Mart van de Wege mvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
A lot of the refresh failure logging happens at debug level 1 so you can
get more details by running `rndc trace 1`.
Is there a way to filter that after setting it?
Not without altering the server's logging configuration. Something like
the
Edward DeLargy eddela...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
The README says:
Building
BIND 9 currently requires a UNIX system with an ANSI C compiler,
basic POSIX support, and a 64 bit integer type.
We've had successful builds and
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Edward DeLargy eddela...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
The README says:
Building
BIND 9 currently requires a UNIX system with an ANSI C compiler,
basic POSIX
Dave Warren da...@hireahit.com wrote:
On 2014-05-08 15:09, Mark Andrews wrote:
But that does not help when you want a MX record at the apex or
some other record at the apex.
I'd argue that it does -- Since the record is now CNAME'd, the MX record is
now under the control of the
I’ve been building bind on AIX for years with no problems. I’ve had successful
builds of 9.9.5 with both GCC and XLC.
Tedd
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Edward DeLargy
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:40 PM
To:
Thank you! I figured that but given some of the oddities of six wasn't sure.
Regards,
Ed
Sent from my iPhone
On May 9, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Edward DeLargy eddela...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
The README says:
Edward DeLargy eddela...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
The README says:
We've had successful builds and tests on the following systems:
...
Fedora Core 6
Currently, some of the systems that we automatically build and run
various tests on include:
FreeBSD 4.11 i386
FreeBSD 6.3 i386
FreeBSD 8.4 i386
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386
Fedora 18 Linux 3.8.1-201.fc18.x86_64 x86_64
Fedora 19 Linux 3.11.6-200.fc19.x86_64 x86_64
HPUX B11.11 HPPA2.0w (HP
Thank you all for your quick response I do appreciate it!!
Regards,
Ed
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha w...@fajar.net wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
Edward DeLargy eddela...@gmail.com wrote:
I just want to verify that 9.9.5
O.S. Windows 2008 R2 64 bit. Up to now I have used Bind 32 bit, now I see that
a 64 bit version is available.
Should I move to 64 bit version ? If yes is there any how to doc ?
Giovanni Paterno
___
Please visit
In message c2b3930fd9ce014d9ddacf994b672c9f55d0c...@atlas2.dcsos-m.dcsos.it,
Giovanni Paterno' writes:
O.S. Windows 2008 R2 64 bit. Up to now I have used Bind 32 bit, now I see t=
hat a 64 bit version is available.
Should I move to 64 bit version ? If yes is there any how to doc ?
Giovanni
Thanks for your reply.
Regards
Giovanni Paterno
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Inviato: venerdì 9 maggio 2014 17.46
A: Giovanni Paterno'
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Oggetto: Re: Bind 9.10 64 bit
In message
Rich, you and Barry both touched on my original tactic. I can define
³something.xyz.com² as a master zone with a single entry. The problem, as
you pointed out, is that this doesn¹t catch ³www.something.xyz.com².
Unfortunately, the ³www² section will have any number of random hosts, so
putting
(Sorry, let's try that again WITHOUT smart quotes:)
Rich, you and Barry both touched on my original tactic. I can define
something.xyz.com as a master zone with a single entry. The problem, as
you pointed out, is that this doesn't catch www.something.xyz.com.
Unfortunately, the www section will
On 09/05/2014 18:47, Jon Fullmer wrote:
(Sorry, let's try that again WITHOUT smart quotes:)
Yeaaahhh that did not work out so well:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5
Your apostrophes ended up being a chinese character, CJK UNIFIED
IDEOGRAPH-6613 according to Python's unicodedata.
On 5/9/2014 6:59 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
Dave Warren da...@hireahit.com wrote:
On 2014-05-08 15:09, Mark Andrews wrote:
But that does not help when you want a MX record at the apex or
some other record at the apex.
I'd argue that it does -- Since the record is now CNAME'd, the MX record is
now
On 5/9/14, 2:06 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
If you have a suggestion for an important or popular OS version I should
add to our build farm, please let me know why.
I have one suggestion: get a Raspberry PI and build/run on it (the
usual OS is Debian - 'Raspbian', but people run a variety of
...if anyone has specific
thoughts on how to make this sort of thing easier in BIND -- even
just at
the level of boy, it irritates me that I can't make BIND do X --
such comments will fall on welcoming ears.
I agree that it would be nice if effort were made into making flipping
masters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:28 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
We didn't get a OPT record in response to a EDNS query. and also
says We need to drop/remove the logging here when we have more
experience.
Is there a sample dig query that can reproduce
On 5/9/2014 3:01 PM, John Wobus wrote:
...if anyone has specific
thoughts on how to make this sort of thing easier in BIND -- even
just at
the level of boy, it irritates me that I can't make BIND do X --
such comments will fall on welcoming ears.
I agree that it would be nice if effort were
On 5/8/2014 5:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
DNSMadeEasy calls this an ANAME record, internally they just lookup
the destination's IP and cache it, updating it as needed.
It works, but it would be nice if this could be done in DNS. Sadly, it
can't, and probably won't in our lifetimes.
I do a
On 05/07/14 23:32, Barry Margolin wrote:
In article mailman.160.1399503258.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. lkc...@ksu.edu wrote:
Oh...I misread the questionguess DNAME isn't what's wanted
just the apex to somewhere else
Yeah...I currently just look
In message 1399664632.4864.59.ca...@ns.five-ten-sg.com, Carl Byington writes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:28 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
We didn't get a OPT record in response to a EDNS query. and also
says We need to drop/remove the logging
On 05/08/14 02:01, Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-05-07 15:54, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
Though it was just a minor delayfor them to revert back to the old site,
until they migrated their email accounts to the CNAME site as well
You still can't CNAME the APEX of a zone even if
On 09-May-14 14:53, Alan Clegg wrote:
I do, but I don't have early access, so other than a brief yep, it
works, I can't get it into the README. 8-)
I'm glad that you make that effort.
I was responding to Jeremy's solicitation for suggestions on what
should be done more officially/thoroughly.
25 matches
Mail list logo
