Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
From: Shepherd, Lori
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 5:39 AM
To: Charles Warden ; 'Martin Morgan'
; 'Alexey Sergushichev'
Cc: 'bioc-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Thank you for your contributions to Bioconductor. We appreciate you fixing
COHCAP.
I will begin the deprecation process for sRAP; there is no further action
needed.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel
mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on
behalf of Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 3:53 PM
To: 'Martin Morgan' mailto:mtmorgan.b...@gmail.com>>;
'Alexey Sergushichev' mailto:alserg...@gmail.com>>
Cc: 'bioc-devel@r-project.org'
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Everybody,
Thank you again for your help!
I think the issue for the COHCAP devel package has now been resolved:
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/COHCAP/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/COHCAP/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!4pixzueuEashd7OMaAtrxWF6J7-9ZdkNh7lA1938iAeeYvzmbMVMrX-o7Sq7$>
I had somewhat similar error messages for sRAP (which is different than
COHCAP), but I am OK with sRAP being removed from the next version of
Bioconductor (since it is no longer being maintained). If you can please let
me know if there is a contact that I should e-mail (beyond this mailing list,
or not fixing the error), then I would appreciate that.
Thanks Again,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles Warden
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:40 PM
To: Martin Morgan mailto:mtmorgan.b...@gmail.com>>;
Alexey Sergushichev mailto:alserg...@gmail.com>>
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
Subject: RE: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Martin,
That is probably what happened.
Thank you again for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan mailto:mtmorgan.b...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:38 PM
To: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>; Alexey
Sergushichev mailto:alserg...@gmail.com>>
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
yes, use 1.33.1. Maybe you had a space between the '.' and the '1' or similar,
'1.33. 1' ? This generates an error
** using staged installation
Error : Invalid DESCRIPTION file
Malformed package version.
See section 'The DESCRIPTION file' in the 'Writing R Extensions'
manual.
ERROR: installing package DESCRIPTION failed for package ...
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:28 PM, "Charles Warden"
mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote:
Hi Martin,
I am currently having difficulty reproducing my earlier error (which I
think didn’t even get to the step of testing the demo code). So, I think the
short answer is that I should just use version 1.33.1.
In my search history, I can tell that I Googled "R Malformed package
version," so I think that was part of the earlier message that I got.
For what is worth, I think this is what gave me the idea to change the
version numbering system:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html*The-DESCRIPTION-file__;Iw!!Fou38LsQmgU!54yJgFhe0LVN6Sfb91X3m3HjH3zyeO6TroDujXtNKpwV4g0kwCruJ9yJaP_S$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html*The-DESCRIPTION-file__;Iw!!Fou38LsQmgU!54yJgFhe0LVN6Sfb91X3m3HjH3zyeO6TroDujXtNKpwV4g0kwCruJ9yJaP_S$>
However, if I am not currently getting an error message, then I won't worry
about it.
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
mailto:mtmorgan.b...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>; Alexey
Sergushichev mailto:alserg...@gmail.com>>
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what
precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for
package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor.
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden"
mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org%20on%20behalf%20of%20cwar...@coh.org>>
wrote:
Hi
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Thank you for your contributions to Bioconductor. We appreciate you fixing
COHCAP.
I will begin the deprecation process for sRAP; there is no further action
needed.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2020 3:53 PM
To: 'Martin Morgan' ; 'Alexey Sergushichev'
Cc: 'bioc-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Everybody,
Thank you again for your help!
I think the issue for the COHCAP devel package has now been resolved:
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/COHCAP/
I had somewhat similar error messages for sRAP (which is different than
COHCAP), but I am OK with sRAP being removed from the next version of
Bioconductor (since it is no longer being maintained). If you can please let
me know if there is a contact that I should e-mail (beyond this mailing list,
or not fixing the error), then I would appreciate that.
Thanks Again,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles Warden
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:40 PM
To: Martin Morgan ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Martin,
That is probably what happened.
Thank you again for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:38 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
yes, use 1.33.1. Maybe you had a space between the '.' and the '1' or similar,
'1.33. 1' ? This generates an error
** using staged installation
Error : Invalid DESCRIPTION file
Malformed package version.
See section 'The DESCRIPTION file' in the 'Writing R Extensions'
manual.
ERROR: installing package DESCRIPTION failed for package ...
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:28 PM, "Charles Warden" wrote:
Hi Martin,
I am currently having difficulty reproducing my earlier error (which I
think didn’t even get to the step of testing the demo code). So, I think the
short answer is that I should just use version 1.33.1.
In my search history, I can tell that I Googled "R Malformed package
version," so I think that was part of the earlier message that I got.
For what is worth, I think this is what gave me the idea to change the
version numbering system:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html*The-DESCRIPTION-file__;Iw!!Fou38LsQmgU!54yJgFhe0LVN6Sfb91X3m3HjH3zyeO6TroDujXtNKpwV4g0kwCruJ9yJaP_S$
However, if I am not currently getting an error message, then I won't worry
about it.
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what
precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for
package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor.
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden"
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue.
However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions
in R-v.4.0.0.
For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD
build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1).
I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation,
and that was OK.
However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor
branches, I get the following error message:
“Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“
Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is
only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)?
Thank You,
Charles
From: Alexey Sergushichev
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Charles Warden
Cc: Shepherd, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error
Message
I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors
option to FALSE by default.
Best,
Alexey
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote:
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much.
If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Everybody,
Thank you again for your help!
I think the issue for the COHCAP devel package has now been resolved:
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/release/bioc-LATEST/COHCAP/
I had somewhat similar error messages for sRAP (which is different than
COHCAP), but I am OK with sRAP being removed from the next version of
Bioconductor (since it is no longer being maintained). If you can please let
me know if there is a contact that I should e-mail (beyond this mailing list,
or not fixing the error), then I would appreciate that.
Thanks Again,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Charles Warden
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:40 PM
To: Martin Morgan ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: RE: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Martin,
That is probably what happened.
Thank you again for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:38 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
yes, use 1.33.1. Maybe you had a space between the '.' and the '1' or similar,
'1.33. 1' ? This generates an error
** using staged installation
Error : Invalid DESCRIPTION file
Malformed package version.
See section 'The DESCRIPTION file' in the 'Writing R Extensions'
manual.
ERROR: installing package DESCRIPTION failed for package ...
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:28 PM, "Charles Warden" wrote:
Hi Martin,
I am currently having difficulty reproducing my earlier error (which I
think didn’t even get to the step of testing the demo code). So, I think the
short answer is that I should just use version 1.33.1.
In my search history, I can tell that I Googled "R Malformed package
version," so I think that was part of the earlier message that I got.
For what is worth, I think this is what gave me the idea to change the
version numbering system:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html*The-DESCRIPTION-file__;Iw!!Fou38LsQmgU!54yJgFhe0LVN6Sfb91X3m3HjH3zyeO6TroDujXtNKpwV4g0kwCruJ9yJaP_S$
However, if I am not currently getting an error message, then I won't worry
about it.
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what
precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for
package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor.
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden"
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue.
However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions
in R-v.4.0.0.
For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD
build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1).
I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation,
and that was OK.
However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor
branches, I get the following error message:
“Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“
Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is
only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)?
Thank You,
Charles
From: Alexey Sergushichev
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Charles Warden
Cc: Shepherd, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error
Message
I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors
option to FALSE by default.
Best,
Alexey
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote:
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much.
If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error
message.
I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not
R-4.0, but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I
received error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I
contributed to).
Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might
be encountered from using R-4.0?
Thanks Again,
Charles
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Martin,
That is probably what happened.
Thank you again for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:38 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
yes, use 1.33.1. Maybe you had a space between the '.' and the '1' or similar,
'1.33. 1' ? This generates an error
** using staged installation
Error : Invalid DESCRIPTION file
Malformed package version.
See section 'The DESCRIPTION file' in the 'Writing R Extensions'
manual.
ERROR: installing package DESCRIPTION failed for package ...
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:28 PM, "Charles Warden" wrote:
Hi Martin,
I am currently having difficulty reproducing my earlier error (which I
think didn’t even get to the step of testing the demo code). So, I think the
short answer is that I should just use version 1.33.1.
In my search history, I can tell that I Googled "R Malformed package
version," so I think that was part of the earlier message that I got.
For what is worth, I think this is what gave me the idea to change the
version numbering system:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html*The-DESCRIPTION-file__;Iw!!Fou38LsQmgU!54yJgFhe0LVN6Sfb91X3m3HjH3zyeO6TroDujXtNKpwV4g0kwCruJ9yJaP_S$
However, if I am not currently getting an error message, then I won't worry
about it.
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what
precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for
package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor.
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden"
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue.
However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions
in R-v.4.0.0.
For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD
build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1).
I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation,
and that was OK.
However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor
branches, I get the following error message:
“Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“
Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is
only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)?
Thank You,
Charles
From: Alexey Sergushichev
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Charles Warden
Cc: Shepherd, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error
Message
I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors
option to FALSE by default.
Best,
Alexey
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote:
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much.
If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error
message.
I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not
R-4.0, but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I
received error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I
contributed to).
Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might
be encountered from using R-4.0?
Thanks Again,
Charles
From: Shepherd, Lori
[mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:41 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>; Charles
Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Yes that is the correct version of R to use. Thank you for taking the
time to make sure everything is correct to debug. We appreciate your effort and
contributors to bioconductor.
Get Outlook for
Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/ghei36__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVns3uz4qi$>
From: Charles Warden
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
yes, use 1.33.1. Maybe you had a space between the '.' and the '1' or similar,
'1.33. 1' ? This generates an error
** using staged installation
Error : Invalid DESCRIPTION file
Malformed package version.
See section 'The DESCRIPTION file' in the 'Writing R Extensions'
manual.
ERROR: installing package DESCRIPTION failed for package ...
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:28 PM, "Charles Warden" wrote:
Hi Martin,
I am currently having difficulty reproducing my earlier error (which I
think didn’t even get to the step of testing the demo code). So, I think the
short answer is that I should just use version 1.33.1.
In my search history, I can tell that I Googled "R Malformed package
version," so I think that was part of the earlier message that I got.
For what is worth, I think this is what gave me the idea to change the
version numbering system:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#The-DESCRIPTION-file
However, if I am not currently getting an error message, then I won't worry
about it.
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what
precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for
package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor.
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden"
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue.
However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions
in R-v.4.0.0.
For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD
build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1).
I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation,
and that was OK.
However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor
branches, I get the following error message:
“Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“
Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is
only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)?
Thank You,
Charles
From: Alexey Sergushichev
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Charles Warden
Cc: Shepherd, Lori ;
bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error
Message
I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors
option to FALSE by default.
Best,
Alexey
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote:
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much.
If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error
message.
I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not
R-4.0, but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I
received error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I
contributed to).
Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might
be encountered from using R-4.0?
Thanks Again,
Charles
From: Shepherd, Lori
[mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:41 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>; Charles
Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Yes that is the correct version of R to use. Thank you for taking the
time to make sure everything is correct to debug. We appreciate your effort and
contributors to bioconductor.
Get Outlook for
Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/ghei36__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVns3uz4qi$>
From: Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 4:37:52 PM
To: Shepherd, Lori
mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>>>;
bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.or
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Martin,
I am currently having difficulty reproducing my earlier error (which I think
didn’t even get to the step of testing the demo code). So, I think the short
answer is that I should just use version 1.33.1.
In my search history, I can tell that I Googled "R Malformed package version,"
so I think that was part of the earlier message that I got.
For what is worth, I think this is what gave me the idea to change the version
numbering system:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#The-DESCRIPTION-file
However, if I am not currently getting an error message, then I won't worry
about it.
Thank you very much for your help!
Sincerely,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Martin Morgan
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 1:09 PM
To: Charles Warden ; Alexey Sergushichev
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what
precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for
package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor.
Martin
On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden"
wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue.
However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions in
R-v.4.0.0.
For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD
build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1).
I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation, and
that was OK.
However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor branches,
I get the following error message:
“Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“
Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is
only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)?
Thank You,
Charles
From: Alexey Sergushichev
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM
To: Charles Warden
Cc: Shepherd, Lori ; bioc-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors
option to FALSE by default.
Best,
Alexey
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote:
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much.
If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error message.
I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not R-4.0,
but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I received
error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I contributed
to).
Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might be
encountered from using R-4.0?
Thanks Again,
Charles
From: Shepherd, Lori
[mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>]
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:41 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>; Charles
Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Yes that is the correct version of R to use. Thank you for taking the time
to make sure everything is correct to debug. We appreciate your effort and
contributors to bioconductor.
Get Outlook for
Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/ghei36__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVns3uz4qi$>
From: Charles Warden
mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 4:37:52 PM
To: Shepherd, Lori
mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>>>;
bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>>
Subject: RE: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Lori,
Thank you very much for your response.
I was testing building the Bioconductor development branch, but I was using
R-3.6.
On the Ubuntu server where I have all the necessary dependencies
configured, I tested compiling R-devel but it didn't exactly say R-4.0.
So, in order to see if I can reproduce the error, I want to make sure I am
using the same version of R:
On the R website, it says "R version 4.0.0 (Arbor Day) prerelease
versions<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/cran.r
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Can you be precise about the concern about 1.33.1 as a version number (what precise note / error / warning you received)? This scheme is very standard for package versions, and as you see enforced (for many years!) by Bioconductor. Martin On 3/20/20, 4:03 PM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden" wrote: Hi Everybody, I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue. However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions in R-v.4.0.0. For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1). I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation, and that was OK. However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor branches, I get the following error message: “Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“ Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)? Thank You, Charles From: Alexey Sergushichev Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM To: Charles Warden Cc: Shepherd, Lori ; bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors option to FALSE by default. Best, Alexey On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote: Hi Lori, Thank you very much. If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error message. I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not R-4.0, but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I received error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I contributed to). Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might be encountered from using R-4.0? Thanks Again, Charles From: Shepherd, Lori [mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:41 PM To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>; Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message Yes that is the correct version of R to use. Thank you for taking the time to make sure everything is correct to debug. We appreciate your effort and contributors to bioconductor. Get Outlook for Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/ghei36__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVns3uz4qi$> From: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 4:37:52 PM To: Shepherd, Lori mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>>>; bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>> Subject: RE: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message Hi Lori, Thank you very much for your response. I was testing building the Bioconductor development branch, but I was using R-3.6. On the Ubuntu server where I have all the necessary dependencies configured, I tested compiling R-devel but it didn't exactly say R-4.0. So, in order to see if I can reproduce the error, I want to make sure I am using the same version of R: On the R website, it says "R version 4.0.0 (Arbor Day) prerelease versions<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVnoU6OsCs$> will appear starting Tuesday 2020-03-24. Final release is scheduled for Friday 2020-04-24.", but I can download prerelease files from the following page: https://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!-WIu-p4CrVw9hrXAGnmplvErU_cHTC8qgc8HQFuD1PD7ecyltJjSSaed1B9J$><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVng8C2GTW$> I tested compiling the R-devel.tar.gz file. I think that completed without errors, but the version of R is reported as "R Under development (unstable) (2020-03-18 r78002)". So, I am not sure if this is correct. Is
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Everybody, I think changing that read.table() parameter fixed the main issue. However, when I tested my code, R used a different way to note versions in R-v.4.0.0. For example, in order to clear a message from “R CMD check” or “R CMD build”, I had to say the version was 1.33-1 (instead of 1.33.1). I uploaded those changes to GitHub and tested an R-3.6 installation, and that was OK. However, when I am working on merging the GitHub and Bioconductor branches, I get the following error message: “Remote: Error: Illegal version bump from ‘1.33.0’ to ‘1.33-1’“ Is this going to be changed in Bioconductor, or should I see if this is only a NOTE or WARNING (and submit the package as version 1.33.1)? Thank You, Charles From: Alexey Sergushichev Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM To: Charles Warden Cc: Shepherd, Lori ; bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors option to FALSE by default. Best, Alexey On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote: Hi Lori, Thank you very much. If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error message. I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not R-4.0, but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I received error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I contributed to). Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might be encountered from using R-4.0? Thanks Again, Charles From: Shepherd, Lori [mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:41 PM To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>; Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message Yes that is the correct version of R to use. Thank you for taking the time to make sure everything is correct to debug. We appreciate your effort and contributors to bioconductor. Get Outlook for Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/ghei36__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVns3uz4qi$> From: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 4:37:52 PM To: Shepherd, Lori mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>>>; bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>> Subject: RE: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message Hi Lori, Thank you very much for your response. I was testing building the Bioconductor development branch, but I was using R-3.6. On the Ubuntu server where I have all the necessary dependencies configured, I tested compiling R-devel but it didn't exactly say R-4.0. So, in order to see if I can reproduce the error, I want to make sure I am using the same version of R: On the R website, it says "R version 4.0.0 (Arbor Day) prerelease versions<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVnoU6OsCs$> will appear starting Tuesday 2020-03-24. Final release is scheduled for Friday 2020-04-24.", but I can download prerelease files from the following page: https://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!-WIu-p4CrVw9hrXAGnmplvErU_cHTC8qgc8HQFuD1PD7ecyltJjSSaed1B9J$><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVng8C2GTW$> I tested compiling the R-devel.tar.gz file. I think that completed without errors, but the version of R is reported as "R Under development (unstable) (2020-03-18 r78002)". So, I am not sure if this is correct. Is this the correct version of R to try and reproduce the error on my own computer? If not, can you please describe which file I should be using? I would like to install this separately from R 3.6 (in case the version of R affects other packages as well). Thank You, Charles From: Shepherd, Lori [mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 10:48 AM To: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>>; bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> Subje
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi Alexey, Thank you very much – I will look into that. It does look like at least 1 demo dataset is being read incorrectly. Sincerely, Charles From: Alexey Sergushichev [mailto:alserg...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 3:00 PM To: Charles Warden Cc: Shepherd, Lori ; bioc-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message I think one of the major changes recently is setting stringsAsFactors option to FALSE by default. Best, Alexey On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:48 AM Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> wrote: Hi Lori, Thank you very much. If I use R-4.0 (instead of R-3.6), then I can reproduce the error message. I will work in figuring out why the code works with R-3.6 but not R-4.0, but it seems like this might affect other packages as well (since I received error messages for 2 out of 2 of the Bioconductor packages that I contributed to). Do you have any general suggestions of what types of new errors might be encountered from using R-4.0? Thanks Again, Charles From: Shepherd, Lori [mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:41 PM To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>; Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>> Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message Yes that is the correct version of R to use. Thank you for taking the time to make sure everything is correct to debug. We appreciate your effort and contributors to bioconductor. Get Outlook for Android<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/aka.ms/ghei36__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVns3uz4qi$> From: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 4:37:52 PM To: Shepherd, Lori mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>>>; bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>> Subject: RE: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message Hi Lori, Thank you very much for your response. I was testing building the Bioconductor development branch, but I was using R-3.6. On the Ubuntu server where I have all the necessary dependencies configured, I tested compiling R-devel but it didn't exactly say R-4.0. So, in order to see if I can reproduce the error, I want to make sure I am using the same version of R: On the R website, it says "R version 4.0.0 (Arbor Day) prerelease versions<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVnoU6OsCs$> will appear starting Tuesday 2020-03-24. Final release is scheduled for Friday 2020-04-24.", but I can download prerelease files from the following page: https://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!-WIu-p4CrVw9hrXAGnmplvErU_cHTC8qgc8HQFuD1PD7ecyltJjSSaed1B9J$><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!5kLQzxLFDLkE15tideOn6Lfj4ouKaT1CB36y5FZreJ7HHHtZgHjVng8C2GTW$> I tested compiling the R-devel.tar.gz file. I think that completed without errors, but the version of R is reported as "R Under development (unstable) (2020-03-18 r78002)". So, I am not sure if this is correct. Is this the correct version of R to try and reproduce the error on my own computer? If not, can you please describe which file I should be using? I would like to install this separately from R 3.6 (in case the version of R affects other packages as well). Thank You, Charles From: Shepherd, Lori [mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org<mailto:lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org>] Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 10:48 AM To: Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org><mailto:cwar...@coh.org<mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>>; bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org><mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>> Subject: Re: Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message It is not okay to ignore the emails you are getting. You need to investigate to find out if the ERROR is from your package or a package you depend on. While you have not made changes to the package, R has made a lot of changes to its base code that have broken a lot of packages. Most of the changes are being documented here http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/troubleshoot-build-report/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/troubleshoot-build-re
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
u38LsQmgU!4jcx-leaLxfL2BEkbrsoQOxva2TZNrP3V15LcW-qR2EyDhkfpykALF7NFkcT$
> >
>
>
>
> I can reproduce this locally on my computer. You will need to be using R
> 4.0 and Bioc 3.11 version of packages.
>
>
>
> I ran R CMD Sweave COHCAP.Rnw to produce the R code in COHCAP.R
>
>
>
>
>
> > library(COHCAP)
>
> Loading required package: WriteXLS
>
> Loading required package: COHCAPanno
>
> Loading required package: RColorBrewer
>
> Loading required package: gplots
>
>
>
> Attaching package: 'gplots'
>
>
>
> The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
>
>
>
> lowess
>
>
>
> > source("COHCAP.R", echo=TRUE)
>
>
>
> > ### R code from vignette source
> '/home/lori/b/Rpacks/COHCAP/vignettes/COHCAP.Rnw'
>
> >
>
> > ###
>
> > ### cod [TRUNCATED]
>
>
>
> > dir = system.file("extdata", package="COHCAP")
>
>
>
> > beta.file = file.path(dir,"GSE42308_truncated.txt")
>
>
>
> > sample.file = file.path(dir,"sample_GSE42308.txt")
>
>
>
> > expression.file =
> file.path(dir,"expression-Average_by_Island_truncated.txt")
>
>
>
> > project.folder = getwd()
>
>
>
> > project.name = "450k_avg_by_island_test"
>
>
>
> > ###
>
> > ### code chunk number 2: annotation
>
> > ###
>
> > be [TRUNCATED]
>
> [1] 173 7
>
> [1] 172 5
>
> [1] 172 11
>
>
>
> > ###
>
> > ### code chunk number 3: site
>
> > ###
>
> > filtered [TRUNCATED]
>
> [1] "Reading Sample Description File"
>
> [1] 172 6
>
> [1] 172 6
>
> [1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
>
> [1] 172 5
>
> [1] 172 10
>
>
>
> [1] 172 10
>
> [1] 34 10
>
> [1] 34 10
>
>
>
> > ###
>
> > ### code chunk number 4: island
>
> > ###
>
> > island [TRUNCATED]
>
> [1] "Reading Sample Description File"
>
> [1] 172 6
>
> [1] 172 6
>
> [1] "Group: mutant" "Group: parental"
>
> [1] "Checking CpG Site Stats Table"
>
> [1] 34 10
>
> [1] 29 10
>
> [1] 5
>
> [1] "Average CpG Sites per CpG Island"
>
> [1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
>
> [1] 4 8
>
> [1] 4 8
>
> [1] "There are 4 differentially methylated islands"
>
> [1] 4 8
>
> [1] 4 8
>
> [1] "Plotting Significant Islands Box-Plots.."
>
>
>
> > ###
>
> > ### code chunk number 5: integrate
>
> > ###
>
> > COH [TRUNCATED]
>
> [1] 4 8
>
> [1] 4 8
>
>
>
> [1] 4
>
> [1] 1.777472e-06 1.706586e-06 2.418011e-06 2.014309e-07
>
> [1] 4
>
> [1] 4
>
> [1] "4 significant correlations"
>
> [1] "Plotting Correlated Genes"
>
> [1] 4 14
>
> Error in plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : invalid color name 'parental'
>
>
>
>
>
> > traceback()
>
> 8: plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
>
> 7: plot.default(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main =
> paste(gene,
>
>" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
>
>digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
> na.rm)$estimate,
>
>digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
>
> 6: plot(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
>
> " (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
>
>digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
> na.rm)$estimate,
>
>digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
>
> 5: COHCAP.integrate.avg.by.island(island.list, project.name,
> project.folder,
>
>expression.file, sample.file) at COHCAP.R#40
>
> 4: eval(ei, envir)
>
> 3: eval(ei, envir)
>
> 2: withVisible(eval(ei, envir))
>
> 1: source("COHCAP.R", echo = TRUE)
>
>
>
>
>
> It is your job as a maintainer to try and reproduce and f
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
package: WriteXLS
Loading required package: COHCAPanno
Loading required package: RColorBrewer
Loading required package: gplots
Attaching package: 'gplots'
The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
lowess
> source("COHCAP.R", echo=TRUE)
> ### R code from vignette source
> '/home/lori/b/Rpacks/COHCAP/vignettes/COHCAP.Rnw'
>
> ###
> ### cod [TRUNCATED]
> dir = system.file("extdata", package="COHCAP")
> beta.file = file.path(dir,"GSE42308_truncated.txt")
> sample.file = file.path(dir,"sample_GSE42308.txt")
> expression.file = file.path(dir,"expression-Average_by_Island_truncated.txt")
> project.folder = getwd()
> project.name = "450k_avg_by_island_test"
> ###
> ### code chunk number 2: annotation
> ###
> be [TRUNCATED]
[1] 173 7
[1] 172 5
[1] 172 11
> ###
> ### code chunk number 3: site
> ###
> filtered [TRUNCATED]
[1] "Reading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 172 5
[1] 172 10
[1] 172 10
[1] 34 10
[1] 34 10
> ###
> ### code chunk number 4: island
> ###
> island [TRUNCATED]
[1] "Reading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Group: mutant" "Group: parental"
[1] "Checking CpG Site Stats Table"
[1] 34 10
[1] 29 10
[1] 5
[1] "Average CpG Sites per CpG Island"
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "There are 4 differentially methylated islands"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "Plotting Significant Islands Box-Plots.."
> ###
> ### code chunk number 5: integrate
> ###
> COH [TRUNCATED]
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] 4
[1] 1.777472e-06 1.706586e-06 2.418011e-06 2.014309e-07
[1] 4
[1] 4
[1] "4 significant correlations"
[1] "Plotting Correlated Genes"
[1] 4 14
Error in plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : invalid color name 'parental'
> traceback()
8: plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
7: plot.default(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
6: plot(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
5: COHCAP.integrate.avg.by.island(island.list, project.name, project.folder,
expression.file, sample.file) at COHCAP.R#40
4: eval(ei, envir)
3: eval(ei, envir)
2: withVisible(eval(ei, envir))
1: source("COHCAP.R", echo = TRUE)
It is your job as a maintainer to try and reproduce and fix this ERROR.
If you continue having trouble or feel like the package is failing because of
one of your dependencies please respond back here for follow up discussion or
comments. Please do not assume it comes from a dependency without investigating.
Hope this helps get you started.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel
mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on
behalf of Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:36 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi,
I recently received error messages for 2 packages. As a worst-case-scenario,
it is acceptable if the sRAP package had to be removed. However, I need to
resolve the issue for the COHCAP package.
This is odd because I don�t think I have updated either package in the last
year or so. In fact, if I check the CHANGES file in the COHCAP package, the
last change I manually noted was v1.29.3, which I can see was added to the
GitHub version of the code on 3/2/2019:
https://github.com/cward
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
##
> ### cod [TRUNCATED]
> dir = system.file("extdata", package="COHCAP")
> beta.file = file.path(dir,"GSE42308_truncated.txt")
> sample.file = file.path(dir,"sample_GSE42308.txt")
> expression.file = file.path(dir,"expression-Average_by_Island_truncated.txt")
> project.folder = getwd()
> project.name = "450k_avg_by_island_test"
> ###
> ### code chunk number 2: annotation
> ###
> be [TRUNCATED]
[1] 173 7
[1] 172 5
[1] 172 11
> ###
> ### code chunk number 3: site
> ###
> filtered [TRUNCATED]
[1] "Reading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 172 5
[1] 172 10
[1] 172 10
[1] 34 10
[1] 34 10
> ###
> ### code chunk number 4: island
> ###
> island [TRUNCATED]
[1] "Reading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Group: mutant" "Group: parental"
[1] "Checking CpG Site Stats Table"
[1] 34 10
[1] 29 10
[1] 5
[1] "Average CpG Sites per CpG Island"
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "There are 4 differentially methylated islands"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "Plotting Significant Islands Box-Plots.."
> ###
> ### code chunk number 5: integrate
> ###
> COH [TRUNCATED]
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] 4
[1] 1.777472e-06 1.706586e-06 2.418011e-06 2.014309e-07
[1] 4
[1] 4
[1] "4 significant correlations"
[1] "Plotting Correlated Genes"
[1] 4 14
Error in plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : invalid color name 'parental'
> traceback()
8: plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
7: plot.default(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
6: plot(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
5: COHCAP.integrate.avg.by.island(island.list, project.name, project.folder,
expression.file, sample.file) at COHCAP.R#40
4: eval(ei, envir)
3: eval(ei, envir)
2: withVisible(eval(ei, envir))
1: source("COHCAP.R", echo = TRUE)
It is your job as a maintainer to try and reproduce and fix this ERROR.
If you continue having trouble or feel like the package is failing because of
one of your dependencies please respond back here for follow up discussion or
comments. Please do not assume it comes from a dependency without investigating.
Hope this helps get you started.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel
mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on
behalf of Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:36 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi,
I recently received error messages for 2 packages. As a worst-case-scenario,
it is acceptable if the sRAP package had to be removed. However, I need to
resolve the issue for the COHCAP package.
This is odd because I don't think I have updated either package in the last
year or so. In fact, if I check the CHANGES file in the COHCAP package, the
last change I manually noted was v1.29.3, which I can see was added to the
GitHub version of the code on 3/2/2019:
https://github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!4jcx-leaLxfL2BEkbrsoQOxva2TZNrP3V15LcW-qR2EyDhkfpykALNsjGd0E$>
I can successfully install the package, with either the GitHub or Bioconductor
instructions. However, I want to correct the error because I don't want the
Bioconductor package t
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
eading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Group: mutant" "Group: parental"
[1] "Checking CpG Site Stats Table"
[1] 34 10
[1] 29 10
[1] 5
[1] "Average CpG Sites per CpG Island"
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "There are 4 differentially methylated islands"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "Plotting Significant Islands Box-Plots.."
> ###
> ### code chunk number 5: integrate
> ###
> COH [TRUNCATED]
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] 4
[1] 1.777472e-06 1.706586e-06 2.418011e-06 2.014309e-07
[1] 4
[1] 4
[1] "4 significant correlations"
[1] "Plotting Correlated Genes"
[1] 4 14
Error in plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : invalid color name 'parental'
> traceback()
8: plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
7: plot.default(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
6: plot(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
5: COHCAP.integrate.avg.by.island(island.list, project.name, project.folder,
expression.file, sample.file) at COHCAP.R#40
4: eval(ei, envir)
3: eval(ei, envir)
2: withVisible(eval(ei, envir))
1: source("COHCAP.R", echo = TRUE)
It is your job as a maintainer to try and reproduce and fix this ERROR.
If you continue having trouble or feel like the package is failing because of
one of your dependencies please respond back here for follow up discussion or
comments. Please do not assume it comes from a dependency without investigating.
Hope this helps get you started.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel
mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on
behalf of Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:36 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi,
I recently received error messages for 2 packages. As a worst-case-scenario,
it is acceptable if the sRAP package had to be removed. However, I need to
resolve the issue for the COHCAP package.
This is odd because I don�t think I have updated either package in the last
year or so. In fact, if I check the CHANGES file in the COHCAP package, the
last change I manually noted was v1.29.3, which I can see was added to the
GitHub version of the code on 3/2/2019:
https://github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!4jcx-leaLxfL2BEkbrsoQOxva2TZNrP3V15LcW-qR2EyDhkfpykALNsjGd0E$>
I can successfully install the package, with either the GitHub or Bioconductor
instructions. However, I want to correct the error because I don�t want the
Bioconductor package to be removed.
I had some dependency issues on some systems related to the PDF generation
(which I would usually ignore). However, if I run �R CMD build� on an Ubuntu
system where I have all dependencies installed, I don�t get any error message:
$ R CMD build COHCAP
* checking for file �COHCAP/DESCRIPTION� ... OK
* preparing �COHCAP�:
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* cleaning src
* installing the package to build vignettes
* creating vignettes ... OK
Warning: �inst/doc� files
�COHCAP.Rnw�, �COHCAP.pdf�, �COHCAP.R�
ignored as vignettes have been rebuilt.
Run R CMD build with --no-build-vignettes to prevent rebuilding.
* cleaning src
* checking for LF line-endings in source and make files and shell scripts
* checking for empty or unneeded directories
* building �COHCAP_1.33.0.tar.gz�
I am using the development version, which I thought should match what was being
tested for the BioC 3.11 error message.
Can you please either tell me what I need to do to reproduce (and then correct)
this error, or confirm that it is OK to ignore the e-mails that I have received
recently?
Thank You,
Charles
Charles Warden, Bioinformatics Specialist
Integrative Genomics Core
City of Hope National Medical Center
Shamrock Monrovia Building (655 Huntington Dr, Monrovia, CA,
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
> ### code chunk number 5: integrate
> ###
> COH [TRUNCATED]
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] 4
[1] 1.777472e-06 1.706586e-06 2.418011e-06 2.014309e-07
[1] 4
[1] 4
[1] "4 significant correlations"
[1] "Plotting Correlated Genes"
[1] 4 14
Error in plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : invalid color name 'parental'
> traceback()
8: plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
7: plot.default(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
6: plot(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
5: COHCAP.integrate.avg.by.island(island.list, project.name, project.folder,
expression.file, sample.file) at COHCAP.R#40
4: eval(ei, envir)
3: eval(ei, envir)
2: withVisible(eval(ei, envir))
1: source("COHCAP.R", echo = TRUE)
It is your job as a maintainer to try and reproduce and fix this ERROR.
If you continue having trouble or feel like the package is failing because of
one of your dependencies please respond back here for follow up discussion or
comments. Please do not assume it comes from a dependency without investigating.
Hope this helps get you started.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel
mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org>> on
behalf of Charles Warden mailto:cwar...@coh.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 1:36 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org<mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>
mailto:bioc-devel@r-project.org>>
Subject: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi,
I recently received error messages for 2 packages. As a worst-case-scenario,
it is acceptable if the sRAP package had to be removed. However, I need to
resolve the issue for the COHCAP package.
This is odd because I don't think I have updated either package in the last
year or so. In fact, if I check the CHANGES file in the COHCAP package, the
last change I manually noted was v1.29.3, which I can see was added to the
GitHub version of the code on 3/2/2019:
https://github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES__;!!Fou38LsQmgU!4jcx-leaLxfL2BEkbrsoQOxva2TZNrP3V15LcW-qR2EyDhkfpykALNsjGd0E$>
I can successfully install the package, with either the GitHub or Bioconductor
instructions. However, I want to correct the error because I don't want the
Bioconductor package to be removed.
I had some dependency issues on some systems related to the PDF generation
(which I would usually ignore). However, if I run "R CMD build" on an Ubuntu
system where I have all dependencies installed, I don't get any error message:
$ R CMD build COHCAP
* checking for file 'COHCAP/DESCRIPTION' ... OK
* preparing 'COHCAP':
* checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK
* cleaning src
* installing the package to build vignettes
* creating vignettes ... OK
Warning: 'inst/doc' files
'COHCAP.Rnw', 'COHCAP.pdf', 'COHCAP.R'
ignored as vignettes have been rebuilt.
Run R CMD build with --no-build-vignettes to prevent rebuilding.
* cleaning src
* checking for LF line-endings in source and make files and shell scripts
* checking for empty or unneeded directories
* building 'COHCAP_1.33.0.tar.gz'
I am using the development version, which I thought should match what was being
tested for the BioC 3.11 error message.
Can you please either tell me what I need to do to reproduce (and then correct)
this error, or confirm that it is OK to ignore the e-mails that I have received
recently?
Thank You,
Charles
Charles Warden, Bioinformatics Specialist
Integrative Genomics Core
City of Hope National Medical Center
Shamrock Monrovia Building (655 Huntington Dr, Monrovia, CA, 91016)
Room 1086
Internal Ext: 80375 | Direct: 626-218-0375
Work-From-Home Cell: 404-316-0012
--
-SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING-
This message and any attachments are intended solely for the individual or
entity to which they are addressed. This communication may contain information
that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable
law (e.g., personal health information, research data, financial i
Re: [Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
It is not okay to ignore the emails you are getting. You need to investigate
to find out if the ERROR is from your package or a package you depend on.
While you have not made changes to the package, R has made a lot of changes to
its base code that have broken a lot of packages. Most of the changes are
being documented here
http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/troubleshoot-build-report/
Please remember that your github version of the repo is different than our
bioconductor git.bioconductor.org server.
http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/
http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/sync-existing-repositories/
I can reproduce this locally on my computer. You will need to be using R 4.0
and Bioc 3.11 version of packages.
I ran R CMD Sweave COHCAP.Rnw to produce the R code in COHCAP.R
> library(COHCAP)
Loading required package: WriteXLS
Loading required package: COHCAPanno
Loading required package: RColorBrewer
Loading required package: gplots
Attaching package: 'gplots'
The following object is masked from 'package:stats':
lowess
> source("COHCAP.R", echo=TRUE)
> ### R code from vignette source
> '/home/lori/b/Rpacks/COHCAP/vignettes/COHCAP.Rnw'
>
> ###
> ### cod [TRUNCATED]
> dir = system.file("extdata", package="COHCAP")
> beta.file = file.path(dir,"GSE42308_truncated.txt")
> sample.file = file.path(dir,"sample_GSE42308.txt")
> expression.file = file.path(dir,"expression-Average_by_Island_truncated.txt")
> project.folder = getwd()
> project.name = "450k_avg_by_island_test"
> ###
> ### code chunk number 2: annotation
> ###
> be [TRUNCATED]
[1] 173 7
[1] 172 5
[1] 172 11
> ###
> ### code chunk number 3: site
> ###
> filtered [TRUNCATED]
[1] "Reading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 172 5
[1] 172 10
[1] 172 10
[1] 34 10
[1] 34 10
> ###
> ### code chunk number 4: island
> ###
> island [TRUNCATED]
[1] "Reading Sample Description File"
[1] 172 6
[1] 172 6
[1] "Group: mutant" "Group: parental"
[1] "Checking CpG Site Stats Table"
[1] 34 10
[1] 29 10
[1] 5
[1] "Average CpG Sites per CpG Island"
[1] "Differential Methylation Stats for 2 Groups with Reference"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "There are 4 differentially methylated islands"
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] "Plotting Significant Islands Box-Plots.."
> ###
> ### code chunk number 5: integrate
> ###
> COH [TRUNCATED]
[1] 4 8
[1] 4 8
[1] 4
[1] 1.777472e-06 1.706586e-06 2.418011e-06 2.014309e-07
[1] 4
[1] 4
[1] "4 significant correlations"
[1] "Plotting Correlated Genes"
[1] 4 14
Error in plot.xy(xy, type, ...) : invalid color name 'parental'
> traceback()
8: plot.xy(xy, type, ...)
7: plot.default(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
6: plot(expr, methyl, pch = 20, col = labelColors, main = paste(gene,
" (p=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action = na.rm)$p.value,
digits = 2), " ,r=", round(cor.test(expr, methyl, na.action =
na.rm)$estimate,
digits = 2), ")", sep = ""))
5: COHCAP.integrate.avg.by.island(island.list, project.name, project.folder,
expression.file, sample.file) at COHCAP.R#40
4: eval(ei, envir)
3: eval(ei, envir)
2: withVisible(eval(ei, envir))
1: source("COHCAP.R", echo = TRUE)
It is your job as a maintainer to try and reproduce and fix this ERROR.
If you continue having trouble or feel like the package is failing because of
one of your dependencies please respond back here for follow up discussion or
comments. Please do not assume it comes from a dependency without investigating.
Hope this helps get you started.
Cheers,
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core Team
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
Elm & Carlton Streets
Buffalo, New York 14263
From: Bioc-devel on behalf of Charles Warden
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020
[Bioc-devel] Issue Reproducing BioC 3.11 COHCAP Error Message
Hi, I recently received error messages for 2 packages. As a worst-case-scenario, it is acceptable if the sRAP package had to be removed. However, I need to resolve the issue for the COHCAP package. This is odd because I don’t think I have updated either package in the last year or so. In fact, if I check the CHANGES file in the COHCAP package, the last change I manually noted was v1.29.3, which I can see was added to the GitHub version of the code on 3/2/2019: https://github.com/cwarden45/COHCAP/commits/master/CHANGES I can successfully install the package, with either the GitHub or Bioconductor instructions. However, I want to correct the error because I don’t want the Bioconductor package to be removed. I had some dependency issues on some systems related to the PDF generation (which I would usually ignore). However, if I run “R CMD build” on an Ubuntu system where I have all dependencies installed, I don’t get any error message: $ R CMD build COHCAP * checking for file ‘COHCAP/DESCRIPTION’ ... OK * preparing ‘COHCAP’: * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... OK * cleaning src * installing the package to build vignettes * creating vignettes ... OK Warning: ‘inst/doc’ files ‘COHCAP.Rnw’, ‘COHCAP.pdf’, ‘COHCAP.R’ ignored as vignettes have been rebuilt. Run R CMD build with --no-build-vignettes to prevent rebuilding. * cleaning src * checking for LF line-endings in source and make files and shell scripts * checking for empty or unneeded directories * building ‘COHCAP_1.33.0.tar.gz’ I am using the development version, which I thought should match what was being tested for the BioC 3.11 error message. Can you please either tell me what I need to do to reproduce (and then correct) this error, or confirm that it is OK to ignore the e-mails that I have received recently? Thank You, Charles Charles Warden, Bioinformatics Specialist Integrative Genomics Core City of Hope National Medical Center Shamrock Monrovia Building (655 Huntington Dr, Monrovia, CA, 91016) Room 1086 Internal Ext: 80375 | Direct: 626-218-0375 Work-From-Home Cell: 404-316-0012 -- -SECURITY/CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING- This message and any attachments are intended solely for the individual or entity to which they are addressed. This communication may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable law (e.g., personal health information, research data, financial information). Because this e-mail has been sent without encryption, individuals other than the intended recipient may be able to view the information, forward it to others or tamper with the information without the knowledge or consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is strictly prohibited. If you received the communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting the message and any accompanying files from your system. If, due to the security risks, you do not wish to receive further communications via e-mail, please reply to this message and inform the sender that you do not wish to receive further e-mail from the sender. (LCP301) [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
