Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-16 Thread Warren Kumari
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Simon si...@bk.it.cx wrote: Hi, sure it is. Here a more detailed version: http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html RR usually results in roughly equal load

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-16 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.884.1326738053.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Simon si...@bk.it.cx wrote: Hi, sure it is. Here a

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-16 Thread Sten Carlsen
On 16/01/12 20:52, Barry Margolin wrote: In article mailman.884.1326738053.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote: On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Simon si...@bk.it.cx

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-16 Thread Dave Sparro
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote: One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the otherŠ www.example.com  IN  A  192.168.1.1 www.example.com  IN  A  192.168.1.2 www.example.com  IN  A  192.168.1.3 www.example.com  IN  A  

RE: load balance of DNS

2012-01-16 Thread Todd Snyder
do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND? One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the otherŠ www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3 www.example.com IN A 192.168.2.1 Bind

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-16 Thread Warren Kumari
On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Todd Snyder wrote: do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND? One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the otherŠ www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3

load balance of DNS

2012-01-13 Thread MyDots.net
Hi, Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for load balancing a special record? for example, www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 I want the first one to get more web traffic than the second one. I know other 4 or 7 layer software

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-13 Thread Simon
Hi, sure it is. Here a more detailed version: http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html Regards, Simon On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:40:31 +0800, MyDots.net wrote: Hi, Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for load balancing a special record? for example,

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 13.01.12 22:40, MyDots.net wrote: Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for load balancing a special record? for example, www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 kind of. I want the first one to get more web traffic than the

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-13 Thread David Klein
With stock DNS, no; all you can do is recommend by ordering the responses. But there are solutions. There are load-balancing DNS servers (they have a pool of responses, and hand out an answer of that pool, based on rules, and can even remove an answer from the pool if a watchdog/monitor fails). F5

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-13 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.827.1326466398.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote: On 13.01.12 22:40, MyDots.net wrote: Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for load balancing a special record? for example, www.example.com IN A

Re: load balance of DNS

2012-01-13 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org, Simon si...@bk.it.cx wrote: Hi, sure it is. Here a more detailed version: http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html RR usually results in roughly equal load balancing. He said he wants one of the addresses to get MORE