On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Simon si...@bk.it.cx wrote:
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a more detailed version:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
RR usually results in roughly equal load
In article mailman.884.1326738053.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Simon si...@bk.it.cx wrote:
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a
On 16/01/12 20:52, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.884.1326738053.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Simon si...@bk.it.cx
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Barry Margolin bar...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the
otherŠ
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3
www.example.com IN A
do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND?
One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than
the otherŠ
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3
www.example.com IN A 192.168.2.1
Bind
On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Todd Snyder wrote:
do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND?
One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than
the otherŠ
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3
Hi,
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
I want the first one to get more web traffic than the second one.
I know other 4 or 7 layer software
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a more detailed version:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:40:31 +0800, MyDots.net wrote:
Hi,
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
On 13.01.12 22:40, MyDots.net wrote:
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
kind of.
I want the first one to get more web traffic than the
With stock DNS, no; all you can do is recommend by ordering the responses.
But there are solutions. There are load-balancing DNS servers (they have a
pool of responses, and hand out an answer of that pool, based on rules, and
can even remove an answer from the pool if a watchdog/monitor fails). F5
In article mailman.827.1326466398.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 13.01.12 22:40, MyDots.net wrote:
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
www.example.com IN A
In article mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Simon si...@bk.it.cx wrote:
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a more detailed version:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
RR usually results in roughly equal load balancing. He said he wants
one of the addresses to get MORE
12 matches
Mail list logo