Am 19.04.2017 um 06:52 schrieb i.chu...@volga.ttk.ru:
Hello all.
Regarding the "critical mass": I'm the one who downloads BIND from XP box
and I do it just to set it up on internal Linux machine. The reason to use
XP as PC OS is company's policy and lack of money after all. :)
P. S.: I can
t's technically
possible to build them."
--
With best regards, Igor Chudov.
Tel.: +7 937 266-51-34
От:
"Darcy Kevin (FCA)" <kevin.da...@fcagroup.com>
Кому:
"bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org>,
Дата:
19.04.2017 02:59
Тема:
RE: BIND 9 windows
In message <20170418194105.06929a69@ime1.iment.local>, Paul Kosinski writes:
> I would think that a Internet-connected box that is severely
> compromised (e.g., has malware running with maximal privileges) is
> about as bad as having the LAN that the box is on connected to the
> Internet directly
inder to
> upgrade/replace/refresh their XP boxes?
>
>
> -
> Kevin
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
> Of Paul Kosinski Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2
windows XP builds
To be sure, all things must come to end, and XP support for BIND is no
exception. But, the risk calculation runs something like: is there still enough
critical mass of BIND-on-XP out there that there is a *bigger* risk incurred by
no longer incorporating new security updates
, April 18, 2017 5:09 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
Yes, I suppose not every machine running BIND is connected to the Internet. But
how many are network inaccessible to every machine that
*is* connected to the Internet and might be compromised?
We run
- Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf
> Of Paul Kosinski Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:08 PM
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
>
> I can see som
ing similar and tiny
available for windows native too
-Original Message-
From: bind-users [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Paul
Kosinski
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:08 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
I can see somebody running
Subject: Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
I can see somebody running XP for some "legacy" software that doesn't run
nicely on newer versions of Windows, but I would think it extremely risky to
have such a machine connected to the Internet.
Maybe whoever runs BIND on XP should consider co
M
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [E] Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
Hi there,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:
... I wanted to find out whether there's a reason for so many people
to still be doing this -- even if it wasn't a very good reason --
before I cut them off.
Personally I'm
-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of G.W.
Haywood
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:28 AM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: [E] Re: BIND 9 windows XP builds
Hi there,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:
> ... I wanted to find out whether there's a reason for so many people
> to
Hi there,
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017, Evan Hunt wrote:
... I wanted to find out whether there's a reason for so many people
to still be doing this -- even if it wasn't a very good reason --
before I cut them off.
Personally I'm more than a bit surprised, and even a little offended
that ISC still
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 09:08:28PM -0400, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> I can see somebody running XP for some "legacy" software that doesn't
> run nicely on newer versions of Windows, but I would think it extremely
> risky to have such a machine connected to the Internet.
Yes, it seems like an
I can see somebody running XP for some "legacy" software that doesn't
run nicely on newer versions of Windows, but I would think it extremely
risky to have such a machine connected to the Internet.
Maybe whoever runs BIND on XP should consider converting that machine to
Linux, and running BIND on
Greetings,
For some time ISC has been providing three Windows builds for each release
of BIND 9: x64, win32, and windows XP.
Windows XP is well past its end of life and is no longer receiving security
updates. I'd like to stop supporting it after the upcoming maintenance
release, but it's been
15 matches
Mail list logo