Re: Wrong BGP NH metric

Fine then! I was suspicious about some changes in thread-next (where this problem can be actually reproduced with a good probability) and now I know that I should assess the whole algorithm instead. Thanks a lot! Maria On October 7, 2022 11:29:09 AM UTC, Mihai wrote: >Hi Maria, > >Yes you are

Re: BIRD 3.0-alpha0

Hello! As there are some merges done, here is a short update. >3G. the current route attribute implementation is a two-layer mess originating >in version 1 where everything was an IP route, let's squash these into one >layer [IN PROGRESS] Done (at least for now), will also comment the

Re: RFC: Upgrade filter integer size to 64-bit

Hello! I'm curious as well and I'd like to ask you also, if you could, to send me (privately) a binary and a corefile of such a case you are writing about. I'll inspect the memory and tell exactly how much you'd be affected by the u32->u64 change. Thanks a lot! Maria On March 28, 2022

Re: Bird 2.0.8 + uClibc-ng, BGP RR + OSPF - OSPF falls to 'Alone' state at BGP routes recalculation

Hello! Do you have any log? Are you able to replicate such a behavior consistently? If so, could you please share an exact configuration with us to put it into our testbed? You can also enable "debug protocols all;" in your conf file. This produces a s***load of logs, yet it should yield

Re: Troubleshooting BIRD as flowspec manager

Hello! You can try capturing the packets in wire by tcpdump. It should tell you what exactly is being sent. Maria On August 24, 2021 8:17:26 PM UTC, Noris Rogers wrote: >Hello, > >I am seeking to setup BIRD as a flowspec manager to send messages to FRR >acting as a flowspec client. However,

Re: The function return true but it could not be export

Hello! I'd try: * "show route noexport all" to see what may be the reason to drop the route * add some logging to the filter to see why it is dropped BTW, what version are you using? As far as I remember, the BGP attributes are behaving differently on export in 1.6 and 2.0 Maria On June 6,

Re: I admit I am rookie to IP routing. Looking for a little bet of simple help configuring BIRD for simple routing.

Hello! If you have one router connecting these networks, this is just a matter of static routing, no need for BIRD. Otherwise, you may probably want to setup Babel or OSPF. Maria On April 27, 2021 12:04:30 AM GMT+02:00, Myron wrote: >I am trying to learn how to set-up a router and maintain a

Re: BIRD Journey to Threads: Chapter zero of a blogpost series

Hello! Yes, it is going to happen. The order should be (roughly) as follows: 0) basic multithreading support (already implemented) 1) structural changes in route export enabling table access from multiple threads 2) conversion of 'show route' to the new route export code 3) json route

Re: [PATCH] Add 'preferred' route attribute for selective add-path

of when these changes might get merged into master? > >Thanks! >Trisha >-- > >*Trisha Biswas* | Sr. Software Engineer, Network Systems >fastly.com | @fastly <https://twitter.com/fastly> | LinkedIn ><http://www.linkedin.com/company/fastly> > > >On S

Re: route aggregation

Hello! According to our internal decisions in this week, we may be able to implement some aggregations in one or two months, depending on how fast the needed refactoring happens. Anyway, there is a multithreaded preview release in the queue before this. Maria On February 18, 2021 1:47:25 PM

Re: Converting a route between tables via pipe proto?

Hello! This is currently not possible. There are some thoughts how to make it possible, yet never finished and implemented. Maria On January 22, 2021 9:26:59 PM GMT+01:00, David Johnson wrote: >Hi, > >I'm trying to see if bird can accomplish the following and so far I >can't >seem to find a way

Re: Unable to get Bird 2 to listen on the BGP socket

Hello! This means that you were refusing messages from the list for some amount of time. You may want to check your mailserver. Maria On November 22, 2020 7:38:10 PM GMT+01:00, Jason Kopacko wrote: >What is this about > >I haven't sent anything to this list in a while. >

Re: BIRD crashing when --enable-debug is set

Hello! Just a quick reply from my phone. When adding these checks, I also wanted to zero out slab objects but then I realized that these objects should be initialized anyway after allocation and in most cases all of these would be rewritten twice. The preferred way of using slab objects is

Re: BGP with ECMP and weight control

Hello! Would it be feasible for you to have a special route attribute to be set in filters that would control the nexthop weight? That seems to be probably a most simple solution. Maria On November 19, 2020 5:42:38 PM GMT+01:00, Nigel Kukard wrote: >On 11/19/20 4:06 PM, Alexander Demenshin

Re: Match Neighbor on Export Filter

Hello! Not for now. There is some extension of the filter language pending (not implemented yet) which would allow for protocol attributes queries. For now, you can make your filter a function and use different arguments in appropriate calls. Maria On November 7, 2020 2:34:50 PM GMT+01:00,

Re: A study on community-triggered updates in BGP

. But from the BGP collectors perspective, >we observe that around 50% of all announcements fall into the category >(i) and (ii), in March 2020. > >Thanks for your feedback. It's very insightful! > >best regards >Thomas > >On 10/17/20 10:39 AM, Maria Matějka wrote: >

Re: A study on community-triggered updates in BGP

Hello! If I read your paper correctly, I assume that this is just a feature of the BGP itself. To make it clear: I read that in some cases when a link inside one AS goes down, a route is reannounced with the same AS path but different communities because of e.g. some internal tagging which you

Re: Nexthop/nexthop groups question

with implementing Linux nexthops. Thank you for pointing it out, this is a very useful note from you. Maria On October 3, 2020 3:28:41 PM GMT+02:00, Marek Zarychta wrote: >On 23.09.2020 07:10, Maria Matějka wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Yes, we definitely want to support it, yet last time whe

Re: Dump/Show current running config?

Hello! It is quite a difficult task to dump the current config. Somewhere on the roadmap, there is possibly a change of internal structures that would allow for more versatile config, yet it is neither simple nor quickly done. So it is currently not possible, sorry. Maria On September 29, 2020

Re: Nexthop/nexthop groups question

Hello! Yes, we definitely want to support it, yet last time when we were talking about it, it was still unstable. It is good news that it really has come in, we'll study it and most likely also implement it. Thank you for pointing this out. Maria On September 22, 2020 11:08:02 PM GMT+02:00,

Re: Where to post patches to bird for making radv more useful?

Hello! This list is generally the right place to post your patches. Thank you for your contribution. Maria On September 11, 2020 10:04:27 PM GMT+02:00, "Gehrkens.IT GmbH | Heiko Wundram" wrote: >Hey all, > >I’ve played around with bird a bit (which we use as a routing daemon, >mainly for OSPF

Re: Bird can't add static route.

Hello! Just to be sure, does it work via iptools command, like ip route add…? Thanks Maria On August 19, 2020 5:10:18 PM GMT+02:00, Mikhail Petrov wrote: >Hello! > > > >I have a problem with bird, static routes and multipath. > >My bird config is https://pastebin.com/gLkFP6rK > >And all work

Re: Filters giving odd errors

Hello! The error message tells you that you are passing something strange to the condition on line 360. What do you have on line 360? Maria On August 13, 2020 4:46:12 PM GMT+02:00, "Skyler Mäntysaari" wrote: >Hi there, > >I'm using the template from

Re: BIRD trying to reinsert existing kernel routes, netlink issue?

Hello! BIRD reads the routes from kernel anyway, the import clause applies only on learned external routes. Do you have any export filter on that kernel protocol? Don't you have any suspicious warnings in log? Maria On August 2, 2020 7:08:11 PM GMT+02:00, Alarig Le Lay wrote: >Hi Sasha, > >On

Re: Minor usability enhancement for birdc - show hostname

Hello! This seems to be useful for me also. Will implement after returning from vacation unless anybody else is faster. Maria On July 3, 2020 9:09:23 PM GMT+02:00, Ross Tajvar wrote: >I agree, this would be nice to have as a configurable option. > >On Fri, Jul 3, 2020, 4:33 AM Tim Small wrote:

Re: Bird 2 for CentOS/EPEL 6?

Hello! Yes, we're dropping support for such an old GCC, mostly because we don't have enough resources (time) to manage those old systems for testing. Other problems are with lack of support of some C11 features. I should also say that the upcoming multithreaded versions will also need a

Re: Another newbie question: Creating BGP prefixes in a filter

Hello, Prefix aggregation is currently not supported. It's quite a lot of work to do it properly. As a workaround, you may export these routes to an auxiliary kernel table, run an external script to maintain the aggregated route and learn the result back to BIRD. Or you can simply use the

Re: Multiple Kernel Tables on one BIRD Table

Hello! There is a fundamental principle in BIRD that one BIRD table may be synced to at most one kernel table. Use BIRD pipe pseudoprotocol to duplicate the routes to more BIRD tables. This concept may be changed in future, yet not in near future. Maria On June 1, 2020 7:58:39 PM GMT+02:00,

Re: [BGP] bird and RFD

Hello! We know about that, yet we have postponed it at least after some changes on the multithreading journey as these changes offer better framework for RFD. See the mq-async-export branch for current development of one of these prerequisite changes for multithreading (decoupling export from

Re: Unable to build Bird2 with --with-protocols=bgp

Hello! This may be a bug in protocol selection as we don't care much about builds with a subset of protocols. Will check it. Maria On May 22, 2020 4:55:23 PM GMT+02:00, Nabeel Omer wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >I am trying to build Bird2 with `./configure --with-protocols=bgp` and >it prints the

Re: Pipe with scope link

You are also missing import all in the first kernel protocol, if I see correctly. Maria On May 5, 2020 1:04:37 AM GMT+02:00, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: >On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:34:38AM -0700, David Haupt wrote: >> Hi >> >> First time user of bird here so please be gentle. :) >> I am trying to

Re: Vulnerability? Bug? Missing check after xmalloc() in xstrdup().

Hello! xmalloc is guaranteed to return non-NULL. If it were to return NULL, BIRD would die instead. That's why it's xmalloc and not malloc. Maria On April 27, 2020 5:26:58 AM GMT+02:00, liupe...@zju.edu.cn wrote: >Hi, > >In lib/string.h line 38, > >static inline char * >xstrdup(const char *c)

Re: Filtering on Export-Protocol

function *filter_common_ipv4_out( string remote_peer_name ) { >> if remote_peer_name = 'peer-neo' then .; >> } > > >It is stupid because i define the peer-name twice. >But for now it will do the job relatively easily. > >I have over 40 peers, so I have to write the functi

Re: Filtering on Export-Protocol

Hello! Currently not supported. Is simple exact match enough for your purposes? This may be simply added to the filter language. Maria On April 8, 2020 6:47:49 PM GMT+02:00, Michael Rack wrote: >Hi Guys, > >if i am in the EXPORT-Routine, how can i access the "protocol-name" of >that >instance

Re: [BGP] MRAI connection-based implementation review

Hello! Use this list to send a patch set as it comes from git format-patch. You can also use git send-email to send it. Maria On April 6, 2020 12:22:22 PM GMT+02:00, Mattia Milani wrote: >Hello to everyone, in the past months I have implemented the MRAI timer > >in the BGP protocol and I

Re: Build for Debian MIPS

as this fix is completely independent on any recent development. Maria On April 5, 2020 1:45:06 AM GMT+02:00, Ross Tajvar wrote: >Thank you Maria! When will that update reach the Debian source repo, so >I >can build the package? > >On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 7:27 PM Maria Matějka >

Re: Build for Debian MIPS

Hello! Hopefully fixed in current master, commit 2928c5bcc7 The affected test was broken itself, yet it accidentally somehow worked on little endian. Maria On April 4, 2020 1:42:58 AM GMT+02:00, "Maria Matějka" wrote: >Hello! > >I've just replicated the bug via the proot

Re: Build for Debian MIPS

Hello! I've just replicated the bug via the proot approach. Thank you a lot for your help! Maria On April 2, 2020 1:47:32 PM GMT+02:00, Clemens Schrimpe wrote: >Hallo all - > >I built BIRD (1.x and 2.x) for the EdgeRouter platforms(!) myself for >many years now and I still do. At first I

Re: How to see as path

The show route command shows only reduced info. Use show route all to get full information. Maria On April 3, 2020 11:47:04 AM GMT+02:00, Fabiano D'Agostino wrote: >Good morning, >how can I see the as path of a route? >I think the command is 'show route' and I get: >192.168.5.0/24 unicast

Re: Build for Debian MIPS

Hello! We've not been able to build ourselves on MIPS yet, we went into some strange problems last time (don't remember exactly). Were you so kind please and could you please help us setting up Debian for MIPS in QEMU if I fail to manage it once more? The main issue was, what hardware to choose

Re: ROA with static protocol in BIRD 2

Hello! > I wonder if there's a good, full example about ROA with static protocol in > BIRD 2. The following snippet is only for BIRD 1.x, right? > > --- %< --- > roa table roa { > roa 1.0.0.0/24 max 24 as 13335; > # […] > } > --- %< --- Yes. > Based on various snippets and half examples on

Re: Fwd: BGP session closed after receipt of flowspec route without destination prefix

Hello! Well, RFC 5575 doesn't explicitly say that the flowspec rule must contain the destination chunk, anyway it specifies that these rules should be understood as additional information for unicast BGP prefixes. Therefore we assume that the dst is de facto mandatory, despite de iure it is

Re: Misleading "Symbol already defined" error

Hello! Fixed in master. Maria On 2/2/20 5:38 PM, Martin Weinelt wrote: > Hi, > > i was debugging this on and off for the last 36 hours and found the error > message quite misleading. > > [root@ganymede:/etc/bird]# cat bird2.conf > router id 172.23.42.3; > protocol device { >   scan time 10; >

Re: GCC 10 build failures at BIRD 2.0.7

>>> diff --git a/nest/route.h b/nest/route.h >>> index d2a07f09..b927db5f 100644 >>> --- a/nest/route.h >>> +++ b/nest/route.h >>> @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ typedef struct rta { >>>protocol-specific metric is >>> availabe */ >>> >>> >>> -const char *

Re: determining ipv4 or ipv6 net in filter

Yes. This version should work. BTW, I suggest using custom attributes instead of communities for all the route tagging. They work the same way as other attributes and all protocols (except for Pipe) ignore them. Maria On January 27, 2020 8:52:38 PM GMT+01:00, Robert Blayzor wrote: >After

Re: Enabling BGP FlowSpec routes export

Hello! You won't advertise anything else than basic IPv4 routes with capabilities off as the flowspec SAFI needs to be advertised and negotiated by a BGP Capability Advertisement. Maria On 1/21/20 2:05 PM, po...@davidepucci.it wrote: > Hi. > I'm setting up Bird (2.0.7) as a BGP FlowSpec

Re: bird conf 1.6 to 2.0

rotocol bgp ege2a_50_4 { >     local as 65533; >     neighbor 1.1.1.1 as 12345; >     source address 206.x.y.z; > >     description "EDGE2a.50.MIA"; >     multihop; > >     ipv4 { >    table as65533; >    import all

Re: RPKI support without SSH transport

> however, attempts to build it without /--disable-libssh/ result in a linking > error: Oops, sorry, I missed one include. Here is the fixed patch, now it compiles both with and without libSSH. Maria diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 40f021a1..da8546a6 100644 --- a/configure.ac

Re: Multi thread support

Yes. To be more specific, e. g. parallel filter processing is already in development, it even runs, yet it is somehow efficient only for long running filters. Import/export all is more than 100 times slower for now. It may happen that some multithreading will be released maybe during 2020.

Re: bird conf 1.6 to 2.0

Aargh, I messed up the reply. Please send the 1.6 config and 2.0 config and what is wrong. We can't figure out the cause from this. Maria On January 10, 2020 8:58:11 AM GMT+01:00, "Maria Matějka" wrote: >Hello! > >>I am trying to migrate the config from 1.6 to 2.

Re: bird conf 1.6 to 2.0

Hello! >I am trying to migrate the config from 1.6 to 2.0 on CentOS 8. I tried >to follow >https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/labs/bird/wikis/transition-notes-to-bird-2 >but my test config didn't work. Is there another guide or wiki I can >follow to be able to migrate to version 2 ? What didn't

Re: Socket error: TCP_MD5SIG: Cannot allocate memory

Hello! Have you tried to use the workaround mentioned here? https://bird.network.cz/pipermail/bird-users/2015-August/009882.html Maria On December 25, 2019 9:59:30 AM GMT+01:00, "穴澤 正恒" wrote: >Dear all, > >My name is Masatsune Anazawa, an affiliate of JPIX. >We are verifying the root server

Re: Long io loop / missing netlink messages

Hello! How much time does it take to list the kernel table? time ip r > /dev/null How many routes do you have in bird table? show route count And what export filter do you have for the kernel protocol in bird? Thanks Maria On December 21, 2019 1:07:25 PM GMT+01:00, Nico Schottelius wrote:

Re: rejected by protocol unicast

ist; >ipv4 { >#import filter { > # if net ~ [0.0.0.0/0, 192.168.255.0/24] then reject; ># accept; >#}; ># export all; >import all; >}; >} > >thx > > >

Re: Problems with compiling bird 2.7 on Debian Squeeze

Hello! It may be GCC; I have just compiled BIRD on GCC 4.7.2 on Debian Wheezy. If you have an older GCC, it may happen that it doesn't support flattened struct initializers (which produces this kind of compile errors). I remember seeing some similar compile error on older GCC's some time ago

Re: Increasing bgp_local_pref fails

Hello! This happens when bgp_med is initially undefined. Use something like if defined(bgp_med) then bgp_med = 100; else bgp_med = bgp_med + 100; Maria On 11/12/19 11:01 PM, Benedikt Neuffer wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to increase the MED attribute in an export filter: > bgp_med =

Re: RPKI validation on startup

Hello, this is due to the RPKI table being empty on startup. As a workaround, I suggest having bgp sessions with delayed start. The problem is also that bird doesn't reevaluate affected routes after ROA has changed. This is going to be fixed in near future, yet now the best thing to do is

Re: Revalidating RPKI

0 0 0 > 16275 > Import withdraws:4 0--- 0 > 4 > Export updates: 0 0 0--- > 0 > Export withdraws:0--------- > 0 > > So h

Re: Revalidating RPKI

Hello! On October 22, 2019 5:51:56 AM GMT+02:00, Darren O'Connor wrote: >I was reading the documentation for bird2 when I came across this: >You can validate routes (RFC 6483) using function roa_check() in filter >and >set it as import filter at the BGP protocol. BIRD should re-validate >all

Re: every minute: "I/O loop cycle took .... ms for 2 events"

On September 29, 2019 2:13:00 PM GMT+02:00, Christoph wrote: >> This means there are events that take 6 s, possibly postponing other >> events. May cause problems if you would run some protocols configured >> with tight timers (e.g. OSPF set to 5 s dead interval). >> >> This is probably

Re: BIRD on HW ASIC

Hello! I would suggest reimplementing what is in sysdep/linux, maybe partly, maybe completely. The netlink api is implemented in sysdep/linux/netlink.c, the internal api between BIRD's Unix common code and netlink is not documented; I would suggest looking for non-static functions in netlink.c

Re: bird >=2.0.4 Stack underflow and most routes become filtered

Will check it, thanks for your report. Maria On August 24, 2019 12:22:10 AM GMT+02:00, "Дружок 1" wrote: >Hi! >.. >/var/log/bird.log >2019-08-22 15:38:38.604 filters, line 1023: Stack underflow >2019-08-22 18:02:27.157 filters, line 511: Stack underflow >2019-08-22 18:02:30.616 filters, line

RE: BGP table size

>It is not a memory you should be concerned about. The main issue of >bird with huge BGP tables is CPU – bird uses only one core. Which is what is going to be fixed in a short time (about a month to first test release, I hope), at least if you don't use Kernel protocol. Merge to master is

Re: Route Flap Dampening

Hello! This feature seems to be feasible after converting route update path to the thread safe version. Current optimistic estimation of this feature is Q3 2020, then the flap dampening should be simple to add. Maria On July 23, 2019 11:26:28 PM GMT+02:00, Matthias Waehlisch wrote: >Hi, > >

Re: BIRD 2.0.4 and protocol RPKI in the config file

Hello! Have you compiled BIRD yourself, or are you using a package? This seems to be an "unknown protocol" problem, when RPKI is silently omitted from your binary due to missing dependencies. Maria On July 12, 2019 11:26:51 AM GMT+02:00, Irene Lalioti wrote: >Hello dear Maria and bird

Re: Bird 1.6.3 cycle-restarting with SegFault during load-testing

Hello! Please check your filedescriptor limit by ulimit -n and check how many files are open by lsof -p BIRD has no such limit, it is capable of handling any reasonable (fitting in memory) number of file descriptors. If you wanted any other help, feel free to ask more. BIRD should have no

Re: 100% CPU load with device scanning enabled

Fine! Anyway, I can offer you this: Most of the time spent is the configuration of OVS as I'm not familiar with it. If you could provide me with a script that I could just run with no configured OVS before and the bug manifests… whooa, it would really help me. Maria On May 7, 2019 6:53:42 AM

Re: bird remote control - socket unexpectedly closed

Hello! I don't know about any issue of this kind, anyway we don't test the control socket to be open for a long time. Are you able to reproduce it in some way? Thanks Maria On April 26, 2019 11:19:50 AM GMT+02:00, Kenth Eriksson wrote: >Hi! > >We are remote controlling a bird daemon using a

Re: Full (regression) test suite?

Scheck wrote: >Hello Maria, > >On Fri, 26 Apr 2019, Maria Matějka wrote: >> We don't know about any, sorry. It is something we'd like to create >and maintain. If you are into helping us with this issue, you're very >welcome. > >is there currently any test suite or are t

Re: Full (regression) test suite?

Hello! We don't know about any, sorry. It is something we'd like to create and maintain. If you are into helping us with this issue, you're very welcome. Maria On April 26, 2019 12:35:00 AM GMT+02:00, Robert Scheck wrote: >Hello all, > >is there something like a full (regression) test suite

Re: BIRD 2.0.4 segfaulting on ARM

Or, probably what would be even better – could you please help me running QEMU with this specific guest architecture? This is definitely an architecture which we would like to include in our test suite. Thanks Maria On April 25, 2019 11:36:11 PM GMT+02:00, "Maria Matějka" wro

Re: BIRD 2.0.4 segfaulting on ARM

Hello! ulimit -c unlimited bird ... (after it crashes) gdb bird core >bird crashes a few seconds after startup on my Hardkernel ODROID HC-2 >running Ubuntu. Kernel version is 4.14.111-158. > > >How can I debug this? > > >I tried: > > >$ bird -c bird.conf -d -D debug.log >

Re: Learning BIRD source

On April 15, 2019 3:03:38 PM GMT+02:00, Brian Topping wrote: >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 11:07 PM, Maria Matějka >wrote: >> >> And couldn't you just share what IDE you are trying to setup with >BIRD and what exact problems you have? It should take me less time

Re: Learning BIRD source

>In many cases, it’s sufficient to do a build and then load the >directory of built sources. Generated source out of something like >bison or flex would then be parsed as normal. But for some reason, it’s >not doing that with the BIRD tree. So this inquiry was really about >whether I would be

Re: Learning BIRD source

>> I think any IDE with C support you like should work, maybe except for >> Visual Studio which has no real C compiler anyway so it won't build >> there at all. > >How do you figure? Visual Studio has an ANSI C compiler. Oh, sorry, I always thought that the compiler was buggy even in ANSI

Re: Learning BIRD source

On April 12, 2019 8:52:47 PM GMT+02:00, Brian Topping wrote: >Developer team: > >I’d like to get better with the source. Due to being an inferior >specimen and/or too many other projects, I need help from tools like >CLion to make sense of source trees within weeks instead of years. > >Are

Re: Import filter on 2nd ASN in AS path?

Hi! Did you try using BGP path mask? Like if (bgp.path ~ [= ? bogon bogon * =]) … Writing this from my phone. Please consult documentation or filter/test.conf file in source tree for exact syntax and examples. Maria On March 26, 2019 10:34:39 AM GMT+01:00, Alexander Zubkov wrote: >Hi, >

Re: Bird 1.5 and 1.6 memory leak

Hello, if it occurs also on 1.6.4, could you please add also "birdcl show route count" output and some logs with debug all switched on? How does it get leaked, do you reconfigure many times? Does the memory consumption increase gradually or by larger amounts? Thanks Maria Quidquid latine

Re: Unix virtual interfaces

Try # ip link add lo1 type dummy # ip a add 10.10.10.10/24 dev lo1 The ifconfig tool is deprecated. M. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. -Original Message- From: RICCARDO RUSSO To: bird-users@network.cz Sent: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 4:41 PM Subject:

Re: BGP import route

Hello! First of all, we don't support this old version. Please upgrade, either to 1.6.4 or to 2.0.2. Second, the other side seems to send multiprotocol NLRI to you. BIRD in 1.x versions AFAIK does not support this extension and should not announce it. What is the remote software? Writing

Re: RPKI / roa_check() question - BIRD 2.0.2

The bgp_path.last_nonaggregated attribute should help you. Don't have user manual right now here, writing from my phone, just trying to recall it from my memory. Maria Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. -Original Message- From: Radu Anghel To:

Re: Can't Log information about a double

Bird's internal sprintf doesn't support floats, at least for now, in 1.6.x probably forever. There may be some patch that adds it. Look for some branch with "flowspec", I think I was implementing something like this for printing BGP flowspec and it is probably not merged. I don't have the git

Re: static routes and 'src' parameter

We may also add iface address access in future but it isn't as easy as it seems. The iface may have more than one address and we still don't have a method to iterate over a list in filters. Anyway, the "foreach" construction is on our todo list... Stay tuned! M. Quidquid latine dictum sit,

Re: Version 2.0.1

Hi, there definitely is some segfault fix but there may be more bugs. If you could send at least your config file, it would be helpful. Anyway, the crash file (corefile) will help much more. Thanks Maria Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. -Original Message- From: "David S."