Re: Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-07-01 Thread Kalman Feher
I was obviously especially tired yesterday when I tested this. Anyway BIND was chroot'd and user wasn't. (slaps forehead) Problem solved. On 30/06/10 6:07 PM, Kal Feher kalman.fe...@melbourneit.com.au wrote: On 30/06/10 5:25 PM, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote: On 6/30/2010 11:13

Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-06-30 Thread Kalman Feher
While testing bind 9.7.1 features including automated signing and update-policy local. I encountered some strange behaviour using nsupdate -l. When using nsupdate -l I was not able to update the zone in question and the following error was generated: update-security: error: client 127.0.0.1#9292:

Re: Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-06-30 Thread Alan Clegg
On 6/30/2010 11:13 AM, Kalman Feher wrote: While testing bind 9.7.1 features including automated signing and update-policy local. I encountered some strange behaviour using nsupdate -l. When using nsupdate -l I was not able to update the zone in question and the following error was

Re: Nsupdate -l not using session.key

2010-06-30 Thread Kalman Feher
On 30/06/10 5:25 PM, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote: On 6/30/2010 11:13 AM, Kalman Feher wrote: While testing bind 9.7.1 features including automated signing and update-policy local. I encountered some strange behaviour using nsupdate -l. When using nsupdate -l I was not able to update