Thanks Martin. I've already been working on the new version as a separate
package, although branched from the previous code base because I was
planning on merging it back in.
After some thought, I do think the best way to do it will be to deprecate
the original package, including the name of the
Thanks for the feedback Wolfgang. I never thought to look at how many
packages in Bioconductor have a baseName and baseName2 to see how often
this is done. I assume based on the existence of Roxygen2 and ggplot2 that
there were initial versions of those named Roxygen and ggplot.
This also seems
On 05/28/2015 06:32 AM, Robert M. Flight wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Wolfgang. I never thought to look at how many
packages in Bioconductor have a baseName and baseName2 to see how often
this is done. I assume based on the existence of Roxygen2 and ggplot2 that
there were initial versions of
I am the author and maintainer of the categoryCompare package on
Bioconductor. As I and others have used it over the years, I am seeing that
there are a lot of design mistakes in the code, and that it was not
extensible in it's current form. Therefore, I decided to do a complete
rewrite starting
Robert
with the packages cellHTS, cellHTS2 and DESeq, DESeq2 (and with the functions
vsn, vsn2 in the vsn package) I three times chose route 1, and am generally
happy about it. In due time, you can deprecate and then defunct the old one.
Option 2 seems needlessly disruptive (potentially). A
