I have been teaching informal DNS classes at work for decades, and I used to be
very careful to use “master” and “slave” and would include a section where I
pointed out that using “primary” and “secondary” instead was not correct. Then
about 10 years ago one person in class pointed out to me
Thanks. I have opened a ticket with AWS support asking them to allow us to pull
slave copies of our VPC-internal zones. If they don’t do that, then making the
zones slaves will not fix our problem, because the AWS endpoints refuse to
answer iterative queries.
Thanks,
Maria
> On Apr 7, 2020,
I had been told they tried that twice and in both cases the domain controller
would not let them add the conditional forwarder. On the strength of your
having said it worked in your situation, they tried again and now it is working.
Thank you!
Maria
> On Apr 6, 2020, at 11:37 AM, Chris Buxton
Currently our linux caching resolvers have a forwarding rule for
10.in-addr.arpa back to a small subset of our approximately 200 AD domain
controllers. We made it a stub zone at one point in the past, but ran into
intermittent resolution problems, although I don’t recall the details. We’ve
Hi,
In summary, my question is whether there is a way to configure a bind caching
server to provide recursion in response to iterative queries for records in a
forward type zone.
The background is that we have:
- AD domain controllers that are authoritative for all of 10.in-addr.arpa. in
our
Hey Kai,
> If I do a nslookup for one of the otto.de domains I reveive "** server
> can't find somehost.ov.otto.de: SERVFAIL"
The guideline behind the response-policy is that only an actual response gets
rewritten.
This is usually an answer from a recursive lookup.
If you don't get an answer,
P: 678-486-3516
C: 678-772-0018
F: 678-460-3603
E: jlight...@dsservices.com
-Original Message-
From: lists - euca [mailto:li...@euca.us]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:23 PM
To: Lightner, Jeff
Cc: Bind Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: stumped on sub domain addition
Thanks
Hello,
I added a sub domain to my zone file euca.us yesterday.
“onqsolutions”.
It first was added as a CNAME, then I couldn’t get it to work.. so now it is an
A record.
Still not working.
Can someone help troubleshoot?
onqsolutions.euca.us
TIA,
Donovan
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Melbinger Christian
christian.melbin...@wienit.at wrote:
Hi
** **
My company moved to a 2008R2 Domain Controller environment. Now I see the
following message in the windows log:
** **
*Title*: This domain controller must register its correct IP
Maybe a network/firewall issue? My results below.
dig +trace thisisgame.com
; DiG 9.8.0-P2 +trace thisisgame.com
;; global options: +cmd
. 432154 IN NS b.root-servers.net.
. 432154 IN NS l.root-servers.net.
.
IN A 1.234.35.120
thisisgame.com. 1800IN NS ns1.thisisgame.com.
;; Received 82 bytes from 1.234.35.141#53(ns1.thisisgame.com) in 187 ms
-Will
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Will Lists listsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe a network/firewall issue? My results
Site is based in Korea based on the IP and whois, so it does sound like
some sort of access controls are in place on one end or the other. I was
able to access the site.
-Will
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Jan-Piet Mens jpmens@gmail.com wrote:
I have found that www.thisisgame.com
We recently tried a test to see how our internal servers would react to a
loss of their external peers, with the goal being that the internal servers
would switch from forwarding to doing recursive queries for clients.
Normally, the internal servers forward to the external servers. To
simulate
records. Forward only will only use forwarders.
The delay you are seeing is likely the delay in exhausting the forwarders
before attempting the roots.
-Ben Croswell
On Nov 1, 2011 9:23 AM, Will Lists listsw...@gmail.com wrote:
We recently tried a test to see how our internal servers would
of
the forwarders may be the quickest way to restore service.
-Ben Croswell
On Nov 1, 2011 10:03 AM, Will Lists listsw...@gmail.com wrote:
Ben,
I seem to recall reading at some point in the past that after X amount of
time, BIND would stop trying to contact servers it figured to be dead
I had a very similar issue recently, but it was with secondaries on Windows
Server 2008 R2 and not stub zones. We actually went to stub zones
afterwards to prevent the issue from happening again, hopefully.
The issue was that a machine had done DCHP and gotten the DDNS created
A/TXT/PTR
On 26 November2009, at 07:00, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Also, you could organize the zone files (manually) so that they spread
over many directories instead of one.
I've heard that compiling the zones first (named-compilezone?) is a big help in
this situation; I can't vouch for it though.
Thanks Chris.
I had actually tried that, but it turned out Windows wasn't answering
reverse queries properly so I didn't notice when I had got it right. Once
your post pointed out that was the way to go, I got Wireshark on it and
quickly noticed Windows was also at fault.
One further thing,
18 matches
Mail list logo