Re: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
1 QuadCore Intel i7 920 on Fedora 11 x86_64 (can't remember the exact kernel version) with and without hyperthreading and overclocked ranging between 2.8 and 3.4GHz On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 29.09.10 10:43, Jonathan Petersson wrote: >> I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph >> representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png > > on how many processors was this ran? > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar] > ___ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
On 29.09.10 10:43, Jonathan Petersson wrote: > I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph > representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png on how many processors was this ran? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "To Boot or not to Boot, that's the question." [WD1270 Caviar] ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
2010/9/29 Eivind Olsen > Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which > could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading? > I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything > yet. > > To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server > hardware would be for a recursive DNS server. On one hand, the Sun (ok, > Oracle) Niagara/Coolthreads architecture seems to work nicely enough, but > maybe I'd be better off with some generic Intel/AMD based solution with > fewer threads/cores but higher GHz per thread? > i did some test and Niagara (T1000 / T5240) performs badly (response time and rate) compared to Intel/AMD some numbers at 75% cpu T1000 6 cores / 24threads~10ms 600 queries/second 2-core AMD 1210 1.8ghz:~0.6ms 7000 queries/second 8-core Intel E5410 2.33ghz: ~0.6ms 7 queries/second -- Fabien ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, wrote: > Hi > > i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load > balancing > between 2 processe was better. Is this always the case ? > http://zaphods.net/~zaphodb/high-performance-bind9.html > > some interesting links for DNS performance : > http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Building_Scalable_DNS_Cluster_using_LVS > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2006-September/063917.html > > Philippe > > > >> -Original Message- >> From: bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom@lists.isc.org >> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom@lists.isc.org] >> On Behalf Of Eivind Olsen >> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 09:56 >> To: bind-us...@isc.org >> Subject: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading? >> >> Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which >> could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading? >> I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything >> yet. >> >> To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server >> hardware would be for a recursive DNS server. On one hand, the Sun (ok, >> Oracle) Niagara/Coolthreads architecture seems to work nicely enough, but >> maybe I'd be better off with some generic Intel/AMD based solution with >> fewer threads/cores but higher GHz per thread? >> >> Regards >> Eivind Olsen >> >> >> ___ >> bind-users mailing list >> bind-users@lists.isc.org >> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > ___ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users > ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
RE: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
Hi i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load balancing between 2 processe was better. Is this always the case ? http://zaphods.net/~zaphodb/high-performance-bind9.html some interesting links for DNS performance : http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Building_Scalable_DNS_Cluster_using_LVS https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2006-September/063917.html Philippe > -Original Message- > From: bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom@lists.isc.org] > On Behalf Of Eivind Olsen > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 09:56 > To: bind-us...@isc.org > Subject: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading? > > Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which > could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading? > I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything > yet. > > To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server > hardware would be for a recursive DNS server. On one hand, the Sun (ok, > Oracle) Niagara/Coolthreads architecture seems to work nicely enough, but > maybe I'd be better off with some generic Intel/AMD based solution with > fewer threads/cores but higher GHz per thread? > > Regards > Eivind Olsen > > > ___ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading? I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything yet. To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server hardware would be for a recursive DNS server. On one hand, the Sun (ok, Oracle) Niagara/Coolthreads architecture seems to work nicely enough, but maybe I'd be better off with some generic Intel/AMD based solution with fewer threads/cores but higher GHz per thread? Regards Eivind Olsen ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
