-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 16:21 -0500, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
> OK, I'm ready to consider other registrars, any suggestions
> would be appreciated.
I like gkg.net - they have an API so you can automatically upload new DS
records when you do DNSSEC key
On 07/12/2017 03:21 PM, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
OK, I'm ready to consider other registrars, any suggestions
would be appreciated.
$Dynadot++ has been good to me. I can pay them via PayPal and they
support DS records for DNSSEC if you eventually want to mess with that.
- I think they were
Hi Reindl:
On Tue 7/11/17 18:05 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 11.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb b...@zq3q.org:
> > Assume I register domain 'mynew.org' with registrar namecheap; and as an
> > exercise,
> > I plan to setup my own two authoritative DNS nameservers for 'mynew.org'.
> >
> > I have
b...@zq3q.org wrote:
> One of my real hosts is below xen.prgmr.com, like the fake 'zap' above,
> so I would have to email prgmr.com support to get them to add
>
> mynew.org. IN NS zap.xen.prgmr.com.
> ^^^ << Is this valid?
>
> to the
On 11 Jul 2017, at 22:01, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
As I wrote to Niall (msg dated 11 Jul 2017 15:04:32 -0500) ,
That hasn't reached me yet.
I **do not** have a NS record for each of my two
nameservers, in the domain zone that the respective nameserver itself
is in.
That is a mistake, I need
Hi Matthew:
On Tue 7/11/17 15:24 +0100 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 2017/07/11 14:57, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
>
> > I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
> > for the nameservers for 'mynew.org'. **Neither are in 'mynew.org';
> > is that going to work?**
>
> Yes, that
Hi Niall:
On Tue 7/11/17 15:24 +0100 "Niall O'Reilly" wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2017, at 14:57, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
>
> > Assume I register domain 'mynew.org' with registrar namecheap; and as
> > an exercise,
> > I plan to setup my own two authoritative DNS nameservers for
> > 'mynew.org'.
> >
> > I
Am 11.07.2017 um 20:56 schrieb b...@zq3q.org:
On Tue 7/11/17 15:23 +0100 Tony Finch wrote:
b...@zq3q.org wrote:
I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
for the nameservers for 'mynew.org'. Neither are in 'mynew.org';
is that going to work?
On Tue 7/11/17 15:23 +0100 Tony Finch wrote:
> b...@zq3q.org wrote:
>
> > I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
> > for the nameservers for 'mynew.org'. Neither are in 'mynew.org';
> > is that going to work?
>
> Yes, that is perfectly normal. For
Am 11.07.2017 um 15:57 schrieb b...@zq3q.org:
Assume I register domain 'mynew.org' with registrar namecheap; and as an
exercise,
I plan to setup my own two authoritative DNS nameservers for 'mynew.org'.
I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
for the nameservers
On 11 Jul 2017, at 14:57, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
Assume I register domain 'mynew.org' with registrar namecheap; and as
an exercise,
I plan to setup my own two authoritative DNS nameservers for
'mynew.org'.
I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
for the nameservers
On 2017/07/11 14:57, b...@zq3q.org wrote:
> I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
> for the nameservers for 'mynew.org'. **Neither are in 'mynew.org';
> is that going to work?**
Yes, that will work. There is no requirement for any of the NSes for a
zone to be part
b...@zq3q.org wrote:
> I have several linux VMs, that are under used, so I want to use them
> for the nameservers for 'mynew.org'. Neither are in 'mynew.org';
> is that going to work?
Yes, that is perfectly normal. For example,
$ dig +noall +answer ns dotat.at
dotat.at.
13 matches
Mail list logo