Hi guys,
I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table
don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the next-hop being
link-local and the interface being UP.
IPv4 routes I have no problem with, working as expected.
I must be doing something wrong on my side, if
On 9/11/19 2:23 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:31:16PM +0000, Nigel Kukard wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm having an issue where IPv6 routes from the kernel routing table
>> don't appear to end up in my t_kernel6 table. Despite the n
Hi guys,
Is there perhaps an equivalent in BIRD for the following...
^(65000_)+(65101_)+(65253_)+$
The closest I could come was the following, but I am unsure if it would
match if any of the networks prepend.
if (bgp_path ~ [= 65000 65101 65253 =])
-N
Hi guys,
I may be going blind or just dumb, but I could of sworn this worked like
a year ago in v2.
I have a t_static4 table, with a static device route, I pipe this to my
master4 table, then pipe my master4 table to RIP and only pick out the
RTS_STATIC_DEVICE routes.
However the source is set
On 2020-08-22 17:02, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:23:57AM +0000, Nigel Kukard wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I may be going blind or just dumb, but I could of sworn this worked like
>> a year ago in v2.
>>
>> I have a t_static4 table, with a
Hi guys,
I'm wondering if someone knows the answer to this, here is the setup...
R1 => R2 => R3
- R1 advertises a route (in this case 0.0.0.0/0) to R2 (from static or
kernel)
- R2 accepts the route with "import all"
- R2 has a filter for the route with "export my_filter;" and in that
Hi guys,
It took me some time to figure this out, perhaps a slight improvement to
the docs attached may help. :)
-N
>From 0975f466e6cdf53223c1f6a2dab62d1ee80a2268 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nigel Kukard
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:16:26 +
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: Added example of sta
On 11/19/20 9:25 PM, Maria Matějka wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Would it be feasible for you to have a special route attribute to be
> set in filters that would control the nexthop weight? That seems to be
> probably a most simple solution.
That would certainly work for me, one can then use any
On 9/28/23 17:07, Daniel Gröber wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 04:03:33PM +, Nigel Kukard via Bird-users wrote:
Well .. I feel embarrassed now. The issue was a missing "kernel table ;"
in the kernel protocol.
Don't feel bad. I was going to look into using VRFs with bird and n
Well .. I feel embarrassed now. The issue was a missing "kernel table
;" in the kernel protocol.
-N
On 9/28/23 15:29, Nigel Kukard via Bird-users wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering if someone could point out what I'm doing wrong here?
all my routes are being added to the system
Hi there,
I'm wondering if someone could point out what I'm doing wrong here? all
my routes are being added to the system main table and not my VRF.
I could swear I had this working 100% (I took my config and added vrf
"vrf0" to each protocol), i then regenerated my config file using my
Hi there fellow BIRD users,
Does anyone perhaps know if there is a way to match this field?
I'm trying to create a filter to prevent these from being imported into
my one table which I feed into OSPF6.
I've tried, Kernel.source and kernel.source sadly with no luck. This
item corresponds to
egards,
Alexander Zubkov
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023, 22:20 Nigel Kukard via Bird-users
wrote:
Hi there fellow BIRD users,
Does anyone perhaps know if there is a way to match this field?
I'm trying to create a filter to prevent these from being imported
into my one table which
On 9/21/22 08:37, Tore Anderson via Bird-users wrote:
* Ondrej Zajicek
i think that 'configure' CLI command should remove unused dynamic BGP
instaces as a side-effect of its unused protocols cleanup code, even if
there is no change in configuration.
I had already tried that unsuccessfully,
On 12/13/23 10:14, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
Hello!
On 2023-12-13 10:19, Kees Meijs | Nefos wrote:
Hi,
On 12-12-2023 17:20, Maria Matejka via Bird-users wrote:
We're prototyping a machine-friendly interface which should include,
in some later versions, also subscribing to various
Hi all,
I was busy reading
https://bgpfilterguide.nlnog.net/guides/reject_invalids/ and noticed the
following text...
Note: REALLY DONT store the validation state inside a bgp_community or
bgp_large_community or bgp_ext_community variables. It can cause CPU &
memory overload resulting in
Hi there Richard,
On 4/29/24 19:14, Richard Laager wrote:
Perhaps I am naive, but I assumed one would validate RPKI on the eBGP edge and
simply reject INVALID routes.
Why would one want to accept INVALID at all?
If we agree one would reject INVALID, then what is left to tag?
For my
On 4/29/24 19:33, Job Snijders wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 21:27, Nigel Kukard via Bird-users
wrote:
Hi there Richard,
On 4/29/24 19:14, Richard Laager wrote:
Perhaps I am naive, but I assumed one would validate RPKI on the eBGP edge
and simply reject INVALID routes
18 matches
Mail list logo
