Mark I hear you but who gets called when a domain is not working on
provide A that is v6 only but works fine on provider B that is still v4
only?
is this domain a special case or is the expectation that Bind only do the
synthesis if the returns Empty RCODE NOERROR?
Thanks, Stephan
On Sat,
So I have domain.com, controlled by AD, but want to delegate
subdomain.domain.com to an external DNS server on the Internet (Amazon
Route53).
This is easy to do for my external version of domain.com as I can just
add
subdomain.domain.comNS amazonserver.com.
However, our AD servers a
In message , "Darcy Kevin
(FCA)" writes:
> I think the ISP may have done something untoward with
> 87.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa, since I'm
> getting a NODATA response for that name, from the 233.202.162.in-addr.arpa
> zone, most probabl
> y because it's an empty non-terminal. But what would be
I think the ISP may have done something untoward with
87.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa, since I'm getting a NODATA response for that name,
from the 233.202.162.in-addr.arpa zone, most probably because it's an empty
non-terminal. But what would be under that, and why?
uj4s5264...@networksolutionsprivateregistration.com please fix the servers
for sync-na.dyn.itg.com.
In message , Stephan
Lagerholm writes:
> I'm having trouble getting Bind to create a synthetic DNS64 response for
> sync-na.dyn.itg.com. although an A record exist. My Bind is configured
> with DN
You have the netblock 162.202.233.80-162.202.233.87 (162.202.233.80/29).
When software performs a reverse lookup it constructs a DNS name
from the address like 80.233.202.162.in-addr.arpa. Now as the
netblock is not a full /24 you either have to create 8 zones, one
for each PTR record, or provid
I'm having trouble getting Bind to create a synthetic DNS64 response for
sync-na.dyn.itg.com. although an A record exist. My Bind is configured
with DNS64:
dns64 64:ff9b::/96 { break-dnssec yes; };
The auth nameservers for the domain are busted for sure. They are
returning SERVFAIL for th
So if the DNS resolver used is "OK",
then is there a problem with my code for the in-addr.arpa zone
file? . . .rDNS is not working.
On 1/20/2017 10:19 AM, Bob Harold wrote:
On Fr
On 20.01.17 09:57, Ron Wingfield wrote:
I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I
cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Ron Wingfield
wrote:
> I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
> for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I
> cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
> SBCglobal.net, Comc
I manage delegated and not but ISP delegate (can do but is not forced to do it)
only if you own at least the C subnet (all).
If you only own some IP from a C subnet as DNS ZONEs on reverse lookups handle
an entire C subnet and can't be delegated only 3, 5, 10 IP from a subnet
so if you don't
Am 20.01.2017 um 16:57 schrieb Ron Wingfield:
I am having difficulty configuring reverse DNS. This has been a problem
for over a year between my server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I
cannot eMail to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL
I am having difficulty configuring reverse
DNS. This has been a problem for over a year between my
server(s) and my ISP, AT&T. Specifically, I cannot eMail
to any recipient that requires rDNS verification, e.g.,
SBCglobal.net, Comcast.net, or AOL. Very
13 matches
Mail list logo
