> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:02:29 -0800 (PST)
> From: Pamela Rock
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 12/28/09, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > From: Mark Andrews
> > Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> > To: "Pamela Rock"
> > Cc: "Kevin Oberman" , "Chuck Anderson" ,
> > bind-users@lists.isc.org
> > Date: Monday, December
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Mark Andrews wrote:
> From: Mark Andrews
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: "Kevin Oberman" , "Chuck Anderson" ,
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 8:22 PM
>
> In message <475084.65186...@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>,
> Pamela
In message <475084.65186...@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, Pamela Rock writes:
> This query is to anyone in general, based on the previous dig statement, do=
> es the following command make sense??
>
> dig -6 www.es.net @some:ipv6:address +tcp
>
> I'm wondering if the combination of -6, @some:ip
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> From: Kevin Oberman
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org, "Chuck Anderson"
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 6:07 PM
> > Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:50
> -0800 (PST)
> > From: Pamela Rock
> > Sender: bind-u
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:50 -0800 (PST)
> From: Pamela Rock
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> --- On Mon, 12/28/09, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> > From: Chuck Anderson
> > Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> > Date: Monday, December 28, 2009,
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> From: Chuck Anderson
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 3:58 PM
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:56:56AM
> -0800, Pamela Rock wrote:
> > I posted this query a while ago but have not yet been
> able
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:56:56AM -0800, Pamela Rock wrote:
> I posted this query a while ago but have not yet been able to resolve the
> issue...
>
> I have a DNS server and client that can ping each other using ping6. The
> following query works:
>
> dig -6 test.com +notcp
>
> When I quer
MontyRee wrote:
>
>
> So thanks for your kind reply.
>
> I'm curious the meaning of "given name".
> if clients query like below,
>
> # example.com zone
>
> abc.example.com/A
> www.abc.example.com/A
> exmaple.com/MX
The above are all different
To be 'the same' both the label (e.g. abc
IPTables and IP6Tables are turned off and not running. There is no other
firewalls or filtering routers between DNS clients and servers.
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Rick Dicaire wrote:
> From: Rick Dicaire
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Monday,
So thanks for your kind reply.
I'm curious the meaning of "given name".
if clients query like below,
# example.com zone
abc.example.com/A
www.abc.example.com/A
exmaple.com/MX
above queries are same query or diffferent one?
and is there any method that which
name queries are much?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Pamela Rock wrote:
> When I query TCP with IPv6 I get the following error:
Check client machine firewall.
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
http://www.ardynet.com
http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u
__
I posted this query a while ago but have not yet been able to resolve the
issue...
I have a DNS server and client that can ping each other using ping6. The
following query works:
dig -6 test.com +notcp
When I query TCP with IPv6 I get the following error:
r...@test:/home/janderson/bind-9.6.
On 28.12.09 12:36, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Applications that fail to try multiple address are broken. RFC 1123
> said as much back in October 1989 (over twenty years ago now). With
> IPv6 coming along almost every host will be multihomed and if a
> application doesn't cope then you should report it
13 matches
Mail list logo
