On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:40:18PM -0500, Simon Foote wrote:
> I've been messing with the BioSQL implementation and have found a couple
> of bugs. Both are the result of the term_name in the ontology_term
> table being a fixed length char (255).
>
> 1) The feature.byType() method gives the 25
I've been messing with the BioSQL implementation and have found a couple
of bugs. Both are the result of the term_name in the ontology_term
table being a fixed length char (255).
1) The feature.byType() method gives the 255 char string, thus if you
want to filter by, for example "cds", it fa
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Guoneng Zhong wrote:
> Hi,
> Broad question. Is there a way using bioperl mods that I can see what a
> gene, like, say, CDK5, does? Perhaps an interface to the GO database?
>
You might be better off asking on the bioperl lists about their mods.
Just off the top of my head
Hi,
Broad question. Is there a way using bioperl mods that I can see what a
gene, like, say, CDK5, does? Perhaps an interface to the GO database?
G
___
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
This is an outline/overview for a LIMS/Workflow framework project. If
it sounds like the sort of thing that you're interested in using or
(better yet) helping with, please let me know. Most of the design and
some of the implementation are done and it's at the point where it can
almost be usefu
Keith James wrote:
>LOTS of stuff deletet to keep traffic volume down.
>
I think this is a very good idea. I can only see benefits an no real
disadvantages.
___
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:09:21AM -0500, Guoneng Zhong wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I noticed that in the cvs tree I downloaded there are two src dirs; one
> with a 1.4 attached to it. What is that? And which should I be working
> on? Is this 1.4 the jdk 1.4 or the next release of biojava?
>
>
