At Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:27:01 +0400,
Samer Khattab skhat...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using Bind as a caching name server and serving around 2000 req per
second, and recently have the following messages showing up from time to
time in the general.log.
27-Sep-2010 10:45:47.639 sockmgr
On 27.09.10 19:38, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Under certain limited circumstances, it might make more sense to put
both/all addresses under the same name, and then use the sortlist
mechanism to present those addresses in an order which is suitable for
particular clients.
certain? I'd say under
This is more of a registry/registrar question than a BIND/DNS question.
About the only _generic_ advice I can give you -- since you obscured the
domain names and the relevant addresses, so I can't actually check
anything on my own -- is to query the .eu servers directly for the
delegation
I was about to ask again, but figured I had better check isc.org first.
Behold:
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/972-p2
FYI.
Thanks.
- Original Message
From: Hauke Lampe la...@hauke-lampe.de
To: Larissa Shapiro laris...@isc.org; bind-us...@isc.org
Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010
Introduction
BIND 9.7.2-P2 is a maintenance release for BIND 9.7.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.7.1 to BIND 9.7.2-P2.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a complete
list of all changes.
Download
The latest release of BIND 9 software can
Security Advisory Regarding Unexpected ACL Behavior in BIND 9.7.2
Description: There was a flaw where the wrong ACL was applied. This
flaw could allow access to a cache via recursion even though the ACL
disallowed it.
CVE: pending
CERT: pending
Posting date: 2010-09-28
Program
BIND 9.4-ESV-R3 is now available.
BIND 9.4-ESV-R3 is revision 2 of the extended release version
for BIND 9.4. It addresses a bug introduced in BIND 9.4-ESV-R1
and is recommend for anyone running BIND 9.4-ESV-R1.
BIND 9.4-ESV-R3 can be downloaded from
BIND 9.6-ESV-R2 is now available.
BIND 9.6-ESV-R2 is revision 1 of the extended release version
for BIND 9.6.
BIND 9.6-ESV-R2 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6-ESV-R2/bind-9.6-ESV-R2.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is
I have just installed bind on a CentOS 5 machine but it won't start
without /etc/named.conf:
[r...@venus etc]# /etc/init.d/named start
Locating //etc/named.conf failed:
[FAILED]
[r...@venus etc]# touch /etc/named.conf
[r...@venus etc]#
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:49, Imri Zvik im...@inter.net.il wrote:
What are you trying to achieve? An empty named.conf file means named will
use defaults for everything, and will probably just work out-of-the-box (as
a simple resolver) so you should give more information about the goal and
On 9/27/2010 8:48 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
I run a number of internal clients on 10 address space. what i did was break up
each Zone into Class B's 10.1.x.x , 10.2.x.x then my forward and reverse files
into class C's. Each record 10.1.1.x . 10.1.2.x, 10.1.3.x, . then scale ass
needed.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 20:30, Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote:
About the only _generic_ advice I can give you -- since you obscured the
domain names and the relevant addresses, so I can't actually check anything
on my own -- is to query the .eu servers directly for the delegation
records.
Hello,
Trying to upgrade to Bind-9.7.2-P2 on an older Linux system.
Can't locate warnings.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.00503
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 .) at ./bindkeys.pl line 20.
BEGIN
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, michael mteic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 02:34, michael a écrit :
Hello,
Trying to upgrade to Bind-9.7.2-P2 on an older Linux system.
Can't locate warnings.pm
In message aanlktinsxc4fepygl2jso8p0zngxsuivp32z9jcxx...@mail.gmail.com, mich
ael writes:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, michael mteic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, fakessh fake...@fakessh.eu wrote:
Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 02:34, michael a
Hello Mark,
Thanks for the reply!
I will try in a few hours --with-make-clean=no
Thanks,
Michael...
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message aanlktinsxc4fepygl2jso8p0zngxsuivp32z9jcxx...@mail.gmail.com,
mich
ael writes:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10
Hello Mark,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:53 PM, michael mteic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Mark,
Thanks for the reply!
I will try in a few hours --with-make-clean=no
Thanks,
Michael...
Success!
Thanks for the answer as well as many years of a great product!!
Michael...
On Tue, Sep 28,
Hi everyone...
I am rather new to the world of DNS so I¹m hoping to get some of your
expertise...
Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence? For example, if
I assign 2 IP addresses to an A record, is it possible to have it respond
like...
Client 1 for www.example.com -
18 matches
Mail list logo
