Thank you so much for taking time to actually review the codes. I hope you will
keep raising questions when you feel something might be wrong. This is how
things supposed to work and we should not be affected by some forum discussions.
> On August 26, 2016 at 9:16 AM Sergio Demian Lerner
> wro
Because there was a discussion on reddit about this topic, I want to
clarify that Johnson Lau explained how a check in the code prevents this
attack.
So there is no real attack.
Also note that the subject of this thread has a question mark, which means
that I'm asking the community for clarificati
Adding witness data to a non-segwit script is invalid by consensus:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/d612837814020ae832499d18e6ee5eb919a87907/src/script/interpreter.cpp#L1467
This PR will detect such violation early and ban the peer:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8499
Another
In a previous thread ("New BIP: Dealing with OP_IF and OP_NOTIF
malleability in P2WSH") it was briefly discussed what happens if someone
modifies segwit data during transmission. I think the discussion should
continue.
What worries me is what happens with non-segwit transactions after segwit
is ac
