Hi,
I need some help with a new package I'm coding (which we plan to
submit to BioC). I keep getting a warning in R CMD check that I
haven't been able to figure out what is wrong. I'm guessing that it's
something fairly straightforward, I'm just not seeing it right now.
The warning is:
checking
April 4, 2016
Bioconductors:
We are pleased to announce Bioconductor 3.3, consisting of 1211
software packages, 293 experiment data packages, and 916
up-to-date annotation packages.
There are 107 new software packages, and many updates and improvements
to existing packages; Bioconductor 3.3 is c
Hi Robert,
Thanks for reply.
What if I am interested in both showing raw counts and percentiles?
If this is not created and no one is willing to create sush shields, then I
can volounteer for that.
It'll be great to have some examples on how the percentile badges were
created.
Best,
Marcin
201
Never mind, I found it. Please try the checkout again now.
Dan
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Tenenbaum"
> To: "Billy Chang"
> Cc: "bioc-devel"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 11:59:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] svn co with username and password
> Whst is your svn username?
> Da
Whst is your svn username?
Dan
- Original Message -
> From: "Billy Chang"
> To: "bioc-devel"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 11:58:23 AM
> Subject: [Bioc-devel] svn co with username and password
> Dear All,
>
> I recently submitted a package called “GSALightning”. The package has been
Dear All,
I recently submitted a package called “GSALightning”. The package has been
accepted and I have received the svn credentials. However I am unable to
checkout the GSALightning package using my username and password.
If I use the username readonly and password readonly it works:
$
There were two small utility classes with finalizers defined. They seem to
be the culprits. I've removed those finalizers and haven't seen errors so
far.
Thanks!
Hector
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> Hi Michael, Hector,
>
> On 04/29/2016 01:11 PM, Michael Lawrence wrote:
>
That's correct.
Dan
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrzej Oleś"
> To: "Robert M. Flight"
> Cc: "Marcin Kosiński" , "bioc-devel"
> , "Dan Tenenbaum"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 8:15:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] downloads number status shields for packages
> Hi Marcin, Robert
Hi Marcin, Robert,
I think one problem with raw counts is that these reflect only downloads
from BioC servers and not from the mirrors - is that correct @Dan?
Cheers,
Andrzej
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Robert M. Flight
wrote:
> Those numbers are used to calculate the percentile download s
Those numbers are used to calculate the percentile download stat that is
already on a given bioconductor package landing page. See
http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/RTCGA.html
I believe this was the way the Bioc admins went instead of just raw
downloads.
-Robert
On Wed, May 4, 2
Hi all,
Have anyone considered creating shields (http://shields.io/) with the
status of total downloads number for packages held on bioc? This already
works for CRAN packages http://cranlogs.r-pkg.org/
It could take total `Nb of downloads` from the right table like here
http://bioconductor.org/pa
Dear Martin, Lori,
I’ve added support for the column “tx_name” (which will return the transcript
ID) to all ensembldb methods so that’s fine now. Apparently I was just a little
late, since that is now in the devel version 1.5.1.
thanks, jo
> On 03 May 2016, at 18:51, Martin Morgan wrote:
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
