Hi All,
Help!
Fedora 26 x64
Xfce 4.12
# rpm -qa \bind\*
bind-libs-lite-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind99-libs-9.9.10-1.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind-chroot-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind-license-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.noarch
bind-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind-libs-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind99-license-9.9.10-1.P2.f
that did the trick. Thank you
On Wed, 09 Aug 2017 15:19:02 -0700 Reindl
Harald wrote
[Service]
Type=simple
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this
Hi All,
Fedora 26 x64
Xfce 4.12
# rpm -qa \bind\*
bind-libs-lite-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind99-libs-9.9.10-1.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind-chroot-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind-license-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.noarch
bind-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind-libs-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
bind99-license-9.9.10-1.P2.fc26.noa
Hi All,
Fedora 26
bind-chroot-9.11.1-2.P2.fc26.x86_64
I am stumped. I need to be able to look up short names on my local network.
Long names work:
# host pop3.xxx.local
pop3.xxx.local is an alias for FedoraServer.xxx.local.
FedoraServer.xxx.local has address 192.168.255.12
But not short nam
Hi All,
What does this SELinux error mean when I start bin-chroot?
# semanage fcontext -a -t FILE_TYPE 'session.key'
where FILE_TYPE is one of the following: dnssec_trigger_var_run_t,
ipa_var_lib_t, krb5_host_rcache_t, krb5_keytab_t, named_cache_t,
named_log_t, named_tmp_t,
On 08/10/2017 07:07 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 08/10/2017 06:21 PM, toddandmargo wrote:
Fedora 26
Fedora = Linux (vs Windows vs other)
I am stumped. I need to be able to look up short names on my local
network.
...
What am I missing?
domain and / or search configuration
On 08/11/2017 02:40 PM, ToddAndMargo wrote:
On 08/10/2017 07:07 PM, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
On 08/10/2017 06:21 PM, toddandmargo wrote:
Fedora 26
Fedora = Linux (vs Windows vs other)
I am stumped. I need to be able to look up short names on my local
network.
...
What am I
- Original Message -
From: "ToddAndMargo"
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 10:39:11 PM
Subject: Confused about SELinux error
Hi All,
What does this SELinux error mean when I start bin-chroot?
# semanage fcontext -a -t FILE_TYPE
Hi All,
I just upgraded from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34.
Bind was updated from 9.11 to 9.16 in Fedora 34.
It completely broke my Fedora 33 configuration.
Would someone please point me to the directions
as to how to migrate from 9.11 to 9.16?
Many thanks,
-T
On 6/12/21 5:30 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Hi All,
I just upgraded from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34.
Bind was updated from 9.11 to 9.16 in Fedora 34.
It completely broke my Fedora 33 configuration.
Would someone please point me to the directions
as to how to migrate from 9.11 to 9.16
On 6/12/21 7:49 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
Please don’t hid details if you want help.
If you really want help post all the un-doctored log messages.
B.T.W. The messages below are because you used the wrong zone name on the
named-checkconf command line. The zone file is for xyz.local and you said
On 6/12/21 8:30 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
# named-checkzone -t /var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves abc.local
abc.hosts.rev
abc.hosts.rev:3: ignoring out-of-zone data (255.168.192.in-addr.arpa)
abc.hosts.rev:14: ignoring out-of-zone data
abc.hosts(10.255.168.192.in-addr.arpa
On 6/12/21 10:55 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Most likely SELinux policy is preventing access to those files. Check the other
logs.
Ondřej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
No SE Linux error popping up. But I shut it off temporarily anyway. No
symptom change. Rats!
# setenforce Permissive
# sys
On 6/12/21 5:30 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Hi All,
I just upgraded from Fedora 33 to Fedora 34.
Bind was updated from 9.11 to 9.16 in Fedora 34.
It completely broke my Fedora 33 configuration.
Would someone please point me to the directions
as to how to migrate from 9.11 to 9.16
Oh but no errors and it still does not work!
# host 8.8.8.8
Host 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
# host 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
Using domain server:
Name: 8.8.4.4
Address: 8.8.4.4#53
Aliases: 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer dns.google.
and nothing appeared in /var/log/messages
T
On 6/12/21 11:47 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Oh but no errors and it still does not work!
# host 8.8.8.8
Host 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
# host 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
Using domain server:
Name: 8.8.4.4
Address: 8.8.4.4#53
Aliases: 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
On 6/13/21 12:13 AM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/12/21 11:47 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Oh but no errors and it still does not work!
# host 8.8.8.8
Host 8.8.8.8.in-addr.arpa not found: 2(SERVFAIL)
# host 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
Using domain server:
Name: 8.8.4.4
Address
Hi All,
Fedora 34
bind 9.16
The Duck is failing me.
Placing
include "/etc/named.root.key";
in my bind.conf, give me the following error:
# named-checkconf -l -t /var/named/chroot /etc/named.conf
/etc/named.root.key:1: option 'managed-keys' is deprecated
What do I use in its place?
Many th
Hi All,
Thank you all for the enormous help in me getting bind-chroot
working after upgrading to Fedora 34. Here are my notes.
Hope this helps someone else.
-T
Broken bind-chroot repair after upgrading to Fedora 34:
# means root
$ means user
1) temporary workaround so you can surf the Int
On 6/14/21 9:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 14:27 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.16/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.pdf
The modern-day RTFM :-)
-Jim P.
"Just Google it." The new RTFM. Chuckle!
And ' 'managed-keys' is deprecated" is
On 15-06-2021 07:46, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/14/21 9:30 PM, Jim Popovitch via bind-users wrote:
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 14:27 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.16/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.pdf
The modern-day RTFM :-)
-Jim P.
"Just Google it.&
On 6/14/21 10:02 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all for the enormous help in me getting bind-chroot
working after upgrading to Fedora 34. Here are my notes.
Hope this helps someone else.
-T
Well, if at first you don't succeed, revise! See
chang
On 6/15/21 12:51 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/14/21 10:02 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all for the enormous help in me getting bind-chroot
working after upgrading to Fedora 34. Here are my notes.
Hope this helps someone else.
-T
Here are my
On 6/15/21 6:59 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/15/21 12:51 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/14/21 10:02 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Hi All,
Thank you all for the enormous help in me getting bind-chroot
working after upgrading to Fedora 34. Here are my notes
On 6/15/21 11:54 PM, G.W. Haywood via bind-users wrote:
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Re: My FC33->FC34 bind-chroot upgrade notes
I hope this is the last time I have to revise this!
...
Unfortunately perhaps not.
:'(
...
# means root
$ means user
...
S
On 6/16/21 2:16 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 16.06.21 um 09:31 schrieb ToddAndMargo via bind-users:
...
# means root
$ means user
...
Sometimes, in your configuration file extracts, you use '#' meaning
'this line is a comment'. I guess this is a write-up for a novice.
Hi All,
In my named.conf
logging {
channel update_debug {
# file
"/var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/named-update-debug.log";
file "slaves/named-update-debug.log";
severity debug 3;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
On 6/16/21 12:45 PM, Richard T.A. Neal wrote:
On 16 June 2021 7:31 pm, ToddAndMargo wrote:
Does this alteration at the top make it any clearer?
Note: at the command prompt, I use the following terminology:
# means run as root
$ means run as user
Inside a file
On 6/17/21 3:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
however, in the real world just write "sudo command" is the best you can
do - for the average user it's complete and leaves no questions
for power users which don't like sudo it should be no deal-breaker to
type the command without "sudo" in a root shel
Hi All,
Fedora 34
bind-chroot-9.16.16-1.fc34.x86_64
I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files.
The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing by duplicating these two
files over into
/var/named/chroot/var/named/slaves/
with the identical inodes like it does with name
On 6/24/21 9:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing
mount --bind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972022#c3
It is not occurring on my zone files. Is it suppose to?
___
Please visit https
On 6/26/21 7:31 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/24/21 9:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing
mount --bind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972022#c3
It is not occurring on my zone files. Is it suppose to?
I have
On 6/27/21 3:40 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/26/21 7:31 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/24/21 9:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing
mount --bind
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1972022#c3
It is not
On 6/27/21 4:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
seriosly i am beginning to wonder if you should simply give up bind-chroot
Never quit! :-)
it's not the job of the chroot bind-mount setup to mount each and every
file and 'file "abc.hosts.rev"' without any path makes no sense
just write your file
On 6/24/21 9:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 34
bind-chroot-9.16.16-1.fc34.x86_64
I am trying to clean up my bind-chroot forward and reverse files.
The goal is to have bind-chroot do its thing by duplicating these two
files over into
/var/named/chroot/var
On 7/1/21 9:10 AM, Petr Menšík wrote:
Hi,
On 6/30/21 5:11 AM, ToddAndMargo via bind-users wrote:
On 6/27/21 4:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
seriosly i am beginning to wonder if you should simply give up bind-chroot
Never quit! :-)
Is is not a bad idea. If you are running SELinux in
36 matches
Mail list logo