On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:35 -0800, Chris Buxton wrote:
Use a firewall (with deep packet inspection) to restrict by subnet.
Then use the TSIG key in the allow-update statement.
Unfortunately, to my knowledge, that's the only way to do this.
Wouldn't using a BIND view to restrict by
in the DNSKEY RRsets of multiple zones.
I haven't read 4033/4034 thoroughly, so it's possible I may
have misunderstood completely.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 11:47 -0500, Todd Snyder wrote:
I was under the (likely mistaken) impression that over 512 wasn't
allowed, but there it is ...
I could very well be completely messed up regarding the rules, so
please
forgive my ignorance. If you know my answer is in TFM, please batter
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 12:44 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
You should talk to your ISP to chase the traffic back to
its source and get BCP 38 implemented there. BCP 38 is ~10
years old now. There is no excuse for not filtering spoofed
traffic.
Absolutely.
On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 10:25 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
One way to test is to have a test box that sends spoofed traffic
to a machine you control.
Thanks, Mark.
That tells me pretty well what I needed to know, but
hoped not to hear: I have to build my own bot-net. 8-)
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 19:14 -0600, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Maybe we should just remove the immediately part.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
If you're going to make a change, adding a little more
information wouldn't hurt, would it? Perhaps:
s/immediately/cleanly
[ Copied to list to let other know
that this question has been answered ]
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 18:08 +0330, Bind wrote:
# netstat -an |grep 53 |wc
3911223 20656
is first number the total queries which asked from my server on port
53 or
number of sessions
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 16:57 +, Chris Thompson wrote:
I would welcome feedback on
http://people.pwf.cam.ac.uk/cet1/prune-reverse-zones
which describes a scheme we are experimenting with for reverse
lookup. (Executive summary: take RFC 2317 and carry the ideas
to their [possibly]
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 16:58 -0800, Chris Buxton wrote:
Use a different key for each slave.
Definitely, if each of your slaves is under distinct
administration.
If some organization is managing more than one of your
slaves for you, I'ld suggest using a distinct
joe(user)8: uname -a
Linux marlay.no8.be 2.6.9-1.667 #1 Tue Nov 2 14:41:31 EST 2004 i586 i586 i386
GNU/Linux
joe(user)9: named -v
BIND 9.4.2-P1
joe(user)10: grep INSIST /var/log/messages.1
Feb 13 14:12:57 marlay named[2226]: adb.c:1526: INSIST(find-adbname == ((void
*)0)) failed
joe(user)11:
On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 12:17 +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
It should be unrelated. I would however still upgrade.
Thanks, Mark.
If I don't see the same assertion failure with
the current release, I guess that's closed.
One advantage of upgrading is getting all
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:09 -0600, David Forrest wrote:
To get rid of all those nice log entries, I have this in my
named.conf:
Thanks, David.
For now, they're not so frequent as to be a nuisance.
/Niall
___
bind-users
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 13:07 -0500, John Wobus wrote:
Any especially good or bad practices? Things that have worked well
or poorly? Right now, I'm leaning toward having the caching server
transfer key zones.
Works for me.
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin
and succeeds
after a couple of seconds.
Best regards
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:41 -0500, Peter Laws wrote:
Seriously, though, what is the default quota and is it actually
configurable?
Sorry. No idea what or whether. RTFM time for us both! 8-)
Although the '... quota reached' messages alarmed me at first,
the following
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 19:46 -0400, terry+bindus...@tmk.com wrote:
Importantly, neither the masters nor ns1/2/3 have different zone data in
different views - the answers are always the same.
If you don't have different zone data per view, I don't
understand what purpose the views
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:25 -0400, John D. Vo wrote:
What do you guys use to turn this:
--- Statistics Dump --- (1238151600)
+++ Statistics Dump +++ (1238155200)
success 3280261
referral 363
nxrrset 745513
nxdomain 392614
recursion 1173408
failure 1115632
--- Statistics Dump ---
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 23:48 -0400, Terry Kennedy wrote:
If you can describe how to handle the recursion issue without using
views or multiple DNS servers, I'd be very interested.
Perhaps
allow-recursion { address_match_list };
would meet your needs. See section 6 of the
is NOT
a master, you'll need to take some extra care.
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 10:18 -0400, James M wrote:
trying to
delete a nonexistant host does not return an error.
That seems reasonable to me, since the state of the
zone file after the transaction is indeed the state
which would be expected, had the host been present and
sandoche BALAKRICHENAN wrote:
I want to rewrite a query of the form
sgtin.5.4.0.0.0.1.3.2.4.5.6.7.6.id.onsam.test to
sgtin.5.4.0.0.0.1.3.2.4.5.6.7.6.id.onseu.test using NAPTR rewrite.
The NAPTR RR in the zone config is as follows:
sgtin.5.4.0.0.0.1.3.2.4.5.6.7.6.id.onsam.testIN
Todd Snyder wrote:
Do you have notify no; in your config options?
... and you replied, No.
What may be useful, and I haven't seen suggested in the other
replies so far, is to check your logs (and eventually
packet-captures) to confirm that the master is indeed
relationship has a specific secret,
but we, as well as any organization carrying multiple
zone instances for us, are spared the administrative
overhead of managing too many secrets.
ATB
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
Akolinare wrote:
Hello Mark,
thank you very much for your quick answer.
I'm sorry for express unclear.
Creating of the reverse zone file is good documented and no problem. Both
nameserver are already set up and work fine, except that the queries for the
special subnets are not delegate from
Evan Hunt wrote:
reading carefully to the end of the line and notice that the 2006
Perhaps some people who did
validate the files were similarly incautious.
Or decided, taking account of the circumstances, not to treat
expired as a synonym for not trustworthy.
/Niall
, but only ever as a
consequence of a back-hoe incident or similar catastrophe which
isolates one of our campuses where there is a local resolving
server.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
see the point.
If you need some code, other than BIND named, to handle
recursive queries from your clients, why not just have
that code listening on the addresses configured in the
stub resolver on each of the client systems?
Best regards,
Niall
,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
names for which your name server is
authoritative; likewise for more lines with subnets.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
sudo bin/tests/system/ifconfig.sh down
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind
, which
isn't authoritative for the zone of interest, so dig follows
the referral chain until it arrives at ns2.dns-diy.com, which
is also authoritative, and so provides dig with the result
you asked for.
I hope this helps.
Best regards
Niall
; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; WARNING: recursion requested but not available
[SNIP]
Se last line.
Ehm, no.
With +trace, dig doesn't request recursion, but takes
control of following the referral chain itself.
Best regards
Niall
,
or other sources of information.
I hope this helps.
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 29 Sep 2010, at 09:34, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Now, I have been given 2 keys, t1 and t2, to use for transferring z1 and
z2 respectively.
[Wandering off topic, perhaps]
That seems to me a back-to-front way to do things.
If the organization running the master is
On 29 Sep 2010, at 15:53, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
Anyway, I discussed this with my colleague here, and we came up with a
solution that works. We have created 2 views of the master name servers:
Nice one, and useful to have in the mailing-list archive!
/Niall
when you take one of
your authoritative servers down.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
.
As it happens, 'dig' also makes a recursive query by default,
although it's easy to tell it not to. Besides, 'dig' just
shows the flags; it doesn't convert them into potentially
disturbing messages.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
on the NOTIFY.
That should make it clear what's not happening without
manual intervention.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
are excellent.
Either of these will give you some ideas about what to include in
the script you want to write.
Have fun!
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo
On 22 Jan 2011, at 18:29, jeffreyp wrote:
it's the transfers that are not happening. and, specifically, just the
transfers of the internal view to the slave on the different subnet.
You've mentioned that the slave receives and logs the NOTIFY.
Do you see it (trying to) start
On 10 Mar 2011, at 08:44, Torinthiel wrote:
Bujt the
procedure still is same.
A solution (not necessarilty better) involving less typing
would be
dig +trace dnsbed.com ns
/Niall
___
bind-users mailing list
pint $foo-reverse_ip()
2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.b.d.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa.
pint ^D
dhcp-c101a88b(niall)6:
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
name servers. If you think you've
already done this, you should look for a spelling error or an omitted
dot.
Kind regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
this helps.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
for clarifying, Kevin.
I hadn't tried the Undelegated domain test until just now.
I see.
Best rregards
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
packet capture to find out what's not happening.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
. You might find
https://www.dns-oarc.net/oarc/services/porttest an
interesting read.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
Since quite a few years, I habitually run 'make test' after building
BIND
from sources. I'me seiing a failure with 9.8.1-P1, and wonder whether
anyone else is also.
Relevant log fragment is shown below.
/Niall
S:xfer:Tue Nov 22 11:12:07 GMT 2011
On 22/11/11 18:10, /dev/rob0 wrote:
Is this a manifestation of the same issue as brought up last week?
https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2011-November/085593.html
I don't think so. I can compile without problem.
I see a failure during 'make test' processing, and
On 1 Feb 2012, at 09:52, Phil Mayers wrote:
As is probably obvious, I consider it an irritating bug ;o)
+1
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 8 Mar 2012, at 02:58, Lyle Giese wrote (on bind-users):
On linux boxes, adding
options rotate
to the /etc/resolv.conf helps.
[cross-posted, reply-to header set]
Is there a DHCP option which expresses that, and which
typical fielded DHCP clients will respect?
to contributing some effort to such a project.
ATB
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman
.
The devil is in the details, which I'll spare you! 8-)
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org
expect
to see these all the time when you run a resolver. There are
broken and misconfigured servers out there!
I hope this helps.
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
expected to happen,
and what actually happened.
People won't help unless they believe you're making a serious
effort; so far, you haven't sent anything which might convince
them.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin
captive
view internal {
match-clients { internal-clients; };
// view details go here ...
};
// standard view: 'general'
view general {
match-clients { any; };
// view details go here ...
};
I hope this helps.
Niall O'Reilly
On 3 Jul 2012, at 21:21, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
Just giving a feedback, this method worked great, but in my case, didn't have
no negate the keys in the ACL (like the example below), I created one key for
each ACL in my configuration and used that ACL for the match-clients
directive in
On 10/07/12 18:07, Bennett, Gary L. wrote:
No, have that part. Was just wondering which domain-name-servers parm,
global or in DHCP address pool, has precedence. Thanks.
The more specific specific over-rides the global one.
Niall O'Reilly
.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 16 Aug 2012, at 15:42, Christopher Cain wrote:
Of course a dig query will fail without the domain appended. Dig takes
you query at face value and will not append domains from your search
suffix list like nslookup and ping will. You ALWAYS have to fully qualify
your requests when using
resources to
chasing a moving target.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
On 18 Sep 2012, at 14:45, M. Meadows wrote:
dig www.careerone.com.au +short @8.8.8.8
www.careerone.com.au.edgesuite.net.
a903.g.akamai.net.
208.44.23.99
208.44.23.121
Why does the above dig work when
If you try
dig +trace www.careerone.com.au
you'll find that the
On 21 Sep 2012, at 08:55, Adam Tkac wrote:
Because rc2 was released too late to get it into RHEL 6.3... Btw which is the
bug that bothers you? Why don't you report it to RH bugzilla?
I don't understand why RH would choose to include a release candidate
rather than a stable
instead of BOOTP.
Jim Glassford's suggestion seems good enough to me.
On 18 Oct 2012, at 14:28, Jim Glassford wrote:
We just continue to deny bootp for subnets that have no need for it and
ignore them.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin
The example in the last one is extracted from a live configuration
which I'm responsible for.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin IT Services
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 17 Jan 2013, at 20:58, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote:
Syslog as the default is perfectly fine with us.
Please keep that as the default, following the
principle of least astonishment.
I do also use the rotated file method a few places, so hoping that doesn't
disappear.
On 18 Jan 2013, at 06:27, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
Could CLI utility be man(1) and info(1)? :-)
It could, yes, but `b10-msg NNN` isn't going to break BIND 10's
development budget (I hope),
+1
and I feel it to be more practical than
scrolling through a man page with 900+
?
Definitely.
Do any packagers provide a configuration with different-than-default
logging setup? (What and why?)
I'm sorry; I don't know. Apart from one exceptional NetBSD
box, I always build from source and avoid whatever the
packager offers.
Best regards
Niall
On 15 Feb 2013, at 05:57, Jan-Piet Mens wrote:
would there be a chance of ISC adding this to stock
BIND9? Even better: would ISC take on the work of doing it? ;-)
FWIW: +1
/Niall
___
Please visit
On 14 Mar 2013, at 15:57, Chris Buxton wrote:
No, I'm pretty sure the OP wants to strip records from responses if the
records are A records referring to private address space (RFC 1918).
I've no idea how you would do this.
Other than separate views, with a trimmed zone in the
On 14 Mar 2013, at 16:22, Chris Buxton wrote:
Well, yes, if the server in question is authoritative for all the data in
question. But if it's just a resolver, that may be more difficult.
Fair comment.
I was (perhaps naïvely) being led by my aversion to open resolvers
,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
@127.0.0.1 ...
you can be sure that the server on which your shell session is running
is the one to which dig sends the query. If this is not what you need,
use the address of the server's network interface.
ATB
Niall O'Reilly
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:57:44 -0400
Novosielski, Ryan novos...@umdnj.edu wrote:
The short answer is some software once cared. Does it still now, I'm
not sure. But we do it.
Some still does
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https
On 15 Jul 2013, at 12:49, Grace Ingabire wrote:
The issue is now resolved, my master was not configured properly!
There's something else: LTD.RW seems not to be delegated.
The problem seems to be masked from you because this zone
and its parent are both hosted on
On 22 Nov 2011, at 11:24, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
Since quite a few years, I habitually run 'make test' after building BIND
from sources. I'me seiing a failure with 9.8.1-P1, and wonder whether
anyone else is also.
[By way of putting this to bed, at last ...]
Updating
On 20 Aug 2013, at 15:08, Chris Buxton wrote:
There is a mailing list for Net::DNS.
List-Subscribe: https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/net-dns-users,
mailto:net-dns-users-requ...@nlnetlabs.nl?subject=subscribe
That said, there was a discussion last December about what has changed
www.example.com as a tiny dynamic zone and update it
directly.
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman
On 11 Sep 2013, at 17:24, Maria Iano wrote:
What does it mean when the edns0 response to a dig says the overall packet
size will be one value
Not will be one value but can be no more than that value.
but the message size reported is different.
That's the actual size of the
-council-shares-its-report-on-dns-based-internet-filtering.html
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
Member of AFNIC's Conseil Scientifique
PS. I wan't a significant contributor to this report.
Credit for that belongs to the colleagues who did the work. /Niall
) in the zone file you're using.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo
On 18 Dec 2013, at 15:19, houguanghua houguang...@hotmail.com wrote:
Is there any way to enable the Additional Section? Thanks.
The server sends data in the additional section if either
(a) these data are required, or (b) the server supports
and is configured to send
the configuration of this server, I expect you're in a
position to determine what owner name is passed to the DNS server,
and that this approach might be what you need.
This thread probably belongs better on the dhcp-users list ...
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please
is giving these
messages can reach any of the root servers or even any of the
external Internet.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
At Tue, 29 Apr 2014 10:24:58 +,
houguanghua wrote:
Yes, I had asked the same question months ago.
I'm designing how to protect DNS for an ISP. The zones are not owned
by the ISP. The ISP wants to proect the DNS query during attacking.
So it's not standard DNS solution. During the
, please see
http://serverfault.com/questions/498500/why-does-the-host-command-not-resolve-entries-in-etc-hosts
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users
At Tue, 21 Oct 2014 22:31:28 -0500,
Frank Bulk wrote:
Dave,
Thanks for the input, but what I was looking for was a dig command that
returns the IP(s) or a fail. It looks like the host command is the right
solution in this case, not dig.
Doesn't egrep fail on no match?
Niall
At Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:17:49 +0100,
Sam Wilson wrote:
In article mailman.1128.1414072988.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Bob Harold rharo...@umich.edu wrote:
Anytime you see 'grep' and 'cut' used together, they can usually be
shortened to just 'awk', which requires starting one less
At Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:17:49 +0100,
Sam Wilson wrote:
In article mailman.1128.1414072988.26362.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
Bob Harold rharo...@umich.edu wrote:
Anytime you see 'grep' and 'cut' used together, they can usually be
shortened to just 'awk', which requires starting one less
, network problems, or some
combination of these. Your logs will help identify which.
I hope this helps.
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing
, network problems, or some
combination of these. Your logs will help identify which.
I hope this helps.
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing
At Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:50:37 +,
Darcy Kevin (FCA) wrote:
The parameter that is glaringly missing from your list is
“recursive-clients”. Do you have that set at default value (1000) or
have you bumped it up higher? Since you say that this happens at “peak
hours”, recursive-clients is
At Sat, 3 Jan 2015 19:24:47 +0100,
Christian Kette wrote:
I have found a workaround.
I defined a different zone for every network
A simpler solution might be to use a sortlist.
From the ARM:
6.2.16.13 The sortlist Statement
The response to a DNS query may consist of multiple resource
On Wed, 27 May 2015 07:50:12 +0100,
Lucio Crusca wrote:
I've now fixed the MNAME and I have to wait propagation before testing
again, but I'm really confident it will solve the problem,
Fammi sapere, per piacere ...
Niall
___
Please visit
what I should do for getting rid of this issue.
You need to use as many copies of each zone file as you have views
needing to write to it.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
option
referencing the first view.
I hope this helps.
Best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https
On Fri, 29 May 2015 11:25:48 +0100,
Cathy Almond wrote:
From 9.10.0 there is a new zone type 'in-view'. From the release notes:
Neat!
Thanks and best regards,
Niall O'Reilly
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
