Recursive client query rate-limiting

2023-08-30 Thread Ben Bridges
. Thanks, .Ben Bridges. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users

RE: Bind 9.16.1 crash

2022-12-07 Thread Ben Bridges
When you say “ISC packages”, are you referring to the packages in the ppa:isc/bind repository on launchpad? Ben Bridges From: Ondřej Surý Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 12:26 AM To: Ben Bridges Cc: Emmanuel Fusté ; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash In fact, it’s

RE: Bind 9.16.1 crash

2022-12-07 Thread Ben Bridges
It looks like that issue was occurring in a different part of the netmgr code and was fixed 8 months ago. Thanks, Ben Bridges From: bind-users On Behalf Of Andrew Latham Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 2:35 PM Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash I see https

RE: Bind 9.16.1 crash

2022-12-07 Thread Ben Bridges
: Emmanuel Fusté Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:22 PM To: Ben Bridges ; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1 crash Current ESV : 9.16.35 No, your release is not patched. Add the ISC PPA repo and install the latest ESV. ISC PPA packaged are packaged by the same maintainers. Le

RE: Bind 9.16.1 crash

2022-12-07 Thread Ben Bridges
Ubuntu 20.04.5 is LTS and BIND 9.16 is the current stable ESV release, so they’re both still fully supported (and fully patched). Thanks, Ben Bridges From: bind-users On Behalf Of John Thurston Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 2:32 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Bind 9.16.1

Bind 9.16.1 crash

2022-12-07 Thread Ben Bridges
orum for this posting, please point me in the right direction. Thanks, Ben Bridges [City Utilities] [SpringNet]<http://www.springnet.net> Sales 417.575.7000 | Support 417.874.8000 | springnet.net<http://www.springnet.net> -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/b

Empty .local zone

2019-02-19 Thread Ben Bridges
record which returns either "localhost" (preferably) or the BIND server itself.) Thanks, Ben Bridges [City Utilities] [SpringNet]<http://www.springnet.net> Sales 417.575.7000 | Support 417.874.8000 | springnet.net<http://www.springnet.net>

RE: Configuring different TTLs in multiple RRs for the same domain name, TYPE, and CLASS

2016-03-24 Thread Ben Bridges
; [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ben Bridges Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 10:48 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org<mailto:bind-users@lists.isc.org> Subject: Configuring different TTLs in multiple RRs for the same domain name, TYPE, and CLASS Greetings. Is it possible in BIN

Configuring different TTLs in multiple RRs for the same domain name, TYPE, and CLASS

2016-03-24 Thread Ben Bridges
for all five records to 300 (or more specifically, the TTL of the first one of the RRs in the file). I looked for a BIND directive in the manual to change this behavior but could find no obvious candidate. Thanks, Ben Bridges Springfield, MO ___ P

RE: Reverse delegation - refused on my DNS

2009-08-19 Thread Ben Bridges
It appears that dns1.zmi.at is refusing queries for 48-28.164.69.212.in-addr.arpa: # dig @dns1.zmi.at 48-28.164.69.212.in-addr.arpa NS +norecurs ; DiG 9.5.0-P1 @dns1.zmi.at 48-28.164.69.212.in-addr.arpa NS +norecurs ; (1 server found) ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; -HEADER-

RE: PTR not working...

2009-08-13 Thread Ben Bridges
Try 82.80-28.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa.IN PTR mail.bgrinformatique.com. instead of 82.115.25.70.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR mail.bgrinformatique.com. -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf

RE: Can't transfer RFC2317 reverse zone

2009-07-31 Thread Ben Bridges
With the file statement in the zone declaration for that zone. Zone 0/27.146.68.12.in-addr.arpa { ... file blah-blah; # orfile 0.27.146.68.12.in-addr.arpa; as I believe Mark Andrews suggested ... }; (See also Jeff Lightner's example earlier in this thread.)

RE: Delegation not working

2009-05-07 Thread Ben Bridges
.in-addr.arpa. Try changing your $GENERATE directives to $GENERATE 0-127 $.10.in-addr.arpa. NS dhcp-01.adm.bart.gov. $GENERATE 0-127 $.10.in-addr.arpa. NS mrep-02.adm.bart.gov. and see if that works. Ben Bridges -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun

RE: Delegation not working

2009-05-07 Thread Ben Bridges
I wasn't thinking straight. Ignore that. My apologies. -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Ben Bridges Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 2:42 PM To: Mike Bernhardt Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE

RE: Root Server Simulation Communication Problem

2009-03-26 Thread Ben Bridges
servers what are the changes I will be making in my abc.com server and what configuration should be there for the new caching name server, so that my clients can do a external query. Regards Mani From: Ben Bridges [mailto:bbrid

RE: Root Server Simulation Communication Problem

2009-03-20 Thread Ben Bridges
You have recursion disabled on your abc.com server, and I believe that is preventing your query from succeeding. My understanding is that the contents of the root hints file are not stored in the server's cache (which means, I think, that they are not themselves returned in response to queries

RE: rDNS for /20

2009-03-13 Thread Ben Bridges
You can use one $GENERATE statement in each zone to generate all 256 CNAME records for that zone. Ben -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Lasman Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:31 PM To: Mark Andrews

RE: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-13 Thread Ben Bridges
? - Kevin Ben Bridges wrote: If I dump the delegation and make an MX record in the master, mail will be OK, but then no one can query records in that zone because it's not actually delegated unless they point at MS-DNS. Is there a reason

RE: Peaceful coexistence with Windows domain

2009-03-12 Thread Ben Bridges
If I dump the delegation and make an MX record in the master, mail will be OK, but then no one can query records in that zone because it's not actually delegated unless they point at MS-DNS. Is there a reason why you can't point all of your internal hosts (AD and non-AD) at your AD's for

RE: bind-9.5.1-1.P1 -- identicle zone listing and data file in differentviews, but doesn't work

2009-03-10 Thread Ben Bridges
The first query for 130.168.193.66.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN (with recursion disabled) failed because your server is not authoritative for that record and, since you have recursion disabled, it will not query the authoritative server for it. The second query for 130.168.193.66.in-addr.arpa/PTR/IN

RE: BIND logging in a separate node

2009-03-03 Thread Ben Bridges
Something like the following might work. BIND: ... channel my_syslog { syslog local6; severity info; }; ... syslog.conf: ... local6.* @remote-syslog-server // Forward all messages with local6 facility

RE: how to create a private test. zone?

2009-03-01 Thread Ben Bridges
sun NB: it also forwards to isp dns server. If your sun server is configured to use your isp dns server as a forwarder, then I think it will forward requests for example.test to the isp server even though it delegated example.test to plesk. That would seem to be supported by the fact

RE: BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread Ben Bridges
It also appears that your name server (iceman) is configured to accept IPv4 queries only from itself. #listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; }; -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Pounsett

RE: BIND still will not resolve

2009-02-02 Thread Ben Bridges
] On Behalf Of Ben Bridges Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:29 PM To: S. Jeff Cold Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: RE: BIND still will not resolve It also appears that your name server (iceman) is configured to accept IPv4 queries only from itself. #listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1

RE: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT Illegal

2009-01-30 Thread Ben Bridges
The authoritative name servers for nullmx.domainmanager.com are ns1.domainmanager.com and ns2.domainmanager.com. They are domain parking name servers. They return 64.40.103.249 (or at least something close to that) to the query for any A record. The real address of mta.dewile.net is

RE: wildcarding everything

2009-01-28 Thread Ben Bridges
What specifically are you intending to wildcard? com.? net.? .? If so, then you would be implicitly making your name servers authoritative for domains for which your servers are not supposed to be authoritative. Ben Bridges -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org

RE: BIND 9.6 Flaw - CNAME vs. A Record in MX Records are NOT Illegal

2009-01-27 Thread Ben Bridges
When Section 5.1 of RFC 5321 says If a CNAME record is found, the resulting name is processed as if it were the initial name, it is referring to the situation where a query is sent for the MX record for xyz.com, and instead of an MX record being returned for xyz.com, a CNAME record is returned for

RE: reverse lookup to CNAME

2009-01-26 Thread Ben Bridges
as a CNAME somewhere else in the domain space). Is that not the case? Is there some other part of the DNS specification that forbids it? Ben Bridges -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie