On 2/14/11 4:11 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Doug Bartondo...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It isn't a matter of not liking it. Given that you have steadfastly
refused to
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:50:49PM +1100,
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote
a message of 40 lines which said:
I could reproduce it in 9.7.1-P1 by just adding a DNSKEY record at
the apex
I cannot reproduce it. Any more detailed instructions? It will be more
difficult to convince the people in
I will consider very much your hints. Thank you for your point of view and I
would like to try What you suggested.
Riccardo
On 14/feb/2011, at 00:24, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/13/2011 8:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
It
On 02/11/2011 21:21, Terry. wrote:
2011/2/11 Joshua Frugéjfru...@lsu.edu:
running bind 9.6.3 installed from ports on Freebsd 7.3 (amd64)
Getting this error in my local log
10-Feb-2011 21:12:13.711 general: rbtdb.c:1506: INSIST(((unsigned
int)(((node)-references)-refs)) == 0 node-data ==
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:37:57AM +0100,
Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote
a message of 10 lines which said:
I cannot reproduce it.
Now, it works. Bug report sent to ISC [ISC-Bugs #23232] No, it is not
fixed in recent BINDs.
___
We are running BIND 9.7.2-P3, and update our zones with nsupdate calls
that look like this:
nsupdate -v -k keys/update-key [input] /dev/null 2[errors]
This is run from a Solaris 10_x86 non-global zone (container).
On a couple of occasions it has generated the error
dns_dispatch_getudp (v4):
On 13.02.11 09:25, Mark Andrews wrote:
zone xxx {
type master;
database _builtin empty nameserver contact;
};
In message 20110213155712.ga1...@fantomas.sk, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
Nice, but is that documented enough so the behaviour won't change or get
removed in
On Feb 13, 2011, at 9:06 AM, fddi wrote:
I do not know why you really don't liket this mysql solution.
OK I am talking of a DNS for HA purposes for grid computing services
for exampe, so DNS
resolution must be always working at any cost.
The David solution can be OK, but I want to be sure
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as master,
and one that has all the zones as slave. When the master dies, run a little
script on a slave that freezes the zones, edits the SOA to make that server the
MNAME and increment the serial, then thaws the zone. Swap
Is there, by any chance, a maximum size to the IXFRs BIND will send? I've
noticed an upstream server I slave from is being suspiciously consistent in the
number of records it sends per IXFR (86,450 plus or minus ~10 records). The
upstream server is part of an appliance, but fingerprints as
On 2011/02/14, at 10:47, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
Is there, by any chance, a maximum size to the IXFRs BIND will send? I've
noticed an upstream server I slave from is being suspiciously consistent in
the number of records it sends per IXFR (86,450 plus or minus ~10 records).
The upstream
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is precisely how I'd do it but actually haven't bothered to do the
work of setting up config files in advance. I should, because while it
is an easy task, if I need to do it, I'm probably not in the mood to
figure it out.
Having multiple masters
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
master, and one that has all the zones as slave. When the master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the zones, edits the SOA to make
that server the MNAME and
FWIW, I feel compelled to chime in -- for those who haven't already begun
to filter out this thread.
We have many thousands of records (internally) in hundreds of zones,
mostly dynamic.
We have 8 DNS servers providing authoritative and recursive service to
thousands of internal clients.
In case anyone is actually paying attention, I just re-read
my own post, and I'd like to clarify my plural reference to
the service addresses...
I have one service address for DDNS and separate service
address for zone transfers. So, technically we have to
change two static host-routes, not just
Rather than dropping all records in the copied zone, just compute a difference
and apply it to both views.
Or perhaps you should examine why you are using views in the first place and
decide if there is a better way to achieve this.
Regards,
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
On Feb 13, 2011, at
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
We are running BIND 9.7.2-P3, and update our zones with nsupdate calls
that look like this:
nsupdate -v -k keys/update-key [input] /dev/null 2[errors]
This is run from a Solaris 10_x86 non-global zone (container).
On a couple of
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-02-14 15:52 Mike Mitchell napisał(a):
I'd keep two copies of the BIND config, one that has all the zones as
master, and one that has all the zones as slave. When the
master dies,
run a little script on a slave that freezes the
On Feb 14 2011, Chris Buxton wrote:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:31 AM, Chris Thompson wrote:
We are running BIND 9.7.2-P3, and update our zones with nsupdate calls
that look like this:
nsupdate -v -k keys/update-key [input] /dev/null 2[errors]
This is run from a Solaris 10_x86 non-global zone
Greetings
I have a new slave server. I edited my master, incremented the serial number
and reloaded named. The master is fine, and contains the new entry but the
slaves are still running the previous entries.
what is the basic operation of updating a slave ?
I reloaded the zone with rndc and
Introduction
BIND 9.7.3 is the current release of BIND 9.7.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.7.1 to BIND 9.7.3. Please
see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a complete list of
all changes.
Download
The latest development version of BIND 9 software can
check your configure especially for:
* notify/ also-notify/ allow-notify
* allow-transfer
* does slave named have the permittion to write to data dir?
Regards.
2011/2/15 donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
Greetings
I have a new slave server. I edited my master, incremented the serial
Introduction
BIND 9.8.0rc1 is the first release candidate of BIND 9.8.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.7 to BIND 9.8. Please see
the CHANGES file in the source code release for a complete list of all
changes.
Download
The latest development versions of BIND 9
2011/2/15 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org:
9.7.3
* BIND now builds with threads disabled in versions of NetBSD earlier
than 5.0 and with pthreads enabled by default in NetBSD versions
5.0 and higher. Also removes support for unproven-pthreads,
mit-pthreads and ptl2. [RT
Remember that each view is a separate server, that has a limited access
(by the match-clients statement), these clients will see this server and
NOT the other two servers. Likewise a client in the edu view match list
will not see any of the other views (servers).
This is not one server, where the
On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Terry. wrote:
check your configure especially for:
* notify/ also-notify/ allow-notify
* allow-transfer
* does slave named have the permittion to write to data dir?
yes , salve can write.
slave options;
allow-transfer { 10.1.1.2; };
allow-notify
2011/2/15 donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us:
On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Terry. wrote:
check your configure especially for:
* notify/ also-notify/ allow-notify
* allow-transfer
* does slave named have the permittion to write to data dir?
yes , salve can write.
slave options;
2011/2/15 Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org:
9.7.3
* BIND now builds with threads disabled in versions of NetBSD
earlier
than 5.0 and with pthreads enabled by default in NetBSD versions
5.0 and higher. Also removes support for unproven-pthreads,
mit-pthreads and ptl2. [RT
In article mailman.123.1297730089.10842.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
donovan jeffrey j dono...@beth.k12.pa.us wrote:
Greetings
I have a new slave server. I edited my master, incremented the serial number
and reloaded named. The master is fine, and contains the new entry but the
slaves are
29 matches
Mail list logo
