Re: 9.18 horrendous

. Expect to be banned and canceled by the childish little minds that feel they are entitled to control the narrative. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the

Re: Problems building bind 9.18.1 on FreeBSD

xpect it to stay that way. Expect future problems and more toxic traffic until it is all just a Linux SystemD service. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

Re: should I be seeing piles of gnuism extensions in the test suite?

it’s important for safe passing of filenames. What you are saying is that your testsuite is not portable. It may or may not work on some systems and good luck if it does not. If I were to try a z/OS system then your code would certainly break there. I can and will test that. Dennis Clarke

should I be seeing piles of gnuism extensions in the test suite?

zone (16) I:cacheclean:exit status: 0 . . . Is there a requirement for GNU sed and GNU awk etc etc ? Also I will try this on z/OS which is even far more strict and I worry that the entire build process may fail due to such extensions. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux

Re: How do I identify if bind9 is using 4 cores?

-- > Thanks and Regards, > Manish R > You may be able to ask with rndc : # # /usr/local/sbin/rndc -s 127.0.0.1 \ > -k /etc/opt/isc/named/rndc.key \ > -p 953 status 2>&1 | grep 'threads' worker threads: 1 # -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and

Re: where are the testing docs ?

On 5/10/21 01:55, @lbutlr wrote: > On 06 May 2021, at 09:57, Dennis Clarke via bind-users > wrote: >> I do NOT trust a build result where I had to go hacking into all the >> Makefiles just to get it to build. You install without doing testing? > > That's a very s

Re: where are the testing docs ?

On 5/8/21 14:13, Evan Hunt wrote: > On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 11:57:58AM -0400, Dennis Clarke via bind-users wrote: >> I do NOT trust a build result where I had to go hacking into all the >> Makefiles just to get it to build. You install without doing testing? > > I think Ondr

Re: took a while to figure out why all your tests fail

On 5/7/21 16:00, Ondřej Surý wrote: > No, the tests run fine on BSDs, there are no gnuisms. > > Solaris just isn’t on our supported platform list Oh thats right .. you guys dropped it. Still a whack of legacy boxes out there running but I guess not ISC Bind in the very very very near future anyw

how to run tests separately

the bad xargs and find options for now. How can I run those tests as separate items manually ? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-use

Re: took a while to figure out why all your tests fail

On 5/6/21 19:03, Mark Andrews wrote: > First of all the user running the tests needs to be able to write to > bin/tests/system. See the permission denied from tee. > Well I gave up and decided to run the tests with the same userid and gid as the acct that created the build. However I see a wh

Re: took a while to figure out why all your tests fail

On 5/6/21 19:03, Mark Andrews wrote: > First of all the user running the tests needs to be able to write to > bin/tests/system. See the permission denied from tee. > I tried that and a pile of *other* things fail : dude@nix$ ifconfig -a lo0:6: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 index 1 inet 12

took a while to figure out why all your tests fail

used the error: /opt/bw/bin/bash ./run.sh -p 5000 dnssec 2>&1 | tee test.output.dnssec make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `test-dnssec' Current working directory /opt/bw/build/bind-9.11.31_sunos5.10_sparcv9.005/bin/tests/system *** Error code 1 The following command caused t

Re: where are the testing docs ?

On 5/6/21 11:24, Ondřej Surý wrote: > FTR the test suite is meant to be used by developers. There’s little value to > use it for validating the production systems. > > Generally speaking, having the dependencies and test interfaces (`sudo > bin/tests/system/ifconfig.sh up`) and running `make che

Re: where are the testing docs ?

On 5/6/21 10:50, Tony Finch wrote: > Dennis Clarke via bind-users wrote: >> >> Hey there. I looked in the README and I dont see an INSTALL file at all >> so I have to assume that the testing docs exist somewhere. > > Have a look at > > https://gitlab.isc.org/i

where are the testing docs ?

interfaces needed and I can not do that on any large production hardware easily. So anyways ... where are the testing docs ? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional ___ Please visit https

Re: Slightly baffled about Undefined symbols that are in OpenSSL

ompile completes. I will dig a bit and see where things went wrong after 9.11.26. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsub

Slightly baffled about Undefined symbols that are in OpenSSL

f -xcheck=noreturn -xthreadvar=dynamic -xregs=no%appl -unroll=1 -xvector=no -mt -oo isc-hmac-fixup-symtbl.o -ir /var/tmp/dclarke/acomp.1620217682.10303.01.ir /usr/ccs/bin/mcs -c isc-hmac-fixup-symtbl.o alpha $ OKee and that looks like it worked. I did go back and rebuild 9.11.26 with no issue. H

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

> And for what it's worth, not all systems moved away from "named" to > "bind9". I've been running FreeBSD for decades, and I can't remember > ever calling the service "bind9". No one ever calls named anything other than named. In a san

Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

> So as an experienced person who has been doing this you-nuxs thing since > 1982 - I DON'T see it different - and in fact, I see it as a RETURN to > what it originally was! Exactly ! Hear hear ! Well said. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken

Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service renamed from bind9 to named?

s but we all need to move forwards. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mai

Re: 9.15.8: task.h includes uninstalled netmgr.h

road over someone doing Python scripts in the code base it funny but easily worked around. Otherwise ISC Bind "just works"(tm) and so I am curious what version you have there ? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken

--without-python does not work for 9.11.13

elsewhere? Who let this happen? To pure beautiful cross platform clean C code someone allowed python in the door? Has anyone tested this "--without-python" option ? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional

Re: what is this python stuff in 9.11.7 ??

On 5/30/19 6:05 PM, Anand Buddhdev wrote: On 30/05/2019 23:45, Dennis Clarke wrote: Hi Dennis, Some of the utilities in newer version of BIND, such as dnssec-keymgr, are written in python. This utility is very useful if you're going to sign zones using BIND. If you don't want or nee

what is this python stuff in 9.11.7 ??

che__/__init__.cpython-37.pyc ./lib/python3.7/site-packages/isc/__pycache__/keymgr.cpython-37.pyc Is any of this stuff needed? Is this somehow operational stuff for a production named daemon ? Is this documented anywhere? -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBear

Re: A little baffled by bind 9.14.2 wanting some special python?

/isc-projects/bind9/merge_requests/1964 Apologies about the confusion. Thanks but won't matter much anyways. Time to shutdown all the Solaris systems and move to FreeBSD or similar. Sadly there is nothing that can run on these Fujitsu sparc boxes I have. Nothing that I know of. -- Dennis C

bug in ifiter_getifaddrs.c cannot find include file: ??

aving directory '/usr/local/build/bind-9.14.2_SunOS5.10_sparc64vii+.002/lib/isc/unix' gmake[2]: *** [Makefile:203: subdirs] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/build/bind-9.14.2_SunOS5.10_sparc64vii+.002/lib/isc' gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:84:

A little baffled by bind 9.14.2 wanting some special python?

27;/opt/python/lib/python37.zip', '/opt/python/lib/python3.7', '/opt/python/lib/python3.7/lib-dynload', '/opt/python/lib/python3.7/site-packages'] >>> beta$ So configure is only looking at the old /bin/python2.7 stuff ? Anyway around this? -- De

Re: isc-bind-esv Repository - "yum update" doing undesirable things!

re old rules for ensuring separation from the vendor OS. With systemctl and other new paradigms then all manner of oddball stuff may happen. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional ___ Please

Re: BIND 9.11.6-P1 build fails on Solaris

y and has no future really. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-

Re: odd failures from 9.12.3

On 10/18/2018 11:38 PM, Evan Hunt wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:21:49PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: oh .. also .. I'll look into these and see if I can clean them up : "zone.c", line 4275: warning: syntax error: empty declaration "client.c", line 2983

Re: odd failures from 9.12.2-P2

On 10/18/2018 11:38 PM, Evan Hunt wrote: On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:21:49PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: I:System test result summary: I: 7 FAIL I: 69 PASS I: 4 SKIPPED I: 12 UNTESTED I:The following system tests failed: I: autosign I: catz I: dnssec I: filter- I

okay ... odd failures in 9.12.3

I see these results : I:System test result summary: I: 2 FAIL I: 74 PASS I: 4 SKIPPED I: 12 UNTESTED I:The following system tests failed: I: dnssec I: nsupdate This is on Solaris 10 sparc and using the Oracle Studio 12.6 tools as well as OpenSSL 1.1.1 which passes all tests.

odd failures from 9.12.2-P2

I see these results : I:System test result summary: I: 7 FAIL I: 69 PASS I: 4 SKIPPED I: 12 UNTESTED I:The following system tests failed: I: autosign I: catz I: dnssec I: filter- I: legacy I: mkeys I: staticstub This is on Solaris 10 sparc and usin

Re: bind-9.12.2-P2 fails to compile with baffling undefined symbol issues

; atomic_store (&i, 0); return 0; } No issues at all with -xatomic=studio -std=c11 however this is impossible with c99. So what is the minimum spec for ISC Bind? If the ISO/IEC 9899:2011 standard is minimum then perhaps there could be a notation somewhere on the isc site for that. De

Re: bind-9.12.2-P2 fails to compile with baffling undefined symbol issues

On 10/18/2018 04:04 AM, Michał Kępień wrote: This looks like an Oracle Developer Studio glitch related to C11 atomic operations. To fix it, try fiddling around with the -xatomic compiler option [1] and/or the -std compiler option and/or the CC environment variable. To work around the problem, b

bind-9.12.2-P2 fails to compile with baffling undefined symbol issues

This has me baffled : /opt/developerstudio12.6/bin/c99 -mt -errfmt=error -erroff=%none -errshort=full -xstrconst -xildoff -m64 -xmemalign=8s -xnolibmil -Xc -xcode=pic32 -xregs=no%appl -xlibmieee -mc -ftrap=%none -xbuiltin=%none -xdebugformat=dwarf -xunroll=1 -xarch=sparc -I/usr/include/libx

Re: Question about visibility

On 10/11/2018 03:21 PM, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote: Em 11/10/18 16:13, Barry Margolin escreveu: If you accidentally, or someone else intentionally, create a link to the site that uses the IP and put it on a web page that Google can get to, it will probably find the page.     robots.txt, on y

Re: named tcp dos?

On 08/02/2018 04:16 PM, Randy Bush wrote: it is in a contest with ipv6 for non-deployment I read this mail list ALL the time and finally something appears that quite literally made me call over a few guys to point at my screen. Well done. Let's make up a tee-shirt with that on it : DNSSEC

Re: Should we bundle the MaxMind GeoIP db?

I think that would be more useful (and less likely to complicate the lives of packagers) than bundling the database. And less work for you :-) right on. Also, my fear is that "what else?" will happen and then we have codebase tossed in for a https/tls_1.3 admin front end being bolted in.

Re: Should we bundle the MaxMind GeoIP db?

-projects and costs and staff. Is this really necessary for what Berkeley Internet Name Daemon should be doing? Dennis Clarke ye old UNIX silverback [1] also "Write programs to work together." ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listin

Re: My domain name name not propagating through the Internet.

On 05/26/2018 12:44 PM, Thomas Strike wrote: I have been fighting a problem of setting up a new Bind9.9 primary... If I dig for your name server via google I get told not much : $ dig ns1.sleepyvalley.net @8.8.8.8 ; <<>> DiG 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-51.el7_4.2 <<>> ns1.sleepyvalley.net @8.8.8.8 ;

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/ Ah yes, there they are!  Thanks. I will blame the hour and the lack of caffeine for missing that one. :) As is often the case I find the solution to something immediately *after* I post to a maillist and stare at my coffee cup ... it happens .. all the tim

Re: BIND source distribution missing?

On 04/05/18 08:04 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote: Hi ISC! I'm writing to let you know there seems to be a bug on the ISC web site.  Coming from MacOS Chrome, I'm only being offered the binary Windows distribution of BIND for download from and from

Re: strange problem with query being dropped/ignored by the BIND process

On 06/29/2017 12:52 PM, Marc Richter wrote: Hi again, I have checked this again today. Send & receive buffers are both 1MB, the Server has 8 CPUs and during startup BIND is reporting this: found 8 CPUs, using 8 worker threads using 7 UDP listeners per interface using up

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On 01/26/2017 06:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: librarie sgot overwritten by the package manager Impossible. If the user built or the vendor supplied software follows the rules of separation along with the RPATH and RUNPATH data inside the ELF dynamic sections then what you say is impossi

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

On 01/26/2017 06:39 PM, Alan Clegg wrote: On 1/26/17 1:31 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: The POSIX and XPG4 approach [is a great idea] (My text in brackets) Said no one, ever. Clearly I just said it ... and have before ... as have others for about twenty years or at least since 1999

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

ist for very good reasons and if a user makes the choice to dance in a minefield then by all means let them. However a caution sign should be posted on the outer edge with some fine print which says "you have the freedom to do so but here are so

Re: bind-9.11.0-P2 on Debian 9.0 (stretch)

OpenSSL 1.1 is currently not supported because they made > backwards-incompatible API changes ... Is this issue documented somewhere ? Dennis Clarke ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from t

Re: "Jumbo" Security Release of BIND corrects four exploitable vulnerabilities.

wait for someone else to compile it in for you ( Red Hat or whomever ) or just do it yourself and then you know it is done and you even know it was done correctly and as a real bonus you know who did it. Dennis Clarke d...@genunix.com ___ Please visit

bind-9.11.0-P1 "db.c", line 771: error: syntax error before or at: )

During a compile in the same way as I have always done I was surprised to see : . . . /opt/developerstudio12.5/bin/cc -mt -I/usr/local/build/bind-9.11.0-P1_SunOS5.10_sparcv9.001 -I../../../.. -I/usr/local/build/bind-9.11.0-P1_SunOS5.10_sparcv9.001/lib/dns/include -I../../../../lib/dns/inclu

Re: dnssec-validation [ ddig_sigchase option ]

On 10/12/16 15:07, Evan Hunt wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 10/12/16 13:36, Evan Hunt wrote: I recommend using "delv" instead. "dig +sigchase" isn't good code. ? well that is news to me :-\ It's code that was cont

Re: dnssec-validation [ ddig_sigchase option ]

On 10/12/16 13:36, Evan Hunt wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:40:54PM +, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote: Was trying to run dig commands to do some dnssec validation and got the following message " "Invalid option: +sigchase" I recommend using "delv" instead. "dig +sigchase" isn't goo

Re: dnssec-validation [ ddig_sigchase option ]

On 10/12/16 11:40, Bhangui, Sandeep - BLS CTR wrote: Hi Running ISC Bind 9.10.4-P2 will be soon moving to 9.10.4-P3. Was trying to run dig commands to do some dnssec validation and got the following message " "Invalid option: +sigchase" When checked found that the dig utility has to be compi

Re: how to log client MAC address?

On 08/06/2016 10:01 PM, Frank Pikelner wrote: MAC addresses are layer 2 and you only see those on your subnet, i.e. most likely your default gateway, etc. So the answer is no. Unless he only cares about internal clients on a local subnet. dc ___ Pl

Re: ISC considering a change to the BIND open source license

also. This is an excellent transition for all involved and ensures a higher level of quality control on DNS products. Dennis Clarke ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list

Re: sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout

> http://comp.protocols.dns.bind.narkive.com/fijjEh47/workaround-solaris-s-kernel-bug > The issue was the define ISC_SOCKET_USE_POLLWATCH. If that is defined then we see the problem of strange " sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout" filling up the logs. Probably needed on Solaris 8 or

Re: sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout

> >I have a recent build of BIND 9.9.3-P1 and after bringing up the service > >on a > >Solaris 10 server I begin to see many log entries like so : > > > >28-Jun-2013 15:41:17.636 sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout > > > >I don't know what this is and am mildly concerned. Is this evidence

sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout

I have a recent build of BIND 9.9.3-P1 and after bringing up the service on a Solaris 10 server I begin to see many log entries like so : 28-Jun-2013 15:41:17.636 sockmgr 1005a1080: unexpected POLL timeout I don't know what this is and am mildly concerned. Is this evidence of a config problem

Re: named in BIND 9.9.3-P1 needs libpkcs11.so ?

> You don't need --with-pkcs11 unless you're planning to use a > cryptographic accelerator > or hardware service module, and you'd have had to build a special > version of OpenSSL > for that. Remove it from the configure options and you should be fine. Did a quick rebuild and yes Sir, runs lik

named in BIND 9.9.3-P1 needs libpkcs11.so ?

# /opt/adbs/sbin/named -u named -c /etc/opt/adbs/named/named.conf -4 -d 2 -f -g -n 1 27-Jun-2013 03:43:27.243 starting BIND 9.9.3-P1 -u named -c /etc/opt/adbs/named/named.conf -4 -d 2 -f -g -n 1 27-Jun-2013 03:43:27.246 built with '--build=sparc-sun-solaris2.10' '--host=sparc-sun-solaris2.10' '

Re: Build BIND 9.9.3-P1 on Solaris 10 with 'cc', using OpenSSL built with 'gcc'?

> That seems oddthough I haven't tried building 9.9.3-P1 yet. > > But, all the previous releases built with gcc. Our Solaris package > build/management system only has gcc. > > BIND 9.9.3 was the first BIND that got built 64-bit, which did take a > little extra work in getting it find our

Re: Possible DDoS?

> From time to time I notice a large number of queries like these to one > of my external dns servers: > > 14:14:40.01407 121.10.105.66 -> 143.231.1.67 DNS C gop.gov. Internet * > ? > > Does this rise to the level of a DDoS attack? > No NS record for this IP. > I blackhole IPs that behave lik

Re: VMware & Bind

I think you mean : will bind run within VMware ? The answer from me is total yes. I have multiple systems in vSphere and running fine with bind 9.8.x Dennis - Original Message - From: "Manson, John" Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:28 pm Subject: VMware & Bind To: "'bind-users@lists.isc.

Re: Bind9.9.1 Dependences

it is. libz.so.1 and libiconv.so.2 are pretty obvious. I thinks that is all that one would want or need. Dennis -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solari

RE: Bind9.9.1 Dependences

---Original Message- > From: Dennis Clarke [mailto:dcla...@blastwave.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 12:14 PM > To: Manson, John > Cc: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' > Subject: Re: Bind9.9.1 Dependences > > >> How can I find out which Unix files/libraries bind requi

Re: Bind9.9.1 Dependences

? Dennis -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+-------+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for o

Re: ISC BIND 9.8.2 followup announcement

d/or SVR4 UNIX. dc -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solari

Re: BIND 9.8.2 is now available

-- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-----+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla..

Re: BIND 9.8.2 is now available

package prototype kept complaining that I had 9.8.1 Release notes. Yup. -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | |

Re: Can't compile bind 9.8.1-P1 on Solaris

m trying ... really. -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+-------+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla...@blastwave.org | Res

Re: Can't compile bind 9.8.1-P1 on Solaris

great on Solaris and I expect to have all my Solaris name servers updated before morning. The Debian folks have already release update patches. Life is good. Dennis -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/

Re: Can't compile bind 9.8.1-P1 on Solaris

- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open

Re: Can't compile bind 9.8.1-P1 on Solaris

> Is anyone else having problems with the compile? > Give me 60 minutes -- -- http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +-+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Sourc

Re: Can't compile bind 9.8.1-P1 on Solaris

t.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B +---------+---+ | Dennis Clarke | Solaris and Linux and Open Source | | dcla...@blastwave.org | Respect for open standards. | +-+---+ ___

9.8.0-P1 platform.h questions

multitude of such differences? -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

current downloads ?

Why does "current downloads" on the isc.org homepage report 9.7.3 for bind and ignore 9.8.x entirely. -- Dennis ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: ISC BIND 9.8.0 is now available

BAE00 gpg: Good signature from "Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. (Signing key, 2009) " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: FA76 7A86 A371 E359 22F6 A5C8 D8

Re: Security Advisory: Server Lockup Upon IXFR or DDNS Update Combined with High Query Rate

do not know the answer to your question about the NIST CVE listings, > but I will inquire. Our CVE numbers actually come to us from > Carnegie-Mellon CERT, not NIST, but NIST does keep an up to date list > generally. > > I'll also post here if/when I find out more. thank you and

Re: Security Advisory: Server Lockup Upon IXFR or DDNS Update Combined with High Query Rate

ks at nist are doing an update ? -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris -- > Internet Systems Consortium Security > A

Re: BIND 9.7.3 is now available.

Debian squeeze and see what happens. Personally I'm not sure if there is a comprehensive test suite in the iscbind packages. Is there ? How would one verify the functionality of the new security features? -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open s

Re: bind 9.7.2-P3 does not resolve www.microsoft.com

> works fine for me on linux and Solaris. -- Dennis Clarke dcla...@opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris dcla...@blastwave.org <- Email related to open source for Solaris ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Bind named 9.7.2-P2 segfault and core dump when in debug mode

I am trying to track down a bit of strange behavior. Not sure if anyone else sees this. I tend to run named in the foreground and in debug level 2 for a while after I compile it. If all looks good then I can run it as a service daemon in the usual way. This means I run it like so : bash-3.00# /

BIND 9.7.1-P2 for Solaris 8, 9 and 10 released

til to fetch software packages. see : http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-help/2010-July/019259.html http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-help/2010-July/019260.html Thanks -- Dennis Clarke dclarke at opensolaris.ca <- Email related to the open source Solaris d

Re: Bind 9.4.3-P3 on Solaris 10 Hang

> hi. > > I'm satoshi. > > I use BIND 9.4.3. > > Same situation was generated in my DNS server. > > Did you solve this problem? > > I would like you to teach when doing because it solved it. > > Regards > Just upgrade to 9.7.1-P1 on Solaris. There are free packages ready to run at Blastwave.org