implicitly Inbox. Thus
any folders must be created as subfolders of Inbox.
-Bob
On Mar 6, 2005, at 10:03
This looks like a reasonable place to start:
http://www.bincimap.org/bincimap-faq.html#q19
There is a nice way to test checkpassword without binc in the way:
(http://www.qmail.org/top.html#checkpassword)
Mark Delany has a clever way to test your checkpassword with a bit of
command line
Perhaps a silly question, but have you subscribed to the folders in
your MUA? Perhaps courier (I've never run it) and Binc treat
subscriptions differently.
-Bob
On Feb 22, 2005, at 3:10 PM, d h a h n wrote:
I have Binc running up and running with vchkpw for vpopmail -
authentication is working
]: when entering depot
Maildir: N\
o such file or directory
DOH! That was easy. Created a Maildir for that user and everything looks
good.
Thanks for the ktrace idea. Never done that before.
-Bob
Peter Stuge wrote:
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 12:15:54AM -0800, Bob Van Zant wrote:
a001 login
On Feb 2, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Andy Gayton wrote:
Peter, just wondering what you mean by this. I feel more confident
using higher level languages which make it easier to avoid buffer
overflows, and (not sure about perl, but with python) working with
uninitialized variables.
I'd much rather have
:-)
-Bob
On Feb 2, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Kyle Lanclos wrote:
Bob Van Zant wrote:
I'm curious to know why more people don't go the route I did with
checkpassword-pam and then using the appropriate pam backend?
I've had bad encounters with PAM in the past, enough so that I only
worry about it when
18 matches
Mail list logo
