Additional info - general: warning: checkhints: unable to find root NS
'b.root-servers.new' in hints
I cant seem to find where the .new coming from...
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
The named.ca seems good.
;; ANSWER SECTION
Let me take a step back. The original problem is dig . would give
SERVFAIL instead of NOERROR. The . is pointed to named.ca which looks
normal.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I tried +trace from BIND server itself and still get the same
need to ask whomever manages that server.
Look at this line from your +trace output:
Received 405 bytes from 172.27.254.11#53(172.27.254.11) in 1 ms
Lyle
On 2/3/2015 1:13 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
Additional info - general: warning: checkhints: unable to find root NS
'b.root-servers.new
, Linux Addict
linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually I tried +trace from BIND server itself and still get the same
answer. I did dig . +trace @localhost
; DiG 9.7.0-P1 . +trace @localhost
;; global options: +cmd
. 346239 IN NS i.root-servers.new
that answer.
Is your machine/shop setup with private root servers?
Lyle
On 2/3/2015 12:50 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is
causing SERVFAIL for root query. Any ideas?
dig . +trace
; DiG 9.7.0-P1 . +trace
;; global options: +cmd
Thanks all for your inputs!!
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Robert Edmonds edmo...@mycre.ws wrote:
Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:50:14PM -0500, Linux Addict wrote:
I do dig . +trace and the results seem show .new servers. This is
causing SERVFAIL for root query
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
On 17/05/10 16:59, Arcan_- wrote:
Thanks for the reply.
Interesting. What's the use-case for this?
I have a few hundreds of dhcp clients and a two nodes pseudo cluster (for
the VIP).
I need a solution that
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Linux Addict wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.frwrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:25AM -0400,
Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.frwrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:27:25AM -0400,
Linux Addict linuxaddi...@gmail.com wrote
a message of 89 lines which said:
lacks EDNS, defaults to 512
DNS reply size limit is at least 490
Tested at 2010-05-04 14
Hello Folks, I got a strange issue going on..
I dig for a specific record against a ISP cache server , and the cache
server doesn't seem to see it, but When I do dig +any, then the record stays
in the cache for say 5minutes and then vanishes.
any idea?
~LA
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Prabhat Rana prana9...@yahoo.com wrote:
Also you may want to increase the File descriptor limits in /etc/service
file
* Set File descriptor (FD) limits
set rlim_fd_max=
Its /etc/system
--- On Thu, 2/26/09, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 jinmei_tat...@isc.org
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
jinmei_tat...@isc.orgwrote:
At Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:23:02 +0100,
Michelle Konzack linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net wrote:
Q 1:Which setting is missing?
Q2: Can someone tell me how to update a TXT record?
Please show named.conf of
Folks, I have BIND 9 running. For some reason, the external resolution is
not working. I can telnet to root servers on port 53. Recursion is on. What
are the other requiremnts for the server to reesolve the external records.
Please help!!
~LA
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
