Re: Writeable file already in use

> Change the filenames on the slave, or just don't have a "file" option > in the slave zone configuration. I was going to yell "TIL from Evan, that 'file' is optional for a slave", but /etc/named.conf:545: zone 'example.com': missing 'file' entry This is on 9.10.3. Did I misunderstand

Re: Writeable file already in use

> but I believe it's optional otherwise. You are correct (of course). I had inline signing enabled. For a non-signed zone I note the transfer indeed works without a 'file' specification, and I note it's not stored on file anywhere (just in core). Thanks for clarifying. -JP

Re: Writeable file already in use

> I was going to yell "TIL from Evan, that 'file' is optional for a > slave", but > > /etc/named.conf:545: zone 'example.com': missing 'file' entry > > This is on 9.10.3. Did I misunderstand you? Do you use inline-signing? It's mandatory in that case (named needs to know where to put

Re: Writeable file already in use

Jan-Piet Mens wrote: > > For a non-signed zone I note the transfer indeed works without a 'file' > specification, and I note it's not stored on file anywhere (just in > core). Yes, so (as you have probably guessed) the server has to retransfer the zone from scratch when it

Re: Writeable file already in use

In article , Alan Clegg wrote: > On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: > >> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones. > > > > .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to

Re: Writeable file already in use

On 05/01/2016 17:03, Barry Margolin wrote: > The in-memory copy is likely to end up in the swap partition. A swap partition? I don't think I've seen one of those for years... Ray ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Writeable file already in use

Am 05.01.2016 um 18:03 schrieb Barry Margolin: In article , Alan Clegg wrote: On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones. .. or even just want to look at

Re: Writeable file already in use

On 1/5/16 6:26 AM, Jan-Piet Mens wrote: >> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones. > > .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to > recurse to a `dig axfr'). > > I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave ;-) I ran into one

Re: Does EDNS0 work with bind-9.10.3-P2?

Hi Sury On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:50:39PM +0800, Sury Bu wrote: > I installed the latest version of bind-9.10.3-P2 but when I using dig > EDNS feature with +subnet, I found my local DNS can not carry client > subnet, does this version support EDNS0 now? 9.10 branch as no support for ECS except

Does EDNS0 work with bind-9.10.3-P2?

Hi all, I installed the latest version of bind-9.10.3-P2 but when I using dig EDNS feature with +subnet, I found my local DNS can not carry client subnet, does this version support EDNS0 now? [root@test ~]# dig @8.8.8.8 www.google.com +subnet=8.8.8.8 ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P2 <<>> @8.8.8.8

RE: Writeable file already in use

http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/190398/do-i-need-swap-space-if-i-have-more-than-enough-amount-of-ram - Kevin -Original Message- From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org

Re: Writeable file already in use

Am 05.01.2016 um 19:05 schrieb Darcy Kevin (FCA): http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/190398/do-i-need-swap-space-if-i-have-more-than-enough-amount-of-ram and the answer is clearly NO if you have *enough* RAM you just have to define the "enough" which means your workload and your useful

Re: Writeable file already in use

and to finish that topic: in days of zram (it's in the mainline kernel for a long time - https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/blockdev/zram.txt) when you think you need some swap for whatever reason you use that just because modern hardware has left so many cpu cycles left that it don't

Re: Does EDNS0 work with bind-9.10.3-P2?

Hi Mukund, Thanks for your reply, and do you know what bind version will support ECS option? On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote: > Hi Sury > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 10:50:39PM +0800, Sury Bu wrote: > > I installed the latest version of bind-9.10.3-P2 but

Re: Does EDNS0 work with bind-9.10.3-P2?

Hi Sury On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:35:37PM +0800, Sury Bu wrote: > Hi Mukund, > > Thanks for your reply, and do you know what bind version will support > ECS option? BIND 9.11 will introduce authoritative support for ECS. Mukund signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [openssl-users] OPenssl and dependencies such as openssh

OPENSSL_DIR > > #endif /* OPENSSL_API_COMPAT */ > > > > Users who want to make sure they are avoiding interfaces that are > > deprecated with 1.1.0 can set OPENSSL_API_COMPAT to 0x1010L or > > higher as appropriate. > > > Tip of the iceberg. &g

Re: Writeable file already in use

> This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones. .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to recurse to a `dig axfr'). I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave ;-) -JP ___ Please

Re: Writeable file already in use

Jan-Piet Mens wrote: > This might make you sad if you have lots of zones or large zones. > .. or even just want to look at what was transferred (whitout having to > recurse to a `dig axfr'). > > I see no reason to omit 'file' (except on a diskless slave Or if you care about