Re: Glue records for secondary NS

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > There are other cases where glue is necessary. RFC 1034 unfortunately > does not list them. It only lists the most obvious case. > > Good point. Of course, the general principle is to avoid cyclic dependencies and simplify/minimize your r

Re: Glue records for secondary NS

In message , Casey Deccio writes: > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz > wrote: > > > I have 3 secondaries run by other domains. This was to give me some > > geo-diversity. How do I create glue records for them? My registrar only > > lets me create glue records within my do

Re: Glue records for secondary NS

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 12/05/2014 12:30 PM, Casey Deccio wrote: > > Short answer: you don't need, nor should you configure glue, for the > servers run by the other domains. > > > It would be nice, then, if all these DNS tool sites would know this and > not

Re: Glue records for secondary NS

On 12/05/2014 12:30 PM, Casey Deccio wrote: On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz > wrote: I have 3 secondaries run by other domains. This was to give me some geo-diversity. How do I create glue records for them? My registrar only lets me

Re: Glue records for secondary NS

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have 3 secondaries run by other domains. This was to give me some > geo-diversity. How do I create glue records for them? My registrar only > lets me create glue records within my domain (the web form pre-provides the > domain part o

Glue records for secondary NS

I just found out that I had old garbage in my rgistrar setup for my domain. To wit, an NS server that has not been an NS server for years. And now that I use that host name for another usage on another address, it was giving lots of problems. My bad, I should have caught this when I moved Re