Mirsad Goran Todorovac writes:
> Dear All,
>
> In the past three days I have just made our domain DNSSEC
> signed. However, I seem to be missing something.
>
> When I query other DNS servers, like CloudFlare 1.0.0.1, I get the
> "ad" flag.
>
> But in my own domain, and my own domain servers, the
Dear All,
In the past three days I have just made our domain DNSSEC signed.
However, I seem to be missing something.
When I query other DNS servers, like CloudFlare 1.0.0.1, I get the "ad"
flag.
But in my own domain, and my own domain servers, the "ad" flag is still
missing:
Hi Klarstein,
Gathering the output of named statschannel should be good enough for initial
assessment (json please).
For 9.18, make sure the jemalloc is being used at runtime.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel
Can you please provide some commands whose output you are interested? I want to
collect the statistics for 9.16 before updating to 9.18.
Thanks
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von Petr
> Špacek
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2022 18:20
> An:
I suspect that you failed to copy the complete second record or that the
registrar failed to handle the optional white space in the last field. Without
you posting the contents of the dsset file and what you passed to the registrar
there is no way to know. There is also no way to know if it
Also please note that proper measurement of memory consumption is needed.
There’s some good (semi-accurate) stuff at SO and it needs to be correlated
with the statschannel output from named. Running “free” doesn’t measure memory
consumption by any program.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
I would be very interested in hearing more!
In majority of our internal testing 9.16 has higher memory consumption
than 9.18, especially when 9.18 is compiled with libjemalloc. And the
differences are not small, for some configurations it can be even 2x or
3x more on 9.16 than it is on 9.18.
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 2:41 PM frank picabia wrote:
> I've been using open source for decades. Long enough that I rarely need
> to use lists for help.
>
> Here's the RFC mentioning reserved domain name use:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606.html
>
Those reservations are for testing and
Hello,
Please find the details below.
Free command is used to check RAM available/used. space used is 50GB on
RHEL 7.9 in bind version 9.18.2 whereas in bind version 9.16.10 RAM
space used is 44 GB with the same amount of data and configuration.
free -g
totalused
Hi,
> 1) client asks Bind: what is NS for "cluster"?
> 2) Bind seems to issue requests to both "storage1" and "storage2" for "NS
> cluster", one of which always returns "REFUSED"
> 3) Answer of Bind to client does not contain the one that was "refused".
no, I think it’s different problem.
Hello,
We are currently working with a product called Superna Eyeglass which
can be used for DR purposes on Powerscale (Dell storages).
Quick background: Powerscale leverages DNS to create redundant and
load-balanced frontend access. Without going into many details,
Powerscale replies to
I remember we had similar issues with 9.18 (isc ppa packages) and hence wen't
back to 9.16. But I can not remember the details.
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von Ondrej
> Surý
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2022 08:37
> An: Raman kumar
> Cc:
You did not provided any details, so we can’t really help you.
What is “RAM consumption” anyway? VSZ, RSS, numbers pulled from stats channel
from named?
What’s the hardware, what is the configuration, how was BIND 9 compiled (or
packaged)?
The more details, the better
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
Hello Team,
While upgrading from BIND 9.16.10 to 9.18.2, we have observed high memory
consumption.
On version 9.16.2, RAM consumption was 3.8 GB. And on 9.18.2, RAM
consumption is 4.5 GB. Due to this an increase of approximately 20 % memory
is observed.
Is this the expected behaviour or any
14 matches
Mail list logo
