RE: number of zones not matching

2009-03-20 Thread Todd Snyder
I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simplest way I've found. It's not elegant or nifty, but it works. on the master: grep zone named.conf | awk '{print $2} | sort master.zones on the slave: grep zone named.conf | awk '{print $2} | sort slave.zones get the files on the

Re: number of zones not matching

2009-03-20 Thread John D. Vo
Yes, Todd. 9.2.2. Todd Snyder wrote: I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simplest way I've found. It's not elegant or nifty, but it works. on the master: grep zone named.conf | awk '{print $2} | sort master.zones on the slave: grep zone named.conf | awk '{print $2} |

RE: number of zones not matching

2009-03-20 Thread Todd Snyder
. -Original Message- From: John D. Vo [mailto:j...@eagle.net] Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 3:27 PM To: Todd Snyder Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: number of zones not matching Yes, Todd. 9.2.2. Todd Snyder wrote: I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simplest way I've

Re: number of zones not matching

2009-03-20 Thread John D. Vo
: Re: number of zones not matching Yes, Todd. 9.2.2. Todd Snyder wrote: I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simplest way I've found. It's not elegant or nifty, but it works. on the master: grep zone named.conf | awk '{print $2} | sort master.zones on the slave: grep

Re: number of zones not matching

2009-03-20 Thread Mark Andrews
: number of zones not matching Yes, Todd. 9.2.2. Todd Snyder wrote: /pre blockquote type=cite pre wrap=I had to do this a couple times lately .. this is the simple st way I've found. It's not elegant or nifty, but it works. on the master: grep zone named.conf | awk '{print

RE: number of zones not matching

2009-03-20 Thread Todd Snyder
BIND does NOT load RFC1918 zones. The Internet-Draft that will allow that has been stalled for over a year now. Once that draft clears the working group the #if 0/#endif around the RFC 1918 zones will be removed. Perhaps I am confused by terminology. I am referring