On 22 Jan 2011, at 18:29, jeffreyp wrote:
it's the transfers that are not happening. and, specifically, just the
transfers of the internal view to the slave on the different subnet.
You've mentioned that the slave receives and logs the NOTIFY.
Do you see it (trying to) start
On 25/01/11 11:20 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message c964b3cd.13a61%kalman.fe...@melbourneit.com.au, Kalman Feher
write
s:
On 25/01/11 4:10 PM, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote:
On 1/25/2011 9:51 AM, Kalman Feher wrote:
If the nsec3param has been removed, the
On 01/25/2011 01:34 PM, Henry Hartley wrote:
On 1/25/2011 10:40 AM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-01-25 10:18 Henry Hartley napisał(a):
Should I be able to do what I'm trying to do?
If you have a web panel to configure your hosting, look for something
named
alternative domain names, aliases,
In message 20110126003702.c16...@gwyn.tux.org, Joseph S D Yao writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
Hello,
From what version of bind we won't include the root hints file in
named.conf? Since the bind server has been including it inherently.
Please excuse my prior noise. Fat finger and head replied to wrong email. But
feel free to call if you feel the need ;-)
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message 20110126003702.c16...@gwyn.tux.org, Joseph S D Yao writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM
Tried both numbers.
I'm available 602-418-6471.
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:49 AM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
In message 20110126003702.c16...@gwyn.tux.org, Joseph S D Yao writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
Hello,
From what version of
p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
Gary Wallis writes:
Do not confuse your forwarding with HTTP rewriting.
One is just about DNS records (CNAME, A or otherwise.) The other
happens on the server side (see Apache rewrite engine docs.)
This is nothing about rewrite, but webserver's virtual host
On 26-Jan-2011, at 5:21 PM, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2011-01-26 00:21 Eivind Olsen napisał(a):
Is it possible to globally set (override) the default TTL for all zones
and their subsequent records?
You're thinking about the authoritative zones you host? I am not aware of
any such setting,
In article mailman.1454.1295874574.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
On 24.01.11 17:13, rams wrote:
y resolver is returning multiple CNAMEs for same hostname. But I believe
CNAME should not return same hostname with multiple values.
correct.
On Jan 26 2011, Joseph S D Yao wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:20:18AM +0800, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
Hello,
From what version of bind we won't include the root hints file in
named.conf? Since the bind server has been including it inherently.
I could be wrong, but I think that
On 1/25/2011 9:40 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
I'm reading the document Secure DNS Deployment Guide got from the
URL a poster gave in the list.
The document said:
When a user types the URL www.example.com into a Web browser, the
browser program contacts a type of resolver called a stub
The document is a little sloppy. In addition to the mis-description of
the DNS resolver algorithm, already noted in a previous post, the part
in Section 8.1.2 about restricting zone transfers -- These restrictions
address [...] potential exploits from unrestricted dissemination of
information
Chris Thompson writes:
The relevant CHANGES file entry for BIND 9 would seem to be
701. [func] Root hints are now fully optional. Class IN
views use compiled-in hints by default, as
before. Non-IN views with no root hints now
provide
When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind.
is it bind or Bind or BIND? is bind an abbreviation word?
Thanks.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:02 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind.
is it bind or Bind or BIND? is bind an abbreviation word?
Yes, BIND is an acronym for Berkeley Internet Name Daemon.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
Mark Andrews writes:
In message 20110127020201.861a52d...@mail.nsbeta.info, p...@mail.nsbeta.info
writes:
When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind.
is it bind or Bind or BIND? is bind an abbreviation word?
BIND stands for Berkley Internet Name Domain.
Greetings
it has been a while since I have worked with named, and Ive seemed to wrap
myself in a key confusion.
I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which gave me a
new key in /etc/rndc.key.
so now rndc works fine.
but when looked at /etc/rndc.conf the key was
On 1/26/2011 9:22 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jan 26, 2011, at 6:02 PM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind.
is it bind or Bind or BIND? is bind an abbreviation word?
Yes, BIND is an acronym for Berkeley Internet Name Daemon.
In message 20110127020201.861a52d...@mail.nsbeta.info, p...@mail.nsbeta.info
writes:
When talk to others, I never describe it clearly for naming bind.
is it bind or Bind or BIND? is bind an abbreviation word?
BIND stands for Berkley Internet Name Domain.
Thanks.
The keyname and keyvalue in named.conf, rndc.key and rndc.conf have to be
the same. For me I don't have the rndc.key file,but have the left two.
Surely the keyname/keyvalue in these files should be the same.
Regards.
donovan jeffrey j writes:
Greetings
it has been a while since I have
On 27-Jan-2011, at 10:39 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
Greetings
it has been a while since I have worked with named, and Ive seemed to wrap
myself in a key confusion.
I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which gave me a
new key in /etc/rndc.key.
so now rndc
On 1/26/2011 9:39 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which
gave me a new key in /etc/rndc.key. so now rndc works fine.
but when looked at /etc/rndc.conf the key was different than the
/etc/rndc.key. i thought they had to be the same
On Jan 26, 2011, at 9:50 PM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 1/26/2011 9:39 PM, donovan jeffrey j wrote:
I had some issue with an invalid key so i ran rndc-confgen -a which
gave me a new key in /etc/rndc.key. so now rndc works fine.
but when looked at /etc/rndc.conf the key was different than the
Hi ,
Please remove my mail ID from the list.
Thanks
Rohit Juneja
=-=-=
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
R Juneja writes:
Hi ,
Please remove my mail ID from the list.
Unsubscribe yourself from here:
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Yes, BIND is an acronym for Berkeley Internet Name Daemon.
Berkeley Internet Name Domain.
Perhaps you're both right, sort of.
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/whatis :
The name BIND stands for Berkeley Internet Name Daemon
Wikipedia also mentions both versions of the name, on
26 matches
Mail list logo
