...@nic.fr]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 10:25 AM
To: P.A
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:19:33AM -0400,
P.A wrote
a message of 314 lines which said:
> I think I see what the issue is,
No. Completely unrelated.
>
At Mon, 10 May 2010 10:05:47 -0400,
"P.A" wrote:
> Today I came in and both my name server stopped answering queries. I
> restarted the servers a couple of times and they are now up. I have posted
> the primary/slave look below. My question is did I just get rid by the
>
...@nic.fr]
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 10:24 AM
> To: P.A
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Subject: Re: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:05:47AM -0400,
> P.A wrote
> a message of 242 lines which said:
>
>
>> My question is did I jus
sers@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:05:47AM -0400,
P.A wrote
a message of 242 lines which said:
My question is did I just get rid by the kaminsky vulnerability?
Not at all. The Kaminsky attack poisons the server, it does not crash
ginal Message-
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:bortzme...@nic.fr]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 10:24 AM
To: P.A
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:05:47AM -0400,
P.A wrote
a message of 242 lines which said:
> My question is di
On 5/10/2010 10:19 AM, P.A wrote:
> Primary server: BIND 9.4.3b2
Continue your upgrade process to a version of BIND that is supported. :)
http://www.isc.org/software/bind/versions
AlanC
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
bind-
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:05:47AM -0400,
P.A wrote
a message of 242 lines which said:
> My question is did I just get rid by the kaminsky vulnerability?
Not at all. The Kaminsky attack poisons the server, it does not crash
it.
> Primary server: BIND 9.4.3b2
Why do you run a beta v
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:19:33AM -0400,
P.A wrote
a message of 314 lines which said:
> I think I see what the issue is,
No. Completely unrelated.
> http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/725188
In that case, the error was:
Jul 29 09:10:57 lilith named[2428]: db.c:619: \
REQUIRE(type
, May 10, 2010 10:06 AM
To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org'
Subject: KAMINSKY vulnerability !!
Hi, list.
Today I came in and both my name server stopped answering queries. I
restarted the servers a couple of times and they are now up. I have posted
the primary/slave look below. My qu
Hi, list.
Today I came in and both my name server stopped answering queries. I
restarted the servers a couple of times and they are now up. I have posted
the primary/slave look below. My question is did I just get rid by the
kaminsky vulnerability? if so how can I determined what host caused
10 matches
Mail list logo
