Hello.
I am trying to compile DLZ drivers with --with-dlopen=yes so no DLZ is
compiled statically in bind. But there is a problem if I compile bind
with --prefix=/opt/bind9 . The Makefiles of DLZ's does not have options
to specify this path. Only manual editing of the Makefiles can do the
tri
On 09-May-14 14:53, Alan Clegg wrote:
> I do, but I don't have "early access", so other than a brief "yep, it
> works", I can't get it into the README. 8-)
I'm glad that you make that effort.
I was responding to Jeremy's solicitation for suggestions on what
should be done more officially/thorou
On 05/08/14 02:01, Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2014-05-07 15:54, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
>
>> Though it was just a minor delayfor them to revert back to the old site,
>> until they migrated their email accounts to the CNAME site as well
>
> You still can't CNAME the APEX of a zone
In message <1399664632.4864.59.ca...@ns.five-ten-sg.com>, Carl Byington writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:28 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > "We didn't get a OPT record in response to a EDNS query." and also
> > says "We need to drop/remove th
On 05/07/14 23:32, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." wrote:
>
>> Oh...I misread the questionguess DNAME isn't what's wanted
>>
>> just the apex to somewhere else
>>
>> Yeah...I currently just look up the name and enter A records. But, I've
>> wonder
On 5/8/2014 5:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
DNSMadeEasy calls this an "ANAME" record, internally they just lookup
the destination's IP and cache it, updating it as needed.
It works, but it would be nice if this could be done in DNS. Sadly, it
can't, and probably won't in our lifetimes.
I do a simil
On 5/9/2014 3:01 PM, John Wobus wrote:
...if anyone has specific
thoughts on how to make this sort of thing easier in BIND -- even
just at
the level of "boy, it irritates me that I can't make BIND do " --
such comments will fall on welcoming ears.
I agree that it would be nice if effort were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:28 -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> "We didn't get a OPT record in response to a EDNS query." and also
> says "We need to drop/remove the logging here when we have more
> experience."
Is there a sample dig query that can reprodu
...if anyone has specific
thoughts on how to make this sort of thing easier in BIND -- even
just at
the level of "boy, it irritates me that I can't make BIND do " --
such comments will fall on welcoming ears.
I agree that it would be nice if effort were made into making flipping
masters strai
On 5/9/14, 2:06 PM, Timothe Litt wrote:
>> If you have a suggestion for an important or popular OS version I should
>> add to our build farm, please let me know why.
> I have one suggestion: get a Raspberry PI and build/run on it (the
> usual OS is Debian - 'Raspbian', but people run a variety of
On 5/9/2014 6:59 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
Dave Warren wrote:
On 2014-05-08 15:09, Mark Andrews wrote:
But that does not help when you want a MX record at the apex or
some other record at the apex.
I'd argue that it does -- Since the record is now CNAME'd, the MX record is
now under the control o
On 09/05/2014 18:47, Jon Fullmer wrote:
(Sorry, let's try that again WITHOUT "smart quotes":)
Yeaaahhh that did not work out so well:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5"
Your apostrophes ended up being a chinese character, CJK UNIFIED
IDEOGRAPH-6613 according to Python's unicodedata
> If you have a suggestion for an important or popular OS version I should
> add to our build farm, please let me know why.
I have one suggestion: get a Raspberry PI and build/run on it (the
usual OS is Debian - 'Raspbian', but people run a variety of others.)
Why: I don't run bind on RPI, but
(Sorry, let's try that again WITHOUT "smart quotes":)
Rich, you and Barry both touched on my original tactic. I can define
"something.xyz.com" as a master zone with a single entry. The problem, as
you pointed out, is that this doesn't catch "www.something.xyz.com".
Unfortunately, the "www" section
Rich, you and Barry both touched on my original tactic. I can define
³something.xyz.com² as a master zone with a single entry. The problem, as
you pointed out, is that this doesn¹t catch ³www.something.xyz.com².
Unfortunately, the ³www² section will have any number of random hosts, so
putting manua
Thanks for your reply.
Regards
Giovanni Paterno
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org]
Inviato: venerdì 9 maggio 2014 17.46
A: Giovanni Paterno'
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Oggetto: Re: Bind 9.10 64 bit
In message ,
Giovanni Paterno' writes:
> O.S. Windows 200
In message ,
Giovanni Paterno' writes:
> O.S. Windows 2008 R2 64 bit. Up to now I have used Bind 32 bit, now I see t=
> hat a 64 bit version is available.
> Should I move to 64 bit version ? If yes is there any how to doc ?
>
> Giovanni Paterno
Uninstall the 32 bit version preserving data. In
O.S. Windows 2008 R2 64 bit. Up to now I have used Bind 32 bit, now I see that
a 64 bit version is available.
Should I move to 64 bit version ? If yes is there any how to doc ?
Giovanni Paterno
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bin
Thank you all for your quick response I do appreciate it!!
Regards,
Ed
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Edward DeLargy wrote:
> >
> > > I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
> >
> > The READ
Currently, some of the systems that we automatically build and run
various tests on include:
FreeBSD 4.11 i386
FreeBSD 6.3 i386
FreeBSD 8.4 i386
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT i386
Fedora 18 Linux 3.8.1-201.fc18.x86_64 x86_64
Fedora 19 Linux 3.11.6-200.fc19.x86_64 x86_64
HPUX B11.11 HPPA2.0w (HP 9000/800
Edward DeLargy wrote:
> I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
The README says:
We've had successful builds and tests on the following systems:
...
Fedora Core 6
...
Ubuntu 7.04,
Thank you! I figured that but given some of the oddities of six wasn't sure.
Regards,
Ed
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 9, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Edward DeLargy wrote:
>
>> I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
>
> The README says:
>
> Building
>
>
I’ve been building bind on AIX for years with no problems. I’ve had successful
builds of 9.9.5 with both GCC and XLC.
Tedd
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Edward DeLargy
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:40 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.o
Dave Warren wrote:
> On 2014-05-08 15:09, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > But that does not help when you want a MX record at the apex or
> > some other record at the apex.
>
> I'd argue that it does -- Since the record is now CNAME'd, the MX record is
> now under the control of the destination of the CN
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Edward DeLargy wrote:
>
> > I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
>
> The README says:
>
> Building
>
> BIND 9 currently requires a UNIX system with an ANSI C compiler,
> basic POSIX support, and a 64 bit inte
Edward DeLargy wrote:
> I just want to verify that 9.9.5 can be compiled in AIX
The README says:
Building
BIND 9 currently requires a UNIX system with an ANSI C compiler,
basic POSIX support, and a 64 bit integer type.
We've had successful builds and tests on the follo
Mart van de Wege wrote:
>
> > A lot of the refresh failure logging happens at debug level 1 so you can
> > get more details by running `rndc trace 1`.
>
> Is there a way to filter that after setting it?
Not without altering the server's logging configuration. Something like
the following, perhaps
27 matches
Mail list logo