Re: Stats ouput 9.3 vs 9.7

2011-09-07 Thread Alan Clegg
On 9/7/2011 11:13 AM, Baird, Josh wrote: Is there a way to revert back to the old stats format? Is there an easier way to reveal query stats via SNMP in 9.7? Any recommendations? I'm really looking to get QPS statistics. I can modify my parser script if necessary, but I thought I would

Re: Stats ouput 9.3 vs 9.7

2011-09-07 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:13:28 -0500, Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com wrote: Just upgraded some authoritative boxes to RHEL6, thus upgrading to BIND 9.7.3. On RHEL5 (BIND 9.3.x), I had scripts that parsed the output of the named.stats file, and piped them through net-snmpd so my NMS could

RE: Stats ouput 9.3 vs 9.7

2011-09-07 Thread Baird, Josh
@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Alan Clegg Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16 PM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Stats ouput 9.3 vs 9.7 On 9/7/2011 11:13 AM, Baird, Josh wrote: Is there a way to revert back to the old stats format? Is there an easier way to reveal query stats via SNMP in 9.7

Re: stats brainteaser

2009-07-31 Thread Rick Dicaire
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Toddcanada...@gmail.com wrote: I've got a monitoring script in place that does an rndc stats and parses the output, then graphs it for me nicely. How is this being monitored? Are you sure its not an artifact of your monitoring software? I see this behaviour

Re: stats brainteaser

2009-07-31 Thread Hauke Lampe
Todd wrote: Yesterday I needed to flush the cache on a number of my servers, and I saw a big spike in queries recorded by the server in the success category. The spike was about 40% more than the usual traffic. After a cache flush, the server has to re-fetch glue and nameserver records from

RE: Stats

2009-03-27 Thread Todd Snyder
I know that people may laugh, but when I need to look at the stats, I pump the data into excel. A quick script turns that data into csv, pull into excel, highlght, graph, done! I've seen people using Cacti for graphing the numbers. RRD would work too, I believe. I expect you could feed the

Re: Stats

2009-03-27 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 09:25 -0400, John D. Vo wrote: What do you guys use to turn this: --- Statistics Dump --- (1238151600) +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1238155200) success 3280261 referral 363 nxrrset 745513 nxdomain 392614 recursion 1173408 failure 1115632 --- Statistics Dump ---

Re: Stats

2009-03-27 Thread Alan Clegg
John D. Vo wrote: What do you guys use to turn this: --- Statistics Dump --- (1238151600) +++ Statistics Dump +++ (1238155200) success 3280261 referral 363 nxrrset 745513 nxdomain 392614 recursion 1173408 failure 1115632 --- Statistics Dump --- (1238155200) into something more

Re: Stats collection script for BIND 9.5 (and greater?)

2008-12-18 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:38:49 +0100, Alexander Gall g...@switch.ch wrote: Yes, if that assumption is correct, I don't see a big problem sticking to version 1.0 for the new format in 9.6.0 and 9.5.1. Still, if you do manage to get this particular change in (I guess it would be extremely