Re: BIND 9.10.4 may have a fatal crash defect.

2016-05-17 Thread Evan Hunt
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:45:41AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > Known issue triggering a number of insist failures in rbt.c. > Please roll back to 9.10.3-P4 while we prepare a new release. Note that the probable fix is already in our public git repository.

Re: BIND 9.10.4 may have a fatal crash defect.

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Andrews
Known issue triggering a number of insist failures in rbt.c. Please roll back to 9.10.3-P4 while we prepare a new release. In message <573b903f.9000...@electricembers.coop>, Benjamin Connelly writes: > We are seeing occasional crashes after updating to 9.10.4 on FreeBSD 10.1. > > > May 17

BIND 9.10.4 may have a fatal crash defect.

2016-05-17 Thread Benjamin Connelly
We are seeing occasional crashes after updating to 9.10.4 on FreeBSD 10.1. May 17 09:46:07 smtp1 named[74136]: general: critical: rbt.c:2576: INSIST(delete)->is_root == 1) ? isc_boolean_true : isc_boolean_false) && *rootp == delete) || (! (((delete)->is_root == 1) ? isc_boolean_true :

Re: Trouble with option managed-keys

2016-05-17 Thread Mark Elkins
"managed-keys" is not a config option, try moving it outside the option stanza, eg options { version ""; // remove this to allow version queries listen-on{ 127.0.0.1; 192.168.21.101; }; listen-on-v6 { none; }; empty-zones-enable yes; allow-query

Trouble with option managed-keys

2016-05-17 Thread thl
Hi all, I have a problem with DNSSEC and I dont find a solution. Maybe someone can help me. My intention is to run a bind which acts as DNSSEC enabled resolver for my internal LAN. This runs on a VirtualBox instance with OpenBSD 5.9. I got a precompiled package from OpenBSD, version is

Re: Logging question about message 'update-security: error: client update denied'

2016-05-17 Thread Josh Nielsen
Okay, yeah I am running DHCP on the same server so I'll check its settings. Thanks! On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > > On 16 May 2016 at 19:03, Josh Nielsen wrote: > >> Thank you for the response Mark. I'm still a

Re: Forward zone not working

2016-05-17 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On 17 May 2016 at 09:29, Woodworth, John R wrote: > > > > > >Ideally every machine should be registering its own PTR record in the > > > >DNS and addresses without machines shouldn't have PTR records. > > > >The only reason ISP did this is that they were too lazy

RE: Forward zone not working

2016-05-17 Thread Woodworth, John R
> > > >Ideally every machine should be registering its own PTR record in the > > >DNS and addresses without machines shouldn't have PTR records. > > >The only reason ISP did this is that they were too lazy to manage PTR > > >records for their customers. > > > > And because no ISP wants

Re: Logging question about message 'update-security: error: client update denied'

2016-05-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
In message , Josh Nielsen writes: I have a message that has been showing up in my master DNS server's log over the past few weeks and I am wondering if I can find more verbose specifics from debugging messages in BIND somehow.

Re: Forward zone not working

2016-05-17 Thread sthaug
> >Ideally every machine should be registering its own PTR record in > >the DNS and addresses without machines shouldn't have PTR records. > >The only reason ISP did this is that they were too lazy to manage > >PTR records for their customers. > > And because no ISP wants "you.suck.isp.com" to