Good morning shymaa,
> I just want to add an alarming info to this thread...
>
> There are at least 5.7m UTXOs≤1000 Sat (~7%),
> 8.04 m ≤1$ (10%),
> 13.5m ≤ 0.0001BTC (17%)
>
> It seems that bitInfoCharts took my enquiry seriously and added a main link
> for dust analysis:
>
Are you big Developers aware of what is said in this thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5385559.new#new
That "Omni" ALT coin, and all Alt coins and new protocols do create such
extensive amount of dust that they are thinking of dividing 1 Satoshi to
fractions or how to accept a UTXO
On 2022-02-07 14:34, Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev wrote:
I do think that UTXO set size is something that will need to be
addressed at some point. I liked the idea of utreexo or some other
accumulator as the ultimate solution to this problem.
What about using economic incentives to
I just want to add an alarming info to this thread...
*There are at least 5.7m UTXOs≤1000 Sat (~7%), *
*8.04 m ≤1$ (10%), *
*13.5m ≤ 0.0001BTC (17%)*
It seems that bitInfoCharts took my enquiry seriously and added a main link
for dust analysis:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022, 16:44 Billy Tetrud via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > every lightning network transaction adds one dust UTXO
>
> Could you clarify what you mean here? What dust do lightning transactions
> create?
>
I mean this msg
> every lightning network transaction adds one dust UTXO
Could you clarify what you mean here? What dust do lightning transactions
create?
I do think that UTXO set size is something that will need to be addressed
at some point. I liked the idea of utreexo or some other accumulator as the
> On Feb 6, 2022, at 10:52, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
>
>> Dear Bitcoin Developers,
>
>> -When I contacted bitInfoCharts to divide the first interval of addresses,
>> they kindly did divided to 3 intervals. From here:
>>
> Dear Bitcoin Developers,
> -When I contacted bitInfoCharts to divide the first interval of addresses,
> they kindly did divided to 3 intervals. From here:
> https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html
> -You can see that there are more than 3.1m addresses holding ≤
Dear Bitcoin Developers,
-I think you may remember me sending to you about my proposal to partition
( and other stuff all about) the UTXO set Merkle in bridge servers
providing proofs Stateless nodes.
-While those previous suggestions might not have been on the most interest
of core Developers, I
