Re: Windows support has been discontinued in BIND 9.17+ (Was: Important: A significant flaw is present in June BIND releases 9.16.17 and 9.17.14)

Windows install read regisyty key (if exist) if u have an old install it will be installed on previous path if not and u'r aware u can edit registry and install it where u like yes today I seen path but tought to whay I just wrote here and jumped any reply. In all case, find ur named-checkconf

Fw: Origin of reverse lookup

good to know From: bind-users on behalf of Reindl Harald Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 5:01 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Origin of reverse lookup FIRST: this will be my last response to you and if it's only

Re: Origin of reverse lookup

of reverse lookup Am 19.06.21 um 13:24 schrieb alcol alcol: > I see you have time to waste saying strange things seriously? > dns zones even forard or reverse are downloaded as configured from > masters to slaves or where are needed may you show me word "slave" in any line

Re: Origin of reverse lookup

as mine From: bind-users on behalf of Reindl Harald Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2021 12:36 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Origin of reverse lookup Am 19.06.21 um 12:10 schrieb alcol alcol: > ISP Have is a normale DNS zone as forward o

Re: Origin of reverse lookup

ISP Have is a normale DNS zone as forward ones they does not offer remote mainteining as you should own all subnet class and are directly downloaded from iana if I remember well. if something go wrong with the zone ISP will have issue from tld. in past I had a master reverse lookup maintained

Re: No more support for windows

REALLY, it is From: bind-users on behalf of Ondřej Surý Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 11:39 PM To: Eric Germann Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: No more support for windows What I’ve heard is that the geoip/maxmindb is the deal breaker, but on

Re: bind vulnerabilities

from isc https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00913 [https://cdn.document360.io/956e37e2-5ec0-4942-8b27-35533899f099/Images/Documentation/ISC-logo-rgb-2048x1149.png] BIND 9 Security Vulnerability Matrix - Security Advisories kb.isc.org

Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure

seriously? is like linux/unix FAQ  From: bind-users on behalf of Paul Cizmas Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 9:06 PM To: Tony Finch Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: BIND 9.16.13 and Mac OS X 10.13.6 - problems with ./configure Tony, thank you! I

Re: Servfail on Bind -9.16.1

are not FQDN ... maybe www.facebook.com not only facebook.com only facebook.com could be referenced with an A record but maybe not www.facebook.com is a right query From: bind-users on behalf of upen Sent:

Re: How can I launch a private Internet DNS server?

you can't run a sec. srv. from your own. You need some action from ADMIN-C or TECH-C otherwise it will not work at all x RFC SOA refresh 24H In all case a sec. srv. on the same net From: bind-users on behalf of Kevin A. McGrail Sent: Saturday, November 7,

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Domain Control Validation

TXT and other records can be duplicated. I think you are CA, you know your answer. Ask your CA technical support (who provided you with the RSA certificate). From: bind-users on behalf of Khuu, Linh Contractor via bind-users Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020

Re: How can I launch a private Internet DNS server?

can't be done a tutorial for your specific case follow the section for primary DNS and discard secondary section aren't needed two IP one for web and one for DNS , if you want all can be done with 1 IP be sure you have 80 443 53tcp 53udp open from internet to your server.

Re: How can I launch a private Internet DNS server?

A DNS server can exist if you follow NIC instractions. Mainly have you a leased line ever on? primary DNS can't be down or NIC could down your domain. Then you have to install and configure it. Better a fedora core , and CHROOT, DNS is one of the services more targeted to enter inside a system.

Re: It is too hard for me to read from this mailing list

uninteresting From: bind-users on behalf of Michael De Roover Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 5:08 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: It is too hard for me to read from this mailing list On Mon, 2020-09-21 at 16:15 -0400, Allen Chen wrote: > I

Re: Unable to completely transfer root zone

Hi usually it is a common problem. If u'r succesful via u'r root access, it mean is not a network or BIND related but FULL PATH and File Permission issue. Daemons does not run with root privilege for priviledge escalation and specially bind and others are jailed. Check if all paths are not