Re: [Biohaskell] better data definitions in biocore

2011-09-08 Thread Ketil Malde
Ketil Malde writes: > Pushed 0.1 to http://malde.org:~ketil/biohaskell/biocore - feel free to > have a look. Unless there are objections, I'm going to call this final, and push it to hackage. Objections? Well, I have a small one, regarding the Strand data type. Christian suggested that newtyp

Re: [Biohaskell] better data definitions in biocore

2011-09-08 Thread Christian Höner zu Siederdissen
Hi, sorry for being lazy in answering. Feel free to take the "Boolean" approach with data Strand, instead of a newtype. As sequences are lazy bytestrings, the performance objections are not valid here, anyways. Looking forward to the push. Gruss, Christian * Ketil Malde [08.09.2011 14:15]: > K