Re: 9.9.0rc1: example from arm 4.8.3 does not validate

2012-01-19 Thread Axel Rau

Am 18.01.2012 um 23:54 schrieb Evan Hunt:

 I tried the example from page 23 with a local zone, a trusted key and
 inline-signing, like:
 [...]
 But I'm getting no ad-flag:
 
 That's normal; authoritative servers don't set the AD bit, validating
 resolvers do.  (There's not much point in having an authoritative server
 validate its own answers.)
Can dig tell me, if the sigs are valid, if I provide my trusted key?
Or do I need a 2nd (validating) ns?

Axel
---
PGP-Key:29E99DD6  ☀ +49 151 2300 9283  ☀ computing @ chaos claudius

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: 9.9.0rc1: example from arm 4.8.3 does not validate

2012-01-19 Thread David Forrest

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Axel Rau wrote:



Am 18.01.2012 um 23:54 schrieb Evan Hunt:


I tried the example from page 23 with a local zone, a trusted key and
inline-signing, like:
[...]
But I'm getting no ad-flag:


That's normal; authoritative servers don't set the AD bit, validating
resolvers do.  (There's not much point in having an authoritative server
validate its own answers.)

Can dig tell me, if the sigs are valid, if I provide my trusted key?
Or do I need a 2nd (validating) ns?

Axel


One needs to ask a non-authoritative validating server.  For checking our 
publicly available DNSSEC signed site, I use the available recursing 
validating oarc server.


dig +dnssec @bind.odvr.dns-oarc.net maplepark.com

and get the flags returned in a crontab script that checks it daily for 
the ad flag.


Dave
--
David Forrest   e-mail   drf @ maplepark.com
Maple Park Development Corporation  http://xen.maplepark.com
St. Louis, Missouri
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: 9.9.0rc1: example from arm 4.8.3 does not validate

2012-01-18 Thread Evan Hunt

 I tried the example from page 23 with a local zone, a trusted key and
 inline-signing, like:
 [...]
 But I'm getting no ad-flag:

That's normal; authoritative servers don't set the AD bit, validating
resolvers do.  (There's not much point in having an authoritative server
validate its own answers.)

-- 
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


RE: 9.9.0rc1: example from arm 4.8.3 does not validate

2012-01-18 Thread Spain, Dr. Jeffry A.
 I tried the example from page 23 with a local zone, a trusted key and 
 inline-signing, ...
 But I'm getting no ad-flag

I think that is expected behavior when you query an authoritative server 
directly. For example, our authoritative server:
dig @ns1.countryday.net countryday.net dnskey +dnssec
also returns no ad flag, but if you run the same query from a DNSSEC-enabled 
recursive resolver, you will get an ad flag.

Regards, Jeff
 
Jeffry A. Spain
Network Administrator
Cincinnati Country Day School

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users