On 17-Feb-22 04:06, G.W. Haywood wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Grant Taylor wrote:
Please clarify if you are talking about DNSSEC for your own zone that
they are doing secondary transfers of or if you are talking about
DNSSEC for the IPv6's reverse DNS namespace that they delegate to
Hi Grant,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2022, Grant Taylor wrote:
Please clarify if you are talking about DNSSEC for your own zone that
they are doing secondary transfers of or if you are talking about DNSSEC
for the IPv6's reverse DNS namespace that they delegate to you.
Ah, good point Grant.
The
Tower, 3rd Floor | PO Box: 15224,
Doha – Qatar
E-mail: a.ba...@salaminternational.com| Website: www.salaminternational.com
-Original Message-
From: bind-users On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 6:53 PM
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: ipv6
On 2/16/22 9:24 AM, G.W. Haywood via bind-users wrote:
FWIW I've been using DNSSEC with HE slaves since October 2017. I'm
happy to report that I've never had any problem with the service.
Please clarify if you are talking about DNSSEC for your own zone that
they are doing secondary transfers
> On 16 Feb 2022, at 23:38, Andrew Baker via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> Firstly, thanks for the advice about the hidden master the other day, that’s
> now setup, working fine and we’ve just finished transferring about 4500
> records across!
> My software team came up this morning and slapped
Hi there,
On Wed, 16 Feb 2022, Mark Tinka wrote:
On 2/16/22 17:18, Timothe Litt wrote:
> You can get IPv6 via a tunnel broker.? Hurricane Electric
> (http://he.net/) is one of the larger ones.? You can get a /48 from
> them - for free.? Bandwidth is modest.? You can setup reverse zones;
>
On 2/16/22 17:50, Grant Taylor via bind-users wrote:
Most of the -- what I'll call -- binary distributions of Linux tend to
have a fairly small range of any given versions of software in the
repositories provided by the Linux distribution provider.
There is nothing that prevents you from
> On 16 Feb 2022, at 16:50, Grant Taylor via bind-users
> wrote:
>
> On 2/16/22 7:35 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> I was assuming Linux has something similar, where in userland, you have the
>> option to install which train of BIND you want, regardless of OS version.
>
> Most of the -- what I'll
On 2/16/22 17:18, Timothe Litt wrote:
You can get IPv6 via a tunnel broker. Hurricane Electric
(http://he.net/) is one of the larger ones. You can get a /48 from
them - for free. Bandwidth is modest. You can setup reverse zones;
they'll delegate. I don't think they support DNSSEC -
On 2/16/22 7:35 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
I was assuming Linux has something similar, where in userland, you have
the option to install which train of BIND you want, regardless of OS
version.
Most of the -- what I'll call -- binary distributions of Linux tend to
have a fairly small range of any
> HE has a lot of IPv6 educational materials (not bind-specific) that are quite
> good.
I wasn't aware, but this looks worthy and I'm going to do it:
https://ipv6.he.net/certification/
Also to the OP here's another +1 that Debian 10 bind version does IPv6 just
fine, and +1 upgrade it anyway
On 16-Feb-22 07:38, Andrew Baker wrote:
Firstly, thanks for the advice about the hidden master the other day,
that’s now setup, working fine and we’ve just finished transferring
about 4500 records across!
My software team came up this morning and slapped me across the face
with a wet fish
> On 16. 2. 2022, at 14:50, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> not when you don't use 3rd party repos or build it at your own - the whole
> point of a stable distibution is to not have random major-upgrades of software
Technically, using ISC repositories would be 0-party as it’s upstream provider
of
On 2/16/22 15:49, Reindl Harald wrote:
not when you don't use 3rd party repos or build it at your own - the
whole point of a stable distibution is to not have random
major-upgrades of software
and unless you have no very good reason you should either stay at the
packages from your
Am 16.02.22 um 14:25 schrieb Mark Tinka:
On 2/16/22 14:38, Andrew Baker via bind-users wrote:
Firstly, we are running bind 9.11 on Debian 10 hosts.
* Is it worth use upgrading to Debian 11 to get the newer version of
bind?
I don't run Linux, but shouldn't it be possible to just
On 2/16/22 14:38, Andrew Baker via bind-users wrote:
Firstly, we are running bind 9.11 on Debian 10 hosts.
* Is it worth use upgrading to Debian 11 to get the newer version of
bind?
I don't run Linux, but shouldn't it be possible to just upgrade only
BIND on your current Linux
16 matches
Mail list logo
