In article mailman.5.1320639019.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Transfer graph loops prevent expire working as a safeguard against
loss of connectivity to the master source.
Some people may consider that a feature.
Of course, they could also just set the
On 11/05/2011 01:32 PM, Felix New wrote:
if i have several master servers, whether i must ensure that all the
master server's serial are the same? i think this is a little complex,
in particular zone is updated by dynamic update(In such a scenario, the
serial number is controled by every single
On Nov 5 2011, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 11/5/2011 4:21 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote:
How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
might get overwritten by another?
The use of the word masters in the configuration of a slave zone is a
bit misleading. Under most
How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
might get overwritten by another?
Regards,
Kalpesh
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Anand Buddhdev ana...@ripe.net wrote:
On 03/11/2011 23:14, hugo hugoo wrote:
Hi Hugo,
I have seen that for a slave zone, it is
On 05/11/2011 09:21, kalpesh varyani wrote:
How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
might get overwritten by another?
Why would anyone run multiple masters with differing zone contents?
Anand
___
Please visit
On 11/05/2011 08:21 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote:
How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
might get overwritten by another?
The zone serial number is checked, and a transfer is only done if the
serial is higher than the local one. It is assumed the zone admin
On 11/5/2011 4:21 AM, kalpesh varyani wrote:
How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
might get overwritten by another?
The use of the word masters in the configuration of a slave zone is a
bit misleading. Under most circumstances, you list the authoritative
On 11/05/11 03:21, kalpesh varyani wrote:
How does this feature address the risk that data provided by one master
might get overwritten by another?
Regards,
Kalpesh
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Anand Buddhdev ana...@ripe.net
mailto:ana...@ripe.net wrote:
On 03/11/2011 23:14, hugo hugoo
if i have several master servers, whether i must ensure that all the master
server's serial are the same? i think this is a little complex, in
particular zone is updated by dynamic update(In such a scenario, the serial
number is controled by every single bind).
is it correct?
2011/11/5 Alan
On 11/5/2011 9:32 AM, Felix New wrote:
if i have several master servers, whether i must ensure that all the
master server's serial are the same? i think this is a little complex,
in particular zone is updated by dynamic update(In such a scenario, the
serial number is controled by every single
Hello,
I have seen that for a slave zone, it is possible to configure several master
IP's.
Why this possibility?
How does it works if several master zone can be used for the zone transfer?
Thanks for any feedback,
Hugo,
On 03/11/2011 23:14, hugo hugoo wrote:
Hi Hugo,
I have seen that for a slave zone, it is possible to configure several master
IP's.
Why this possibility?
How does it works if several master zone can be used for the zone transfer?
This allows for resiliency. In case one of the master
12 matches
Mail list logo
