In message , Warren Kumari wri
tes:
>
> On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Todd Snyder wrote:
>
> >>> do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND?
> >>> =
>
> >>> One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than =
>
> >>> the other=8A
> >>> =
>
> >>> www.example.com IN A
On Jan 16, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Todd Snyder wrote:
>>> do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND?
>>>
>>> One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than
>>> the otherŠ
>>>
>>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
>>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
>>> www.example.c
>> do you propose he specify the ratios with BIND?
>>
>> One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than
>> the otherŠ
>>
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.2
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>> One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the
>> otherŠ
>>
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3
>> www.example.com IN A 192.168.
On 16/01/12 20:52, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>>
>>> In article ,
>>> Simon wrote:
>>>
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a more detailed version:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.htm
In article ,
Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
>
> > In article ,
> > Simon wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> sure it is.
> >>
> >> Here a more detailed version:
> >> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
> >
> > RR usually results in roughly equal
On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote:
> In article ,
> Simon wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> sure it is.
>>
>> Here a more detailed version:
>> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
>
> RR usually results in roughly equal load balancing. He said he wants
> one of the addresses to
In article ,
Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sure it is.
>
> Here a more detailed version:
> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
RR usually results in roughly equal load balancing. He said he wants
one of the addresses to get MORE traffic than the other. How do you
propose he specify the r
In article ,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 13.01.12 22:40, MyDots.net wrote:
> >Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
> >load balancing a special record?
> >for example,
> >
> >www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
> >www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
>
> kin
With stock DNS, no; all you can do is recommend by ordering the responses.
But there are solutions. There are load-balancing DNS servers (they have a
pool of responses, and hand out an answer of that pool, based on rules, and
can even remove an answer from the pool if a watchdog/monitor fails). F5
On 13.01.12 22:40, MyDots.net wrote:
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
kind of.
I want the first one to get more web traffic than the secon
Hi,
sure it is.
Here a more detailed version:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html
Regards,
Simon
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:40:31 +0800, MyDots.net wrote:
Hi,
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
www.example.co
Hi,
Is there a good way of running the current BIND (9.7 and later) for
load balancing a special record?
for example,
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1
www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2
I want the first one to get more web traffic than the second one.
I know other 4 or 7 layer software (l
13 matches
Mail list logo
