On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 07:39 -0800, Pamela Rock wrote:
> > > [r...@test /]# dig ip6.test.com @bind6 +tcp
> > +short socket.c:4922: 22/Invalid argument dig:
> > isc_socket_connect:
> > > unexpected error
> [...]
> This is a totally closed network. There is no access to anything.
I apologise be
> I suspect your error has more to do with the value of the
> IPv6
> address and sanity checks in the Linux kernel than with
> anything
> else. Use a allocated address or generate a ULA
> prefix for testing
> and use that.
>
Mark - you are right on the money!! I changed my IPv6 address, now eve
--- On Tue, 12/29/09, Alan Clegg wrote:
> From: Alan Clegg
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Date: Tuesday, December 29, 2009, 9:34 AM
> Pamela Rock wrote:
>
> > [r...@test /]# dig ip6.test.com @bind6 +tcp
> +short s
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> From: Kevin Oberman
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: "Mark Andrews" , "Chuck Anderson" ,
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 10:08 PM
> > Date: Mo
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:02:29 -0800 (PST)
> From: Pamela Rock
>
>
>
> --- On Mon, 12/28/09, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> > From: Mark Andrews
> > Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> > To: "Pamela Rock"
> > Cc: "Kevin Oberman" , "Chuc
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Mark Andrews wrote:
> From: Mark Andrews
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: "Kevin Oberman" , "Chuck Anderson" ,
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 8:22 PM
>
> In
In message <475084.65186...@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, Pamela Rock writes:
> This query is to anyone in general, based on the previous dig statement, do=
> es the following command make sense??
>
> dig -6 www.es.net @some:ipv6:address +tcp
>
> I'm wondering if the combination of -6, @some:ip
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> From: Kevin Oberman
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org, "Chuck Anderson"
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 6:07 PM
> > Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:50
> -0800 (
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:50 -0800 (PST)
> From: Pamela Rock
> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>
> --- On Mon, 12/28/09, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> > From: Chuck Anderson
> > Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> > To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> From: Chuck Anderson
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 3:58 PM
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:56:56AM
> -0800, Pamela Rock wrote:
> > I posted this query a while a
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:56:56AM -0800, Pamela Rock wrote:
> I posted this query a while ago but have not yet been able to resolve the
> issue...
>
> I have a DNS server and client that can ping each other using ping6. The
> following query works:
>
> dig -6 test.com +notcp
>
> When I quer
IPTables and IP6Tables are turned off and not running. There is no other
firewalls or filtering routers between DNS clients and servers.
--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Rick Dicaire wrote:
> From: Rick Dicaire
> Subject: Re: IPv6 TCP
> To: "Pamela Rock"
> Cc: bind-users@lists.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Pamela Rock wrote:
> When I query TCP with IPv6 I get the following error:
Check client machine firewall.
--
aRDy Music and Rick Dicaire present:
http://www.ardynet.com
http://www.ardynet.com:9000/ardymusic.ogg.m3u
__
I posted this query a while ago but have not yet been able to resolve the
issue...
I have a DNS server and client that can ping each other using ping6. The
following query works:
dig -6 test.com +notcp
When I query TCP with IPv6 I get the following error:
r...@test:/home/janderson/bind-9.6.
14 matches
Mail list logo
