faster fail-over between multiple masters

Hi! I have 9.7.0-P1 as slave configured with two masters: M1 and M2. M2 is currently down. When M1 sends a NOTIFY to inform the salve of the new zone, bind starts querying for the SOA record at M2. As M2 is down, bind sends retransmissions and tries it several times. It takes up to 2 minutes

Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

Hello everybody, I would like to use DDNS updates for the certain zone. But I also want to configure a part of it statically. However, BIND makes a big mess-up in my zone file after several dynamic updates, which makes editing it not very handy. I also can't add any static record because they

Re: Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

A zone is atomically either static or dynamic. There is no mix. You can freeze a dynamic zone, rendering it temporarily static, and then hand-edit the zone file. This has several side effects, including that incoming updates are dropped while the zone is frozen. You can consider breaking the

Re: Separating zone file for static usage and DDNS

A zone is atomically either static or dynamic. There is no mix. Seems it's the matter of the way of implementation, not the RFCs' restrictions, doesn't it? Why don't propose it for implementing then? 2011/8/29 Chris Buxton chris.p.bux...@gmail.com A zone is atomically either static or

Re: faster fail-over between multiple masters

In message 4e5b6098.80...@pernau.at, Klaus Darilion writes: Hi! I have 9.7.0-P1 as slave configured with two masters: M1 and M2. M2 is currently down. When M1 sends a NOTIFY to inform the salve of the new zone, bind starts querying for the SOA record at M2. As M2 is down, bind sends

slow non-cached quries

Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server have slow response time for the non-cached entries. I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result ; DiG 9.8.0-P2 @127.0.0.1 www.google.com +trace ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd . 2013 IN

Re: Max number of views and performance.

I think in use views with diferent zones files, all for same domain, no recursive querys, one view for each network/AS that my bgp router know. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:36 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.skwrote: 24.08.2011 08:04, sky shade пишет: I like to know if bind 9.8 have a

Re: slow non-cached quries

In message CAAKgOtgoifGPNEpHtX7++w=cze1dpxx2degq1ppkz18dpuf...@mail.gmail.com, TMK writes: Dears, Probably this the thousand time you get these question. but our bind server have slow response time for the non-cached entries. I have run dig with +trace option and below is the result ;