I¹m sorry. A little typo for my example. I meant to say...
Client 1 for www.example.com -> 192.168.1.1
Client 2 for www.example.com -> 192.168.1.2
Client 3 for www.example.com -> 192.168.1.1
...and so on.
Thanks,
SW
On 9/29/10 12:37 PM, "SW" wrote:
> Hi everyone...
>
> I am rather new to t
Hi everyone...
I am rather new to the world of DNS so I¹m hoping to get some of your
expertise...
Is there a way to make BIND respond DNS query in sequence? For example, if
I assign 2 IP addresses to an A record, is it possible to have it respond
like...
Client 1 for www.example.com -> 192.168.
Hello Mark,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:53 PM, michael wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> Thanks for the reply!
>
> I will try in a few hours --with-make-clean=no
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael...
Success!
Thanks for the answer as well as many years of a great product!!
Michael...
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6
Hello Mark,
Thanks for the reply!
I will try in a few hours --with-make-clean=no
Thanks,
Michael...
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message ,
> mich
> ael writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, michael wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:0
In message , mich
ael writes:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, michael wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, fakessh wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 02:34, michael a =E9crit=A0:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Trying to upgrade to Bind-9.7.2-P2 on an older Linux system.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, fakessh wrote:
>> Le mercredi 29 septembre 2010 02:34, michael a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Trying to upgrade to Bind-9.7.2-P2 on an older Linux system.
>>>
>>> Can't locate warnings.pm in @INC (@INC con
Hello,
Trying to upgrade to Bind-9.7.2-P2 on an older Linux system.
Can't locate warnings.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.00503/i386-linux /usr/lib/perl5/5.00503
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005 .) at ./bindkeys.pl line 20.
BEGIN failed--compila
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 20:30, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> About the only _generic_ advice I can give you -- since you obscured the
> domain names and the relevant addresses, so I can't actually check anything
> on my own -- is to query the .eu servers directly for the delegation
> records. It's possible
On 9/27/2010 8:48 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
I run a number of internal clients on 10 address space. what i did was break up
each Zone into Class B's 10.1.x.x , 10.2.x.x then my forward and reverse files
into class C's. Each record 10.1.1.x . 10.1.2.x, 10.1.3.x, . then scale ass
needed. pro
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 23:49, Imri Zvik wrote:
> What are you trying to achieve? An empty named.conf file means named will
> use defaults for everything, and will probably just work out-of-the-box (as
> a simple resolver) so you should give more information about the goal and
> problem (including
What are you trying to achieve? An empty named.conf file means named will
use defaults for everything, and will probably just work out-of-the-box (as
a simple resolver) so you should give more information about the goal and
problem (including log entries, troubleshooting data etc.).
-Origina
I have just installed bind on a CentOS 5 machine but it won't start
without /etc/named.conf:
[r...@venus etc]# /etc/init.d/named start
Locating //etc/named.conf failed:
[FAILED]
[r...@venus etc]# touch /etc/named.conf
[r...@venus etc]# /et
BIND 9.6-ESV-R2 is now available.
BIND 9.6-ESV-R2 is revision 1 of the extended release version
for BIND 9.6.
BIND 9.6-ESV-R2 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.6-ESV-R2/bind-9.6-ESV-R2.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is
BIND 9.4-ESV-R3 is now available.
BIND 9.4-ESV-R3 is revision 2 of the extended release version
for BIND 9.4. It addresses a bug introduced in BIND 9.4-ESV-R1
and is recommend for anyone running BIND 9.4-ESV-R1.
BIND 9.4-ESV-R3 can be downloaded from
Security Advisory Regarding Unexpected ACL Behavior in BIND 9.7.2
Description: There was a flaw where the wrong ACL was applied. This
flaw could allow access to a cache via recursion even though the ACL
disallowed it.
CVE: pending
CERT: pending
Posting date: 2010-09-28
Program Impacte
Introduction
BIND 9.7.2-P2 is a maintenance release for BIND 9.7.
This document summarizes changes from BIND 9.7.1 to BIND 9.7.2-P2.
Please see the CHANGES file in the source code release for a complete
list of all changes.
Download
The latest release of BIND 9 software can alwa
I was about to ask again, but figured I had better check isc.org first.
Behold:
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/972-p2
FYI.
Thanks.
- Original Message
From: Hauke Lampe
To: Larissa Shapiro ; bind-us...@isc.org
Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010 1:07:39 PM
Subject: Re: Notice regarding B
This is more of a registry/registrar question than a BIND/DNS question.
About the only _generic_ advice I can give you -- since you obscured the
domain names and the relevant addresses, so I can't actually check
anything on my own -- is to query the .eu servers directly for the
delegation reco
On 27.09.10 19:38, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> Under certain limited circumstances, it might make more sense to put
> both/all addresses under the same name, and then use the "sortlist"
> mechanism to present those addresses in an order which is suitable for
> particular clients.
certain? I'd say u
19 matches
Mail list logo
